Mesa Air Group Chapter 11 Info
#551
ToiletDuck,
Delta already "dropped" MAG by terminating their ERJ contract in March 2008 and their CRJ-900 contract in August 2008.
Mesa brought civil action in the Georgia District Court concerning the ERJ's and won an injunction. This is the "ERJ Litigation" (Mesa Airlines, Inc. and Freedom Airlines, Inc. vs. Delta Airlines Inc. Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-1334-CC). Delta appealed in the Georgia Court of Appeals and lost the appeal.
MAG has since submitted a motion to assume the contract in the New York Bankruptcy Court and, against Delta's hopes, the case has subsequently been transferred from the Georgia District Court to the New York Bankruptcy Court. The court date is currently scheduled for July 12th, 2010. The result is that Delta is now bound by a court injunction to honor their executory contract until either Mesa assumes the contract in reorganization or the contract expires.
There are other cases pending in the Georgia District Court:
"MFN Litigation" (Delta Airlines, Inc. vs. Mesa Airlines, Inc. and Freedom Airlines, Inc. Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-1334-CC)
The "MFN Litigation" concerns the "Most Favored Nation" provision of the contract. MFN provisions effectively guarantee that sub-contractors don't out price the "lowest bidder". Delta claims that MAG is charging $1.5 million a month more than Pinnacle Airlines and that the MFN provision guaranteed that MAG would be the lowest cost Delta Connection operator. MAG in turn claims; Delta hasn't been properly utilizing their aircraft on a "full-time basis"; Delta refuses to engage in the annual rate setting procedures; attorneys' fees; costs; and "other damages". This case is currently scheduled in the Georgia District Court for April 20th, 2010.
MAG also commenced an action in the Georgia District Court concerning the cancellation of the Delta CRJ-900 agreement (These were the 14 NexGen CRJ-900's owned by Delta to be operated by MAG. MAG only flew seven of them from Nov. 2007 to Aug. 2008). The "Delta CRJ Litigation" seeks damages for lost profits and training costs. Delta, of course, filed a counterclaim for "failure to meet contract conditions".
Yet another action exists in the Arizona District Court:
This case, the "Engine Litigation", was filed by MAG seeking the return of seven engines that Delta took posession of. Delta agreed to return the engines but then filed a mechanics lien and a counterclaim to foreclose on the liens. The Court ruled that Delta had forfeited its claims and Delta appealed. The appeals case is pending.
These cases, especially the "ERJ and MFN litigation", are key to the reorganization of MAG and were the primary reasons for the timing of the bankruptcy filing. Until these cases are concluded, or a settlement is reached, MAG's bankruptcy case will effectively be in limbo.
winglet
Delta already "dropped" MAG by terminating their ERJ contract in March 2008 and their CRJ-900 contract in August 2008.
Mesa brought civil action in the Georgia District Court concerning the ERJ's and won an injunction. This is the "ERJ Litigation" (Mesa Airlines, Inc. and Freedom Airlines, Inc. vs. Delta Airlines Inc. Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-1334-CC). Delta appealed in the Georgia Court of Appeals and lost the appeal.
MAG has since submitted a motion to assume the contract in the New York Bankruptcy Court and, against Delta's hopes, the case has subsequently been transferred from the Georgia District Court to the New York Bankruptcy Court. The court date is currently scheduled for July 12th, 2010. The result is that Delta is now bound by a court injunction to honor their executory contract until either Mesa assumes the contract in reorganization or the contract expires.
There are other cases pending in the Georgia District Court:
"MFN Litigation" (Delta Airlines, Inc. vs. Mesa Airlines, Inc. and Freedom Airlines, Inc. Civil Action No. 1:08-CV-1334-CC)
The "MFN Litigation" concerns the "Most Favored Nation" provision of the contract. MFN provisions effectively guarantee that sub-contractors don't out price the "lowest bidder". Delta claims that MAG is charging $1.5 million a month more than Pinnacle Airlines and that the MFN provision guaranteed that MAG would be the lowest cost Delta Connection operator. MAG in turn claims; Delta hasn't been properly utilizing their aircraft on a "full-time basis"; Delta refuses to engage in the annual rate setting procedures; attorneys' fees; costs; and "other damages". This case is currently scheduled in the Georgia District Court for April 20th, 2010.
MAG also commenced an action in the Georgia District Court concerning the cancellation of the Delta CRJ-900 agreement (These were the 14 NexGen CRJ-900's owned by Delta to be operated by MAG. MAG only flew seven of them from Nov. 2007 to Aug. 2008). The "Delta CRJ Litigation" seeks damages for lost profits and training costs. Delta, of course, filed a counterclaim for "failure to meet contract conditions".
Yet another action exists in the Arizona District Court:
This case, the "Engine Litigation", was filed by MAG seeking the return of seven engines that Delta took posession of. Delta agreed to return the engines but then filed a mechanics lien and a counterclaim to foreclose on the liens. The Court ruled that Delta had forfeited its claims and Delta appealed. The appeals case is pending.
These cases, especially the "ERJ and MFN litigation", are key to the reorganization of MAG and were the primary reasons for the timing of the bankruptcy filing. Until these cases are concluded, or a settlement is reached, MAG's bankruptcy case will effectively be in limbo.
winglet
#552
Good catch! You are absolutely correct. Sorry, I got in a hurry with editing. I've corrected my post.
winglet
Last edited by winglet; 03-16-2010 at 06:35 AM.
#553
#555
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: ERJ CA
I think 1000 pilots is the target number and we currently have about 1075 on the seniority list.
#556
Yesterday (March 16th) MAG presented a motion to extend the time to disclose the books. They are asking for March 26th, 2010 due to the number of creditors and "complexities" of the case.
The MOR should also be coming out at about the same time.
winglet
Last edited by winglet; 03-17-2010 at 07:04 AM.
#557
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
I have heard the rumor that the June furlough was just postponed. That would mean that the 20 or so on April 1st and the 65 on May 1st are still going to happen but that would bring us down to the projected 1000 total pilots.
#558
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: ERJ CA
Well unless I received my furlough notice while I've been gone on this trip, I don't think any furloughs are going to happen on April 1st, since I'm practically at the bottom of the list.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



