New Mesa Thread
#5722
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
They were downgraded since they weren't qualified to occupy the seat. I don't have a list of names involved, but at least the handful that I know of re-upgraded later. The company self disclosed to the FAA, and now we mostly have feds doing fed rides instead of OEO's as a result.
#5724
Dumb Pilot
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
They were downgraded since they weren't qualified to occupy the seat. I don't have a list of names involved, but at least the handful that I know of re-upgraded later. The company self disclosed to the FAA, and now we mostly have feds doing fed rides instead of OEO's as a result.
#5726
Hold on for a minute there....most of those involved weren't trying to cheat the system by upgrading without the required time. Many were prior 135 guys that came from a scheduled operation. They submitted their upgrade sheet and the company accepted that time as being applicable for upgrade based off the upgrade worksheet in use at that time. After the tail strike incident the FAA dug pretty deep into all recent upgrades, and upon review of the new rules per Part 117 they determined that those candidates did not meet the requirements. Is it embarrassing? Yes. Was it frustrating for those involved? Yes! But to insinuate that those guys should be fired for a paperwork error after successfully completing an 121 approved upgrade program is a bit of a stretch....don't you think? For the record....the guy who had the tail strike wasn't egregiously shy of the 1000 hours required. Like the others, he had submitted his upgrade worksheet and it was approved. After the incident the FAA examined his times and found him to be approximately 15 hours short due to ferry flights that had been conducted under Part 91. Thats essentially what started the domino effect. And don't forget, before people start the whole "1000 hours 121, not experienced enough to be a Captain" rant, prior to the 117 rules taking effect all you needed to be a Captain in a 121 operation was an ATP and a PIC type. So guys with 1501 hours were upgrading not all that long ago at various operators.
#5727
Some airlines like the knee jerk reaction of destroying some ones career, at Mesa, you take responsibility for your mistakes or lack of judgement(reference the pilots using projected time instead of actual time on the upgrade), are sincere about it, blame no one else for it, and you'll probably still have a job at the end of the day. I know this must infuriate the flying nazi, elitist type A, superiority complexed, main line crj driving wholly owned pilots out there, but too bad!
#5728
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Hold on for a minute there....most of those involved weren't trying to cheat the system by upgrading without the required time. Many were prior 135 guys that came from a scheduled operation. They submitted their upgrade sheet and the company accepted that time as being applicable for upgrade based off the upgrade worksheet in use at that time. After the tail strike incident the FAA dug pretty deep into all recent upgrades, and upon review of the new rules per Part 117 they determined that those candidates did not meet the requirements. Is it embarrassing? Yes. Was it frustrating for those involved? Yes! But to insinuate that those guys should be fired for a paperwork error after successfully completing an 121 approved upgrade program is a bit of a stretch....don't you think? For the record....the guy who had the tail strike wasn't egregiously shy of the 1000 hours required. Like the others, he had submitted his upgrade worksheet and it was approved. After the incident the FAA examined his times and found him to be approximately 15 hours short due to ferry flights that had been conducted under Part 91. Thats essentially what started the domino effect. And don't forget, before people start the whole "1000 hours 121, not experienced enough to be a Captain" rant, prior to the 117 rules taking effect all you needed to be a Captain in a 121 operation was an ATP and a PIC type. So guys with 1501 hours were upgrading not all that long ago at various operators.
I'm not saying they should have been fired but we live and die by regs that we are expected to know and understand. 117 rules included.
#5729
Dumb Pilot
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
Hold on for a minute there....most of those involved weren't trying to cheat the system by upgrading without the required time. Many were prior 135 guys that came from a scheduled operation. They submitted their upgrade sheet and the company accepted that time as being applicable for upgrade based off the upgrade worksheet in use at that time. After the tail strike incident the FAA dug pretty deep into all recent upgrades, and upon review of the new rules per Part 117 they determined that those candidates did not meet the requirements. Is it embarrassing? Yes. Was it frustrating for those involved? Yes! But to insinuate that those guys should be fired for a paperwork error after successfully completing an 121 approved upgrade program is a bit of a stretch....don't you think? For the record....the guy who had the tail strike wasn't egregiously shy of the 1000 hours required. Like the others, he had submitted his upgrade worksheet and it was approved. After the incident the FAA examined his times and found him to be approximately 15 hours short due to ferry flights that had been conducted under Part 91. Thats essentially what started the domino effect. And don't forget, before people start the whole "1000 hours 121, not experienced enough to be a Captain" rant, prior to the 117 rules taking effect all you needed to be a Captain in a 121 operation was an ATP and a PIC type. So guys with 1501 hours were upgrading not all that long ago at various operators.
#5730
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Does anyone know how long upgrade for a new hire hired today would be? And is it based on growth or attrition, etc.?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



