lulz

Actually, I missed nothing. You, on the other hand, lack any sense of irony whatsoever.


Exactly.

Just like the claims made re: the existence of "global warmi"....errrrr...."climate change".

Thanks for playing.

 

You mean all those same indications that caused folks, such as yourself, to believe he couldn't possibly be elected POTUS, right?

Just don't be surprised if you're proven wrong about Trump. Again.

One could very rightly say the past several decades of his life have been all about proving people wrong in their judgments of him, his potential, and what he will accomplish.

 

I think we should clarify that there were only officially 800 jobs saved in this deal, which I agree is a good thing. Carrier, however, is still moving 1300 jobs to Mexico.

 

Wait, do you really think global warming doesn't exist?

 

Yes, I believe he does and will prove it to you by changing the subject or using the word lulz but without any real scientific evidence.

 

Yeah.

Obama's administration just approved NAI.

You are demonstrably, undeniably a sucker.

 

Nevermind. . .

 

This is pure stupidity. Scientists theorize that it is caused by humans. See the keyword "theorize". Nobody really knows. I don't think that's what people are debating. You cannot actually say it is not caused by humans, thus let me ask you a question. If there is a 1% chance that it is caused by humans and we had the ability to change it, would you do so? Don't we owe it to generations to come to do everything in our power to try and stop this? Why exactly would you ever possibly hold on to doing nothing? That makes absolutely no sense. There are two data points that are matching up. The rise in temperature, coupled with the rise of industrial byproducts. This is not rocket surgery. Anyone who believes in doing nothing about global warming is completely and utterly insane and or selfish. And if you are letting politics drive your thinking on this issue then you really need to look at this from an unemotional logical approach of risk versus reward.

 

Climate change might include, or not include global warming, it may include, or not include global cooling. All we know is that humans are unnaturally affecting the global climate in some way, be that cooling, or possibly warming, or possibly causing an extended equilibrium, or not at all.

This is the argument of climate scientists.

 

Lemme explain the why, who, and how of "climate change" to you, in 3 simple pictures...

































Take away tax-payer funded climate research and just watch the temps come down.

The whole thing is massive fraud. Proven countless times over.