Trans States acknowledges MRJ scope issues
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,939
Trans States acknowledges MRJ scope issues
This was on the ALPA daily email.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Trans States Holdings said it begin taking delivery of “its order for 50 Mitsubishi Regional Jets” in 2017. Speaking “on the sidelines of the delivery ceremony for American Airlines’ first Embraer E-175 in” Brazil, Trans States president Richard Leach conceded that the MRJ90s the company “has on order will have a maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) that is higher than is allowed by scope clauses in US mainline airlines’ pilot labor contracts.” Trans States, the parent of US-based regionals Trans States Airlines, Compass Airlines and GoJet Airlines, has not decided “which major airline Trans States will operate the MRJ90s for.”
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 122
[QUOTE=tom11011;1830907]This was on the ALPA daily email.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Skywest also has a 100 orders for the MRJ 90. Do they know something we don't? Lets all hope that the mainline pilots never let scope limits allow this big of an airplane, it belongs at the mainline. Hopefully TSA and Skywest just change their orders to MRJ70s.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Skywest also has a 100 orders for the MRJ 90. Do they know something we don't? Lets all hope that the mainline pilots never let scope limits allow this big of an airplane, it belongs at the mainline. Hopefully TSA and Skywest just change their orders to MRJ70s.
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
[QUOTE=PilotLife4me;1830916]
Yes, they know something you don't.
This was on the ALPA daily email.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Skywest also has a 100 orders for the MRJ 90. Do they know something we don't? Lets all hope that the mainline pilots never let scope limits allow this big of an airplane, it belongs at the mainline. Hopefully TSA and Skywest just change their orders to MRJ70s.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Skywest also has a 100 orders for the MRJ 90. Do they know something we don't? Lets all hope that the mainline pilots never let scope limits allow this big of an airplane, it belongs at the mainline. Hopefully TSA and Skywest just change their orders to MRJ70s.
Yes, they know something you don't.
#5
Another step backwards for everyone if these MRJ90s are parked at any regional carrier. I pray to little baby jesus tonight, "Dear 9lbs 8oz little sweet baby jesus, please give strength to all mainline pilots everywhere to raise the middle finger in the face of any regional manager that even mentions scope". In all his little cute glory ...AMEN
#6
[QUOTE=PilotLife4me;1830916]
i agree with your philosophy but the MRJ is no bigger than the 170/175 ( i believe 70-80 seats)
This was on the ALPA daily email.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Skywest also has a 100 orders for the MRJ 90. Do they know something we don't? Lets all hope that the mainline pilots never let scope limits allow this big of an airplane, it belongs at the mainline. Hopefully TSA and Skywest just change their orders to MRJ70s.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Skywest also has a 100 orders for the MRJ 90. Do they know something we don't? Lets all hope that the mainline pilots never let scope limits allow this big of an airplane, it belongs at the mainline. Hopefully TSA and Skywest just change their orders to MRJ70s.
#7
[QUOTE=IlliniPilot99;1830944]
It's not the number of seats, it's MTOW, right?
Either way, 175s should not/never have been at the regionals - they should be flown by mainline because they do mainline routes.
Either way, 175s should not/never have been at the regionals - they should be flown by mainline because they do mainline routes.
#8
Bracing for Fallacies
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,061
[QUOTE=block30;1830956]They routinely put 145s and 200s on hub-to-hub routes. Does that make those airplanes a mainline aircraft?
I agree about the 1000nm part though. A 3-hour flight is a mainline flight. Anything over 1.5-2 really.
I agree about the 1000nm part though. A 3-hour flight is a mainline flight. Anything over 1.5-2 really.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post