Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Narrow Body Fleet Plans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-28-2008, 03:51 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default Narrow Body Fleet Plans

Here is some info on planned narrow body fleet changes after the merger. Some of it is good news most not so good.
The DC-9's will continue to be retired and the category shut down sometime in 2012. There will be 62 airframes left on 1 Jan. No airframes will come back to the line once retired. CASM very high.
MD-90 is still a player if Delta can locate at least 34 airframes. If not and the fleet can't be brought up to around 50 aircraft then the current 16 MD-90's will be retired. If they find enough MD-90 airframes and make the purchase some MD-88's will be retired so it will not be a net gain of 34 airframes.
737-700 fleet will increase to about 20 airframes. No plans beyond that. Aircraft purchased for specific airports and long thin routes. Any additional 737's will be 800's.
757's parked this fall at Delta will be brought back with modified FMC's (goodbye 200k boxes) in the Spring if bookings continue to hold up. Did not mention the parked NWA 757's however may have meant all of them also.
Here is the real bad news. There are no plans for a 100 seat aircraft. Looking at the Bombardiar C series however current plan is to use 76 seat regional jets in that market. Watch for the company to try and trade scope relief for contract changes to allow more in the 2011 time frame. (We should not even think about it!)
737-800's will see more deliveries but limited numbers. Number to arrive will depend on the timing of the next generation airframes from Boeing and Airbus. If those programs get pushed back again look for more 800's. If not then Delta would like to make due with the current fleet and MD-90's until that aircraft comes available in 2018.
Overall not a lot of fleet growth on the narrow body side and we may see a net loss of a small number of airframes depending on the MD-90's. If bookings hold up could be a small increase but nothing huge.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 04:38 AM
  #2  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

From what I am hearing some of that is good info some of it is not....
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 06:06 AM
  #3  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
From what I am hearing some of that is good info some of it is not....
And all of it is subject to change on a moments notice.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 06:21 AM
  #4  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Thanks for the minutes from your monthly pow-wow with DAL management. I'm sure this is from a very accurate source.

I think that MD90 rumor's been going strong for over 2 years now.

Last edited by johnso29; 10-28-2008 at 06:28 AM.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 06:22 AM
  #5  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Hey where did you buy your crystal ball at? I am looking for one myself but haven't decided on which model to go with. thanks again on the fleet update I have no doubt it's from a solid "source".

It's cute that you post your rumors as fact.

Last edited by Superpilot92; 10-28-2008 at 06:42 AM.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 07:33 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tomcat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: 320B
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
Here is the real bad news. There are no plans for a 100 seat aircraft. Looking at the Bombardiar C series however current plan is to use 76 seat regional jets in that market. Watch for the company to try and trade scope relief for contract changes to allow more in the 2011 time frame. (We should not even think about it!)
The LAX LEC is holding elections right now and this is one of the issues that I have discussed with the nominees. Since I arrived at Delta in 2000, I've seen the Captain seats leaving on what seems like a daily basis.

We will see many changes to Delta and our union during the merger, but I strongly believe that the former NWA pilots will perhaps bring a stong resolve on the scope issue and change our union for the better. From what I understand NWA tried to get the 100 seat aircraft at Compass but the pilot group stood strong. Thank you and I look forward to flying with you guys.

V/R, Tomcat

Last edited by Tomcat; 10-28-2008 at 07:38 AM.
Tomcat is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:11 AM
  #7  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
And all of it is subject to change on a moments notice.

Scoop
Oh I know. And it has.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 08:24 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Tomcat View Post
The LAX LEC is holding elections right now and this is one of the issues that I have discussed with the nominees. Since I arrived at Delta in 2000, I've seen the Captain seats leaving on what seems like a daily basis.

We will see many changes to Delta and our union during the merger, but I strongly believe that the former NWA pilots will perhaps bring a stong resolve on the scope issue and change our union for the better. From what I understand NWA tried to get the 100 seat aircraft at Compass but the pilot group stood strong. Thank you and I look forward to flying with you guys.

V/R, Tomcat
They may have stood strong on the 100 seat issue but they caved on the 76 seat issue and they had pilots on the street at the time.

To have management think that they can come to any pilot group and ask for scope relief is a complete failure of our unions.
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 10:36 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tomcat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: 320B
Posts: 511
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton View Post
They may have stood strong on the 100 seat issue but they caved on the 76 seat issue and they had pilots on the street at the time.

To have management think that they can come to any pilot group and ask for scope relief is a complete failure of our unions.
Eric,

couldn't agree with you more....... My LEC Officers know me, our MEC chairman knows me. I try to be very visible on this issue. We have failed on this issue numerous times. I strongly believe that's it's up to all of us to hold our union reps accountable on scope.

If you pick up Avaition Week, on any given week you'll see that the next big push by aircraft manufacturers and management is the 90-120 seat range. We better be prepared as a union, because the battle is rapidly approaching. This issue will be packaged in fear and division and we will be told that the company must have relief on scope to be financially viable. I'm not buying it! We are competitive for the CRJ-900, EMB-190/195 and we must keep this flying at mainline.

Tomcat
Tomcat is offline  
Old 10-28-2008, 11:46 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dtfl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Work
Posts: 506
Default

Originally Posted by Tomcat View Post

If you pick up Avaition Week, on any given week you'll see that the next big push by aircraft manufacturers and management is the 90-120 seat range. We better be prepared as a union, because the battle is rapidly approaching. This issue will be packaged in fear and division and we will be told that the company must have relief on scope to be financially viable. I'm not buying it! We are competitive for the CRJ-900, EMB-190/195 and we must keep this flying at mainline.

Tomcat
AMEN. We have the -900 on our payscales...and that is a start, although I'd rather replace that POS with the EMBs myself...thos jets need to be mainline.
Period.
dtfl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wasatch Phantom
Major
12
08-19-2008 04:04 AM
shane123
Major
15
08-08-2008 09:42 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-28-2005 10:03 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices