Deny NAI failed, given final approval by DOT
#191
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 634
Why on earth would anyone want to quit a US legacy airline for NAI????
#193
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 375
#194
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
FoC allows aircraft manufactures to explore other options, such as machine learning, and other drone technologies. I've said before on here, machine learning, and FoC is the death of the pilot profession. Today we have this
Soon there will be self driving cars, then self flying aircraft, machine learning will kill most of the jobs in this country. The current regulations do not allow a 121 aircraft with less than two pilots be certified, FoC removes that requirement. That's our only protection, as this technology is available today, not in the future.
Soon there will be self driving cars, then self flying aircraft, machine learning will kill most of the jobs in this country. The current regulations do not allow a 121 aircraft with less than two pilots be certified, FoC removes that requirement. That's our only protection, as this technology is available today, not in the future.
I agree with you. However, getting on a plane with no pilot will be a bridge to far for some people. After the German wings incident I'd say a plane with two pilots will be required for a while. AI will be able to replace us, but I'd give it 20-30 years before we need to worry about it.
Now if I were a truck driver I'd be cr@piping my pants right now.
#195
#196
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Here is a link to a company that is replacing legal clerks with AI.
http://www.rossintelligence.com
Here is video of a fully autonomous Tesla today.
https://youtu.be/C3DbrYx-SN4
Experts give it about 20 years until AI is smarter than us. Here is a great article about it. Mind bending stuff.
http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html
#198
Oh wait.
#199
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Wait, what?!
The EU most certainly did go to bat for NAI, by filing for independent arbitration, as called for in the Open Skies treaty, on behalf of NAI. It was this filing for arbitration that caused the US DOT to finally relent because, in their own words, there was no legal grounds to deny the approval. The DOT knew they would lose in arbitration because NOBODY has cited which provision NAI used to violate Article 17 bis of the Open Skies Treaty. If you know which provision they used, I am sure ALPA and the US DOT would love to know because they have yet to name it.
I still want to know how anyone can argue that NAI is circumventing EU labour laws by sneakily registering in an EU country.
The EU most certainly did go to bat for NAI, by filing for independent arbitration, as called for in the Open Skies treaty, on behalf of NAI. It was this filing for arbitration that caused the US DOT to finally relent because, in their own words, there was no legal grounds to deny the approval. The DOT knew they would lose in arbitration because NOBODY has cited which provision NAI used to violate Article 17 bis of the Open Skies Treaty. If you know which provision they used, I am sure ALPA and the US DOT would love to know because they have yet to name it.
I still want to know how anyone can argue that NAI is circumventing EU labour laws by sneakily registering in an EU country.
The opportunities created by the Agreement are not intended to undermine labor standards or the labor-related rights and principles contained in the Parties' respective laws.
#200
Experts give it about 20 years until AI is smarter than us. Here is a great article about it. Mind bending stuff.
The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 1 - Wait But Why
The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 1 - Wait But Why
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post