Search

Notices
Trans States Airlines Regional Airline

Trans States acknowledges MRJ scope issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2015 | 01:50 PM
  #31  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
Hey, i think it would be great to have 737's flying into BTM and CPR again...Delta is leaving so much money on the table by not doing so.

Psssst, don't ever go into making any business decisions for anyone.
I think you're having a problem differentiating the term "mainline route" from current mainline aircraft.

Your straw-man argument came charging into battle when you mentioned 737's.
Old 02-24-2015 | 02:22 PM
  #32  
24/48's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
Hey, i think it would be great to have 737's flying into BTM and CPR again...Delta is leaving so much money on the table by not doing so.

Psssst, don't ever go into making any business decisions for anyone.
Who says DAL would have to fly it with a 737? Why not a 717? Why not a 190, provided DAL were to add it to it's fleet? The fact that it is a DL coded flight means it's mainline, right now it just so happens to be outsourced.
Old 02-24-2015 | 02:35 PM
  #33  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
Straw man? Are you some sort of liberal? Liberals loooove that word.
Negative!

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
So, go ahead and edumacate me on the difference between a mainline route and a mainline aircraft. You know, in your terms.
I'd consider a mainline route to be a city pairing that is or once was served by mainline crews. Also, any route that is served by a CPA carrier at the request of a mainline carrier. SkyWest, Republic, Horizon, PSA... none of these companies did the market research and decided operating into BTM or CPR was a good idea. That was done by UAL/DAL/AAG/Alaska.

A mainline aircraft is just that. An aircraft operated by mainline. At present, the smallest of which seems to be the 737/319/E190/MD80 types. The moment a mainline carrier buys a new type, it's a mainline aircraft. What we have at present is a bunch of mainline routes being flown by regional pilots in aircraft operated by regionals. There's nothing preventing a mainline carrier from purchasing some E175's or CRJ's and operating them with mainline pilots.

The whole thing is just semantics, used by management to excuse the sub-standard pay and quality of life that is experienced by those working at contract carriers. The point of my earlier post was to illustrate the fact that "regionals" are nothing of the sort. Contract carriers are flying long domestic routes that are on par with their mainline counterparts. This is problematic from a compensation and career advancement point of view.
Old 02-24-2015 | 03:06 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Emb 170/175 FO
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011
This was on the ALPA daily email.
Trans States expects first MRJ in 2017; awaits scope clause relief | Airframes content from ATWOnline
Trans States Holdings said it begin taking delivery of “its order for 50 Mitsubishi Regional Jets” in 2017. Speaking “on the sidelines of the delivery ceremony for American Airlines’ first Embraer E-175 in” Brazil, Trans States president Richard Leach conceded that the MRJ90s the company “has on order will have a maximum takeoff weight (MTOW) that is higher than is allowed by scope clauses in US mainline airlines’ pilot labor contracts.” Trans States, the parent of US-based regionals Trans States Airlines, Compass Airlines and GoJet Airlines, has not decided “which major airline Trans States will operate the MRJ90s for.”
Also of note, the Cseries 300 is scheduled for its first flight in 2 days and is supposed to start deliveries within the next year. Who is republic supposed to operate it for??
Old 02-24-2015 | 03:07 PM
  #35  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by TurbineTime
Also of note, the Cseries 300 is scheduled for its first flight in 2 days and is supposed to start deliveries within the next year. Who is republic supposed to operate it for??
It'd be ideal on lots of Alaska routes out of SEA and no scope issues?

GF
Old 02-24-2015 | 03:11 PM
  #36  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
Sure there is something preventing them, and it is cost of operating those aircraft compared to what regionals can do it for. Besides, major "mainline" carriers don't want to be bothered with that kind of flying anyway. They know where the gravy is, and it is bigger planes with more seats, flying longer hauls.
There is definitely as cost advantage to the regional model, but I'm left wondering how much of an advantage it really is.

For example: SkyWest in 2013 had $59 million in profit on revenue of $3.3 billion. There's a 1.78% return. For this privilege, their mainline partners are willing to pay for all of the associated costs of having a management team and administration teams in place to run this company. So essentially, if you were to remove the senior and middle management and erroneous admin personnel, and push the aircraft over to the mainline certificate, you'd be saving quite a bit of money. You'd lose out on the hourly rate for the crews, but considering it would most likely go very junior, once a pilot had adequate seniority, they'd bid over to an existing airframe... so the years on the payscale past the first few would likely be unused.

There's a definite break-even point, and the margin is pretty close as it is. If the staffing at regionals gets bad enough, we might see someone try to find out exactly how much it costs...
Old 02-24-2015 | 03:25 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,474
Likes: 1,038
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800
There is definitely as cost advantage to the regional model, but I'm left wondering how much of an advantage it really is.

For example: SkyWest in 2013 had $59 million in profit on revenue of $3.3 billion. There's a 1.78% return. For this privilege, their mainline partners are willing to pay for all of the associated costs of having a management team and administration teams in place to run this company. So essentially, if you were to remove the senior and middle management and erroneous admin personnel, and push the aircraft over to the mainline certificate, you'd be saving quite a bit of money. You'd lose out on the hourly rate for the crews, but considering it would most likely go very junior, once a pilot had adequate seniority, they'd bid over to an existing airframe... so the years on the payscale past the first few would likely be unused.

There's a definite break-even point, and the margin is pretty close as it is. If the staffing at regionals gets bad enough, we might see someone try to find out exactly how much it costs...
Delta's net income for 2014 was only 1.7% of total Revenue. So, does that mean they should close those doors too?
Old 02-24-2015 | 03:26 PM
  #38  
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Mercyful Fate
If there were more money to be made by the majors flying these airplanes, you can bet your life they would be doing it. Majors flying these airplanes is a regional pilots wet dream, as it would be a quicker route to getting hired by a major.
I absolutely agree. Given an endless supply of cheap labor, they have no reason to change. In an environment where entry-level people are looking for incentives beyond "They offered me a job!" to pick a regional to work for, a little creativity might be in order.

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Delta's net income for 2014 was only 1.7% of total Revenue. So, does that mean they should close those doors too?
You've missed the entire point. The point was regarding low profit margins as they're correlated to how much revenue a smaller aircraft can generate, when compared against the costs of erroneous management teams at companies that don't really need to exist.... not about the low profit margin of the airline industry in general.
Old 02-24-2015 | 03:36 PM
  #39  
Swedish Blender's Avatar
Where's my Mai Tai?
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,821
Likes: 13
From: fins to the left, fins to the right
Default

Originally Posted by pete2800
You'd lose out on the hourly rate for the crews, but considering it would most likely go very junior, once a pilot had adequate seniority, they'd bid over to an existing airframe... so the years on the payscale past the first few would likely be unused.
You left out quite a bit.

Mainline benefits
Mainline FAs
Mainline mechanics
Mainline tampers
Mainline ground support

Many years ago, AMR offered the APA the CRJ-700s that were going to Eagle if they could make it cost neutral. The pilots could, but they couldn't get the rest of he above mentioned groups to.
Old 02-24-2015 | 03:37 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default

Scope is a mouthwash.

Legacy execs take a swig, gargle, rinse and spit it out.

It then contains germs.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ilsbird
Republic Airways
41
02-19-2014 08:31 AM
Kassimo10
Career Questions
85
07-25-2013 11:44 PM
DegeReguard
Career Questions
10
06-06-2013 07:36 AM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
0
06-01-2005 03:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices