Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
What are "prevailing equities" >

What are "prevailing equities"

Search

Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

What are "prevailing equities"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-2008 | 01:25 AM
  #101  
Jay5150's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: 330 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92
Payrates are meaningless when comparing because all of the rates, including the "new" ones are concessionary rates.
Um no...

When my mortgage is due my payrate is most decidedly not meaningless. How your pilot group came to arrive at their rate may be water under the bridge, but what that rate currently stands at is huge. Both in QOL and what they may or may not bring to the table. As long as one of the companies involved in a merger is not "circling the bowl" as neither of us are, then from where I stand it matters not how much NW or DL made in the last quarter. I care about how much of that profit you saw in your paycheck. DAL's quarterly reports don't mean a damn to me as long as they are black. What my W-2 says reflects the QOL of my wife & kids. So I expect that W-2 and QOL to stay exactly the same or better than they were before.

Why wouldn't they? This aquisition is a good thing for everybody right?
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 03:43 AM
  #102  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 54
From: 765A
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
We've been over this already Xray. Consistent with ALPA merger policy is different from being IN ALPA merger policy. This arbitration is outside the process. We're plowing new ground
yeah, keep believing that. You know, of all the stuff I have read by NWA pilots on various forums, you are the only one who seems to think that ALPA merger policy does not apply here.

Last edited by Xray678; 11-04-2008 at 03:58 AM.
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 05:36 AM
  #103  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
If in the future we get the A380 or something like it,
Carl,
You really need to start understanding the mindset of the Delta bureaucracy. Regardless of the fact that RA was former NW and half the senior executive suite is former NW, the management minions, much like the eunuchs of the old Chinese Emperors, are the true decision makers.

The ATL airport is incapable of handling the A380, and there are no plans to ever modify the infastructure to do so. Accordingly, DL will not operate the A380 because, even though LAX and JFK can handle it, ATL can't and therefore DL's eunuchs, not being able to see beyond the borders of their fiefdoms, will determine that we don't need it.
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 06:59 AM
  #104  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

The 380 is like the Concorde, just bigger. It is built and owned for reasons of national pride. It isn't a money maker.

If it was about profit, do you think Airlines would be installing hotel rooms, showers, a jacuzzi and spa facilities?

Delta is here to make money. We need it to make money.
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 12:00 PM
  #105  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

disregard...
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 09:13 PM
  #106  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

[QUOTE=Scoop;491522]
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I can promise you one thing Scoop - NWA pilots ratified the JCBA IN SPITE of the way those pay rates combined aircraft. The 747 being paid the same as a 777 even though the 747 carries over 100 more passengers made it pretty clear that DAL couldn't tolerate NWA operating an aircraft that would pay more than a 777. It was made all the more grating now that DALPA has made pay part of the equation for the SLI proposal.

Carl,
The only other US passenger carrier that flies both the 747 and 777 is UAL and guess what the pay rate is? The same! This rate was calculated by a single unified ALPA Pilot group who realized the 777 is the future and 747 is the past. Why would the UAL pilot group commit such a travesty? Could they not see what the NW pilots see, which is what exactly, that compensation should be based on seats exclusivley and not take other factors such as the newest equipment into account.? I hope not, because planes are certianly going to keep getting newer but not necessarily bigger.
And Super it was the same before the concessions. Lets face it the 747 was the biggest and best in 1970, now its just big and old. It is no longer the biggest, it doesn't fly the farthest or carry the most. In its heday it was the King, the biggest baddest thing around but then again thats when the F-4 ruled the skies.

Scoop
Scoop wasn't the travesty the concessionary contract that brought the 2 payscales together?

I thought United used to max out at around $350 for the 747 and around $300 for the 777 prior to the concessions?
Reply
Old 11-04-2008 | 09:19 PM
  #107  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Nu,
Why should the 330 be paired with the 777? Current 12 year Capt rates are:
A 330 - $162/hour
767-400 $181/hour

Joint payrates ratified overwhelmingly by NW Pilots:

A 330- $182
767-400 $ 189


Unless its that "Super Premium" factor which we cannot put a price on. As a matter of fact its "priceless."

Scoop
Why would there be two different payrates for those airplanes?

Isn't the A330-300 actually larger than both the 767-400 and 777?
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 03:57 AM
  #108  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 54
From: 765A
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
Why would there be two different payrates for those airplanes?

Isn't the A330-300 actually larger than both the 767-400 and 777?
max T/O weight for the A330-300 is about 507,000. Max T/O for the 777 is about 750,000. For the 764 its about 450,000.
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 06:22 AM
  #109  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,264
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

[quote=Eric Stratton;492045]
Originally Posted by Scoop

Scoop wasn't the travesty the concessionary contract that brought the 2 payscales together?

I thought United used to max out at around $350 for the 747 and around $300 for the 777 prior to the concessions?
Eric,
The concessions lowered all payrates the same %.

Scoop
Reply
Old 11-05-2008 | 07:55 AM
  #110  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
max T/O weight for the A330-300 is about 507,000. Max T/O for the 777 is about 750,000. For the 764 its about 450,000.
I was thinking seating capacity over T/O weight.

That still doesn't explain why there is a pay difference between the A330 and 764.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices