Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)

- Mesa Airlines (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/mesa-airlines/)

- - Mesa E-jet? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/mesa-airlines/75570-mesa-e-jet.html)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salukipilot4590 (Post 1432063)

What did Tall guy do?

Why am I not in on this?

Apparently I ask way too many questions and am indecisive.

I also state obvious things like one might want to go to SkyWest over Mesa.

Controversial stuff.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TallFlyer (Post 1432104)

Apparently I ask way too many questions and am indecisive.

I also state obvious things like one might want to go to SkyWest over Mesa.

Controversial stuff.

Did you forget you're on a forum..... Anyone is a know it all on here, including the 13 year old kid typing while listening to the biebs...

Dude, how did you know what I was listening to? ;)

Quote:

Makes sense. Give the worst performer, operationally speaking, the new flying.

What?! YV is constantly top one or two performer each month on the UAX side.

Quote:

Originally Posted by prior121 (Post 1432138)

What?! YV is constantly top one or two performer each month on the UAX side.

That's because they don't operate nearly as many flights as OO and EV into busier airports filled with delays and flows.

Quote:

Originally Posted by prior121 (Post 1432138)

What?! YV is constantly top one or two performer each month on the UAX side.

That's because they don't operate nearly as many flights as OO and EV into busier airports filled with delays and flows.

Their two United bases areORD and IAD with almost all UAX flights originating or ending in either of the two, check your facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nevets (Post 1432047)

They only need to reduce the 50 seat jets IF they exceed 153 76 seat jets. And that requires them to purchase new SNB aircraft. With that said, they don't need leverage to get rid of ALL of XJT's 50 seat jets. They will automatically come off as leases expire.

Below is straight from their TA Summary which shows a hard cap on UAX ships of 450.......? However my math was wrong, it's not 165 that need to be removed, it's 168.

SCOPE
Very broadly, Scope establishes United pilot flying protections and at the same time allows the Company to generate certain revenue through connections with operations conducted by other air carriers (where the flying is not flown by United pilots). One of the most complex tasks faced with the JCBA was to not only modernize the Scope section, but to also cover the spectrum from United Express flying to international joint ventures. The legacy Continental Scope section was used as the basis for this section in the TA, beginning with a definition of Company Flying that preserves all flying for United pilots unless the flying is included within agreed-upon exceptions.

• UAX (Express flying) block hour ratio restriction based on narrowbody single-aisle block hours at DOS
• No 76-seat aircraft until Jan. 1, 2014; current legacy United 70-seat and turboprop limits until then
- After Jan 1, 2014: Cap 70-/76-seat aircraft at 255 hulls; no more than 130 76-seat aircraft
- Q400 included in 76-seat aircraft count limits (currently no limit in legacy Continental contract)
- UAL currently has 148 70-seat aircraft and 35 Q400s
- Under JCBA definitions, UAL currently has 183 of the 255 70/76-seat aircraft
• After Jan. 1, 2016: Cap 76-seat aircraft at 153
• Can only go above 153 76-seat aircraft if new small narrowbody aircraft added to UAL fleet and forces reduction of 70-seat aircraft from 148 to 102 cap
• Must park 50-seat aircraft if going above 153 76-seat aircraft
• Maximum UAX hard cap of 450 total hulls, from current 588
• All 76-seat aircraft downgraded to 70-seats (remove seats) if furlough
• New small narrowbody aircraft – we fly it, forces reduction in UAX block hour ratio limit and number of 50- seat aircraft

I knew he'd show up!!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slats (Post 1432144)

That's because they don't operate nearly as many flights as OO and EV into busier airports filled with delays and flows.

What's really sad about your "church of latter days saints" Salt Lake City "brainwash." Is that I take it you were told you were better than everyone else or you did you really just come up with that yourself?

But the thing I really find odd(SLATS) is that judging by your join date/DOH and demeanor you probably have never even touched a plane with SLATS?

<<<<<- Btw..... Look at that azzzzzzzz. BoOm bOOM POW!!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrisBluer (Post 1432292)

<- Btw..... Look at that azzzzzzzz. BoOm bOOM POW!!!!

I'm sorry what? We don't see *** like that in UT... But man, we need to hire some :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by prior121 (Post 1432149)

Their two United bases areORD and IAD with almost all UAX flights originating or ending in either of the two, check your facts.

Yes I know you operate into ord and iad, but Mesa doesn't nearly operate the same volume as OO/EV. 50 odd planes compared to what 300+ planes operating ord, iad, iah, den ect... Having lesser volume does help with the stats is all I am trying to say.