Search
Notices
Trans States Airlines Regional Airline

Trans States acknowledges MRJ scope issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2015, 06:07 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,939
Default Trans States acknowledges MRJ scope issues

This was on the ALPA daily email.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Trans States Holdings said it begin taking delivery of “its order for 50 Mitsubishi Regional Jets” in 2017. Speaking “on the sidelines of the delivery ceremony for American Airlines’ first Embraer E-175 in” Brazil, Trans States president Richard Leach conceded that the MRJ90s the company “has on order will have a maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) that is higher than is allowed by scope clauses in US mainline airlines’ pilot labor contracts.” Trans States, the parent of US-based regionals Trans States Airlines, Compass Airlines and GoJet Airlines, has not decided “which major airline Trans States will operate the MRJ90s for.”
tom11011 is offline  
Old 02-24-2015, 06:18 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 122
Default

[QUOTE=tom11011;1830907]This was on the ALPA daily email.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline


Skywest also has a 100 orders for the MRJ 90. Do they know something we don't? Lets all hope that the mainline pilots never let scope limits allow this big of an airplane, it belongs at the mainline. Hopefully TSA and Skywest just change their orders to MRJ70s.
PilotLife4me is offline  
Old 02-24-2015, 06:27 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Default

[QUOTE=PilotLife4me;1830916]
Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
This was on the ALPA daily email.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline


Skywest also has a 100 orders for the MRJ 90. Do they know something we don't? Lets all hope that the mainline pilots never let scope limits allow this big of an airplane, it belongs at the mainline. Hopefully TSA and Skywest just change their orders to MRJ70s.

Yes, they know something you don't.
NVUS is offline  
Old 02-24-2015, 06:49 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 453
Default

They could also lease them to the majors.
Maingear is offline  
Old 02-24-2015, 06:58 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Papa Bear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 323
Default

Another step backwards for everyone if these MRJ90s are parked at any regional carrier. I pray to little baby jesus tonight, "Dear 9lbs 8oz little sweet baby jesus, please give strength to all mainline pilots everywhere to raise the middle finger in the face of any regional manager that even mentions scope". In all his little cute glory ...AMEN
Papa Bear is offline  
Old 02-24-2015, 07:01 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
IlliniPilot99's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 577
Default

[QUOTE=PilotLife4me;1830916]
Originally Posted by tom11011 View Post
This was on the ALPA daily email.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline


Skywest also has a 100 orders for the MRJ 90. Do they know something we don't? Lets all hope that the mainline pilots never let scope limits allow this big of an airplane, it belongs at the mainline. Hopefully TSA and Skywest just change their orders to MRJ70s.
i agree with your philosophy but the MRJ is no bigger than the 170/175 ( i believe 70-80 seats)
IlliniPilot99 is offline  
Old 02-24-2015, 07:04 AM
  #7  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

[QUOTE=IlliniPilot99;1830944]
Originally Posted by PilotLife4me View Post

i agree with your philosophy but the MRJ is no bigger than the 170/175 ( i believe 70-80 seats)
It's not the number of seats, it's MTOW, right?

Either way, 175s should not/never have been at the regionals - they should be flown by mainline because they do mainline routes.
snippercr is offline  
Old 02-24-2015, 07:07 AM
  #8  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

[QUOTE=Mercyful Fate;1830954]
Originally Posted by snippercr View Post

So, what exactly defines a "mainline" route?
Hub to hub and 1,000 plus NM is a no brainer.
block30 is offline  
Old 02-24-2015, 07:08 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
IlliniPilot99's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 577
Default

[QUOTE=Mercyful Fate;1830954]
Originally Posted by snippercr View Post

So, what exactly defines a "mainline" route?
hub to hub or hub to city that allows only a certain number of passenger seat miles per hour
IlliniPilot99 is offline  
Old 02-24-2015, 07:10 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,061
Default

[QUOTE=block30;1830956]
Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate View Post

Hub to hub and 1,000 plus NM is a no brainer.
They routinely put 145s and 200s on hub-to-hub routes. Does that make those airplanes a mainline aircraft?

I agree about the 1000nm part though. A 3-hour flight is a mainline flight. Anything over 1.5-2 really.
CBreezy is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ilsbird
Republic Airways
41
02-19-2014 08:31 AM
Kassimo10
Career Questions
85
07-25-2013 11:44 PM
DegeReguard
Career Questions
10
06-06-2013 07:36 AM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
0
06-01-2005 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices