Why DAL's proposed ratio is inequitable
#111
Calling my responses "emotional" shows two things. One, you need to improve in English comprehension. Two, you like to dismiss someone's opinions rather than debate. Niether of these attributes add anything to a discussion in my opinion. I won't take the least offense if you put me on ignore.
Carl
#112
No one is faulting you, I understand your desire completely. That said, We had to give up/modify parts of our CBA to get that cash. I'm still not sure if I'm personally OK with that, but what are you willing to do or give up for that cash? Nothing is free, you get what you negotiate, not what you think you deserve.
#113
I think Carl has been pretty non-emotional, to be honest. Pretty good discussion about this so far.
Pretty impressive to be so senior, AND to be comfortable using computers and the "interweb".
Hopefully this all gets worked out sooner rather than later so we can all have more beer money.
Pretty impressive to be so senior, AND to be comfortable using computers and the "interweb".
Hopefully this all gets worked out sooner rather than later so we can all have more beer money.
#114
No you are not wrong in wanting equity. But you have to realize it is the job of your MEC to negotiate it. You do not pay dues for the Delta MEC yet, so how could they negotiate for you? Pattern bargaining is another thing... And FWIW.. I want you to get equity too..
#115
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
I think Carl has been pretty non-emotional, to be honest. Pretty good discussion about this so far.
Pretty impressive to be so senior, AND to be comfortable using computers and the "interweb".
Hopefully this all gets worked out sooner rather than later so we can all have more beer money.
Pretty impressive to be so senior, AND to be comfortable using computers and the "interweb".
Hopefully this all gets worked out sooner rather than later so we can all have more beer money.
#116
I don't know where you guys are getting this information from. If it's your MEC, I wonder what other lies they're spreading...
Of the top 500 at Delta, on the April seniority list, the median age is 54 years and the mean is 54.5. The number of Delta pilots in the top 500 who are younger than 50...wait for it...thirty-three. 'Round these parts, us good 'ole boys don't call that "the majority."
Remember, "buddy" is only half a word. Total pilots at Delta over age 50 as of today: 2,564. (I'm sure most of these have turned 50 since you talked to your buddy, though.)
I'm going to have to throw the flag on that one. I don't have a NWA seniority list, but I've got to presume that there are more than 8 pilots at NWA who are between 52 and 57 years old. If you are assuming that all of the NWA pilots are going to retire at 60, that's a non-starter. Unless it's the law, we're not buying it. So we'll move forward under the assumption that you'd retire #9 at age 65 if NWA stood alone, and so will everyone else, since there isn't another cutoff mandated anywhere.
According to APC, Northwest has 5,156 pilots, which puts you at "around" 9.7%. On a combined list by straight ratio, you'd be behind "around" 499 former-NWA pilots and "around" 710 existing Delta pilots, or 1,210/12,480 of the combined seniority list. (Number 710 at Delta is an 11/86 hire senior enough to hold ATL 777 captain, by the way, so no worries about getting bumped.)
Of those senior to you, you've indicated that all but 8 of the former-NWA pilots are older. Of the top 710 Delta pilots, 306 are 52 or younger, so in the worst case for you (assuming all 52-year-old Delta pilots are younger than you with no attrition), you'll retire at number 315. We don't know the size of the combined carrier in 13 years, but using today's numbers, you'd retire at 2.52% after the SLI vs. 0.175% at standalone NWA. Sure, percentage-wise, it's a significant difference, but not nearly as big as your initial post made it out to be, especially considering you're already a 744 captain.
I'll let the junior NWA guys chime in with their opinions on the raw deal you'll be getting, forced to spend the next 13 years plying the Pacific at the top of the payscale.
Of the top 500 at Delta, on the April seniority list, the median age is 54 years and the mean is 54.5. The number of Delta pilots in the top 500 who are younger than 50...wait for it...thirty-three. 'Round these parts, us good 'ole boys don't call that "the majority."
I'm going to have to throw the flag on that one. I don't have a NWA seniority list, but I've got to presume that there are more than 8 pilots at NWA who are between 52 and 57 years old. If you are assuming that all of the NWA pilots are going to retire at 60, that's a non-starter. Unless it's the law, we're not buying it. So we'll move forward under the assumption that you'd retire #9 at age 65 if NWA stood alone, and so will everyone else, since there isn't another cutoff mandated anywhere.
According to APC, Northwest has 5,156 pilots, which puts you at "around" 9.7%. On a combined list by straight ratio, you'd be behind "around" 499 former-NWA pilots and "around" 710 existing Delta pilots, or 1,210/12,480 of the combined seniority list. (Number 710 at Delta is an 11/86 hire senior enough to hold ATL 777 captain, by the way, so no worries about getting bumped.)
Of those senior to you, you've indicated that all but 8 of the former-NWA pilots are older. Of the top 710 Delta pilots, 306 are 52 or younger, so in the worst case for you (assuming all 52-year-old Delta pilots are younger than you with no attrition), you'll retire at number 315. We don't know the size of the combined carrier in 13 years, but using today's numbers, you'd retire at 2.52% after the SLI vs. 0.175% at standalone NWA. Sure, percentage-wise, it's a significant difference, but not nearly as big as your initial post made it out to be, especially considering you're already a 744 captain.
I'll let the junior NWA guys chime in with their opinions on the raw deal you'll be getting, forced to spend the next 13 years plying the Pacific at the top of the payscale.
Last edited by StripAlert; 04-17-2008 at 11:57 AM.
#117
Here's a question. If we go off DOH, will Green book guys suddenly have seniority over many of the Red book guys. I have heard that there are many -9 and 320 Capts who could easily hold the -400 Capt. position.
If that happens, it will be the final revenge of the Green book guys. The DAL/WA merger has already been factored. But my question is that if DOH trumps the ration integration, will that be retroactive at NWA since the list is based off two books.
If that happens, it will be the final revenge of the Green book guys. The DAL/WA merger has already been factored. But my question is that if DOH trumps the ration integration, will that be retroactive at NWA since the list is based off two books.
#118
Here's a question. If we go off DOH, will Green book guys suddenly have seniority over many of the Red book guys. I have heard that there are many -9 and 320 Capts who could easily hold the -400 Capt. position.
If that happens, it will be the final revenge of the Green book guys. The DAL/WA merger has already been factored. But my question is that if DOH trumps the ration integration, will that be retroactive at NWA since the list is based off two books.
If that happens, it will be the final revenge of the Green book guys. The DAL/WA merger has already been factored. But my question is that if DOH trumps the ration integration, will that be retroactive at NWA since the list is based off two books.
Personally I feel the unlimited recall rights needs to go. Something closer to 18 months would be more than fair in my book.
Last edited by NWA320pilot; 04-17-2008 at 11:57 AM.
#119
The Green/Red Roberts award is done and over...... That being said NWA has recall rights to equipment for ever as long as you keep it on your bid card. Thus junior guys whom have been bumped from one aircraft can get back on it prior to a new award going to a green book pilot.
Personally I feel the unlimited recall rights needs to go. Something closer to 18 months would be more than fair in my book.
Personally I feel the unlimited recall rights needs to go. Something closer to 18 months would be more than fair in my book.
#120
I think Carl has been pretty non-emotional, to be honest. Pretty good discussion about this so far.
Pretty impressive to be so senior, AND to be comfortable using computers and the "interweb".
Hopefully this all gets worked out sooner rather than later so we can all have more beer money.
Pretty impressive to be so senior, AND to be comfortable using computers and the "interweb".
Hopefully this all gets worked out sooner rather than later so we can all have more beer money.
Carl