Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
MEC to push for DAL-N Call in Honest policy >

MEC to push for DAL-N Call in Honest policy

Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

MEC to push for DAL-N Call in Honest policy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2009, 05:55 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

Thanks. That could be something we can work on.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 05-23-2009, 08:11 AM
  #22  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

The MEC needs to start reading the bathroom walls in here. I brought up the "Call in Honest" policy in another thread back in December of last year. Several other issues have appeared in here from other pilots that should have been addressed much earlier.

As an aside, I also brought up the crew rest facility on the A330 and was assured that the DAL-S guys were hardcore about the issue, that I was premature in mentioning it, and that it would be handled before 4 pilot crews appeared on the 330. Guess thats why we are flying over 12 hour legs from LAX-NRT with 3 pilots and no rest facility for 4 pilots. (I blame DAL-N guys for this...)

MEC if you are listening, get the "Call in Honest" policy (DAL-N) into our contract!
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 05-23-2009, 10:20 AM
  #23  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149 View Post
Nosmo King, Flew with Carlson once.................<chirp chirp>

Ferd
Does that mean Jeff didn't talk much?

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-23-2009, 10:34 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ferd149's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: LAX ERA
Posts: 3,457
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Does that mean Jeff didn't talk much?

Carl
Nope, sure didn't. Would answer a question, if asked, but it was a long leg from DEN to MSP. Pete Moore, on the other hand, would talk non-stop.

Ferd
Ferd149 is offline  
Old 05-23-2009, 12:31 PM
  #25  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149 View Post
Nope, sure didn't. Would answer a question, if asked, but it was a long leg from DEN to MSP. Pete Moore, on the other hand, would talk non-stop.

Ferd
I don't know what's worse...Jeff not saying anything, or Pete saying anything!

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 05-23-2009, 04:42 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Nosmo King View Post
The MEC needs to start reading the bathroom walls in here. I brought up the "Call in Honest" policy in another thread back in December of last year. Several other issues have appeared in here from other pilots that should have been addressed much earlier.

As an aside, I also brought up the crew rest facility on the A330 and was assured that the DAL-S guys were hardcore about the issue, that I was premature in mentioning it, and that it would be handled before 4 pilot crews appeared on the 330. Guess thats why we are flying over 12 hour legs from LAX-NRT with 3 pilots and no rest facility for 4 pilots. (I blame DAL-N guys for this...)

MEC if you are listening, get the "Call in Honest" policy (DAL-N) into our contract!

If the LAX NRT flight exceeds 12 hours it is a FAR violation as well as a contractual violation. The FAA requires 4 pilots and a horizontal rest facility on any flight that exceed 12 hours block time more then 30 percent of the time. The FAA has never given Delta a inch on this and has threatened to shut down several flights that were exceeding the 30 percent. SVO-ATL is a great example. Delta had to get the flight priority into ATL for the arrival flow as well as taxi and parking to make the numbers or we were going to be shut down. If you have knowledge that the flight is not in compliance with FAR's please call the FAA safety hotline and DALPA.

added via edit: I took a look at the block times. The flight is blocked at 11:55. Another airline leaves LAX for NRT at almost the same time and they block their flight for 11:30. Even if the 330 flew as much as .04 mach slower the time seems reasonable. The 30 percent rule is applied over a 90 day window. If at the end of 90 days the flight is out of compliance by even 1 percentage point I can assure you DALPA will be all over it. I don't have access to NWA data. You should however have that access. You can pull all the rotations since the 330 picked up the route and find out what the actual block times are coming in at. If they are over 12 hours more then 30 percent of the time give your reps a heads up. At the end of 90 days the 330 will be removed from the route if its out of compliance.

Last edited by sailingfun; 05-24-2009 at 04:04 AM.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 04:54 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

I can't check history only the last flight. On 24 May the flight blocked 11:32 from LAX-NRT.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 08:26 AM
  #28  
Inventory survival kit ..
 
Nosmo King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Posts: 1,069
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
If the LAX NRT flight exceeds 12 hours it is a FAR violation as well as a contractual violation. The FAA requires 4 pilots and a horizontal rest facility on any flight that exceed 12 hours block time more then 30 percent of the time. The FAA has never given Delta a inch on this and has threatened to shut down several flights that were exceeding the 30 percent. SVO-ATL is a great example. Delta had to get the flight priority into ATL for the arrival flow as well as taxi and parking to make the numbers or we were going to be shut down. If you have knowledge that the flight is not in compliance with FAR's please call the FAA safety hotline and DALPA.

added via edit: I took a look at the block times. The flight is blocked at 11:55. Another airline leaves LAX for NRT at almost the same time and they block their flight for 11:30. Even if the 330 flew as much as .04 mach slower the time seems reasonable. The 30 percent rule is applied over a 90 day window. If at the end of 90 days the flight is out of compliance by even 1 percentage point I can assure you DALPA will be all over it. I don't have access to NWA data. You should however have that access. You can pull all the rotations since the 330 picked up the route and find out what the actual block times are coming in at. If they are over 12 hours more then 30 percent of the time give your reps a heads up. At the end of 90 days the 330 will be removed from the route if its out of compliance.
The numbers I was given from ALPA Contract Admin and LEC reps. 6 month data window and segment must exceed 12 hours over 75% of the data window before the FAA will force management to double crew.

Flight segment time for a 747-400 LAX-NRT block to block is 11:40 in the NW timetable and on our printed patterns (last week of March). 747-400 cruises at .86 mach. A330 cruises at 0.82 mach using a wing designed for 0.80 mach. When NW bought the A330 we bought a "performance guarantee" for fuel comsumption at cost index 100 (~0.82mach), Pushing the wing to 0.83 results in significant fuel burn increase. Company claimed that the A330 could "get off the ground faster than a 747-400" to make block to block of 11:55 on the same segment that a 747-400 did in 11:40, but freely admitted that using common taxi times, the A330 block to block time would be over 12 hours. You can do the math if you are reasonably proficient at algebra. 11:40 at 0.86M = >12:00 at 0.82M

This was all covered in another thread.

For winter months there is no debate, A330 block time WILL exceed 12 hours. This will be a moot point for the rest of the summer as the 747-400 is being reassigned to LAX-NRT in June, bu the issue is still out there until the initial database is established for the A330.

Edit: For Jun the segment time (as expected) is 11:10 for a 747-400. In PARS the actual block out/in times disappear after one day and are replaced with the scheduled block times.

Last edited by Nosmo King; 05-25-2009 at 08:40 AM.
Nosmo King is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 10:13 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dtfl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Work
Posts: 506
Default

Originally Posted by Nosmo King View Post
The MEC needs to start reading the bathroom walls in here. I brought up the "Call in Honest" policy in another thread back in December of last year. Several other issues have appeared in here from other pilots that should have been addressed much earlier.
I've been told by senior guys here at DAL S that commuting "is a choice".(They DON'T.) So there won't be a lot of support from older guys here, in my opinion...maybe I'm wrong.
dtfl is offline  
Old 05-25-2009, 10:46 AM
  #30  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by dtfl View Post
I've been told by senior guys here at DAL S that commuting "is a choice".(They DON'T.) So there won't be a lot of support from older guys here, in my opinion...maybe I'm wrong.
Well...fortunately, the older guys aint the majority. My bet is commuters will be the majority. The only question will be if the MEC cares at all what the pilots think.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
jagplt
Cargo
28
11-05-2008 09:58 AM
captexpress
Cargo
7
11-04-2008 03:43 AM
paxhauler85
Regional
177
11-02-2008 10:55 PM
DAL4EVER
Mergers and Acquisitions
12
10-18-2008 01:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices