![]() |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 1988624)
To clarify things... 15 are owned by United, we are getting 15 more that we will own. 15 + 15 = 30. We will be operating 30 ejets, and very likely, ejets for American down the road... What survives a nuclear war? Cockroaches and Mesa. Get over it, be haters, we are not going away any time soon...
Total being 45 Ejets operated for the UAX codeshare. Unfortunately you didn't clarify a thing. Lol |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 1988624)
To clarify things... 15 are owned by United, we are getting 15 more that we will own. 15 + 15 = 30. We will be operating 30 ejets, and very likely, ejets for American down the road... What survives a nuclear war? Cockroaches and Mesa. Get over it, be haters, we are not going away any time soon...
|
Originally Posted by Darant
(Post 1988535)
There's nothing different about our creditors vs that of Skywest or Republic. Except maybe we have a higher interest rate ;)
Those are called lenders not creditors |
Originally Posted by WakeWash
(Post 1988667)
You just compared yourself to cockroaches, nice. American stated it was wanting to bring flying in house, and is already sending its 175s to envoy. Where do you figure you'll be flying some for American? Mesa is already doing a poor job of flying their stuff on the crj side as it is. If anything Mesa will lose its American flying over time and go to just United work.
American owes a good percentage of Mesa I think 20 percent ownership coming out of BK Think think and think again |
Originally Posted by headchief
(Post 1986824)
Are they going to lower the crosswind component to less than 10?
I don't care who you are. That's pretty funny! |
Originally Posted by captlonestar
(Post 1987188)
Wow, you are really proud of Mesa. For a company that's main requirement to get hired is a pulse I think your response is comical. You're either really ignorant and inexperienced or just plain dumb. Don't take it personally but Mesa sucks and that's a fact. I'm impressed y'all voted no for that horrible TA, but I can't imagine you had the balls to vote no.
|
Reading this thread is depressing. One group of regional pilots hating on another group. Over and over again we have this back and forth BS. Fighting for scraps while big brother and sister laugh all the way to the bank.
Wow, just wow. |
Originally Posted by pilotwithnoname
(Post 1988772)
Reading this thread is depressing. One group of regional pilots hating on another group. Over and over again we have this back and forth BS. Fighting for scraps while big brother and sister laugh all the way to the bank.
Wow, just wow. Arguing about who's regional airline is better is like arguing who's fresh dump smells worse. Give me a break guys.......were all in the same regional crap boat. I guess it just goes to show the level of immaturity of the current generation of "professional" pilots. Pretty sad. |
Originally Posted by pilotwithnoname
(Post 1988772)
Reading this thread is depressing. One group of regional pilots hating on another group. Over and over again we have this back and forth BS. Fighting for scraps while big brother and sister laugh all the way to the bank.
Wow, just wow. |
Originally Posted by SMACFUM
(Post 1988801)
Yeah the back-and-forth, name calling and bashing on fellow airline pilot colligues is pretty pathetic.
Arguing about who's regional airline is better is like arguing who's fresh dump smells worse. Give me a break guys.......were all in the same regional crap boat. I guess it just goes to show the level of immaturity of the current generation of "professional" pilots. Pretty sad. DH |
Originally Posted by FlameNSky
(Post 1988831)
West Side Gangsta!
My post is simply to explain my position that I think this sibling rivalry in the regionals is useless. People (for the most part) pick their regional because it's convenient to commute to, and would leave at the first hint of being hired at a major. This regional pride/bashing trend is comical. Get in, get out, move on. |
Mesa Airlines to operate 15 more 175s
Regional pilots hate on other regional pilots because of the whipsaw game. Some folks get lucky and get a quick upgrade, but it always comes at the expense of a 7-8 year FO, who had bad luck and their upgrade "stolen". I don't think it's right to act immature, but that's where the hostility originates. And, while not directly the fault of the quick upgrading pilot, it's somewhat justified.
On the subject of 175's for AA, I seriously doubt it. I'm at Envoy and we are really fat on pilots. I'm looking at the DFW reserve list and more that 40 FO's are getting paid to sit at home today. The top half of the list has barely worked the last couple months. They could award us 20 more airplanes tomorrow and we'd have no problem staffing everything, even if we don't end up transferring any thing away. They are spending lots of $$ to get the 175 program up and running here, so they'd put us to work before betting on another airline. Also, AA is nearly scoped out, so there's that. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Also from Training Dept they want to bring all the aa E 175s to envoy, Compass E175, will probably come back to envoy once the contract expires..so true they are spending lots of $$ on the 175 program..
|
Originally Posted by pilotwithnoname
(Post 1988839)
My post is simply to explain my position that I think this sibling rivalry in the regionals is useless. People (for the most part) pick their regional because it's convenient to commute to, and would leave at the first hint of being hired at a major. This regional pride/bashing trend is comical. Get in, get out, move on.
|
Originally Posted by unity2015
(Post 1988895)
Also from Training Dept they want to bring all the aa E 175s to envoy, Compass E175, will probably come back to envoy once the contract expires..so true they are spending lots of $$ on the 175 program..
|
Originally Posted by unity2015
(Post 1988895)
Also from Training Dept they want to bring all the aa E 175s to envoy, Compass E175, will probably come back to envoy once the contract expires..so true they are spending lots of $$ on the 175 program..
|
Are we going to to be flying into ORD next month according to that email?
|
Originally Posted by EjetTaxi
(Post 1989007)
Are we going to to be flying into ORD next month according to that email?
(Filler) |
Originally Posted by Sennant
(Post 1989016)
Huh?
(Filler) "November 1, 2015 we will begin flying into ORD as an outstation again, except this time we will be utilizing the "Aircraft Parking Information System" (APIS)." |
Yes but doesn't specify CR7 or E75.
|
Originally Posted by EjetTaxi
(Post 1989020)
"November 1, 2015 we will begin flying into ORD as an outstation again, except this time we will be utilizing the "Aircraft Parking Information System" (APIS)."
|
Originally Posted by unity2015
(Post 1988895)
Also from Training Dept they want to bring all the aa E 175s to envoy, Compass E175, will probably come back to envoy once the contract expires..so true they are spending lots of $$ on the 175 program..
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 1988624)
To clarify things... 15 are owned by United, we are getting 15 more that we will own. 15 + 15 = 30. We will be operating 30 ejets, and very likely, ejets for American down the road... What survives a nuclear war? Cockroaches and Mesa. Get over it, be haters, we are not going away any time soon...
|
Originally Posted by 20sx
(Post 1989180)
Maybe to clarify this more (or clear as mud)....United earlier this year put out a release that come Spring of 2016 they would hand over 10 Ejets to a regional. And earlier posts on this message board said we were receiving jets from Republic. Also happens that Mesa is purchasing these jets, just like Republic would have. So, maybe these aren't the United bought ones and come next spring there could be another 10-15 from United.
If United MEC accepts a 2 year extension and the pilots ratify it that is negotiate it now with 45 days expiration and that is Nov 20th you may see more 175 s coming but if they don't get a TA on the extension , United is capped to 255 70/76 aircraft max and no more of 153 76 seaters ...that's Max United is offering pay increases and 100-125 aircraft order with 100 seats , furlough longevity back and wants relief on duty extension for ultra long flights since FAR 117 has a lot of restrictions and pilots are not willing to extend their duty time As of 10/10/15 UAL has flying 41 EMB 170 119 CR7 And how many so far 175 not to exceed 95 Unless they remove 70 seaters or add narrow body at mainline Do the math what you have flying , confirm order to fly and there is your numbers and opportunities Don't be fool with the 25 A319s from China and 17 Airbuses coming from Spirit to increase the 175 s that's not complying with the contract and they don't count for scope relief .... Those are used and the contract specific calls for NEW NBs |
Originally Posted by Sniper66
(Post 1989250)
If United MEC accepts a 2 year extension and the pilots ratify it that is negotiate it now with 45 days expiration and that is Nov 20th you may see more 175 s coming but if they don't get a TA on the extension , United is capped to 255 70/76 aircraft max and no more of 153 76 seaters ...that's Max
United is offering pay increases and 100-125 aircraft order with 100 seats , furlough longevity back and wants relief on duty extension for ultra long flights since FAR 117 has a lot of restrictions and pilots are not willing to extend their duty time As of 10/10/15 UAL has flying 41 EMB 170 119 CR7 And how many so far 175 not to exceed 95 Unless they remove 70 seaters or add narrow body at mainline Do the math what you have flying , confirm order to fly and there is your numbers and opportunities Don't be fool with the 25 A319s from China and 17 Airbuses coming from Spirit to increase the 175 s that's not complying with the contract and they don't count for scope relief .... Those are used and the contract specific calls for NEW NBs Holy cow! My grammar isn't top grade by any means, but this is the worst written article in all of time. |
Originally Posted by EjetTaxi
(Post 1989285)
Holy cow! My grammar isn't top grade by any means, but this is the worst written article in all of time.
It is Jonathan , I am Mexican but don't tell Trump. However giving false expectatios to kids for quick upgrade will not fly anymore !!! The TA you offered sucked and I am glad it was shut down !!!! No more dues for H----- More stickers on the way ? |
Originally Posted by 20sx
(Post 1989180)
Maybe to clarify this more (or clear as mud)....United earlier this year put out a release that come Spring of 2016 they would hand over 10 Ejets to a regional. And earlier posts on this message board said we were receiving jets from Republic. Also happens that Mesa is purchasing these jets, just like Republic would have. So, maybe these aren't the United bought ones and come next spring there could be another 10-15 from United.
|
Originally Posted by giggity37
(Post 1987234)
Let's see our final numbers for
June: completion factor- 99.0% DO- 65.3% July: completion factor- 99.2% DO- 69.0% August:Completion factor- 99.60%. DO- 73.80% Still waiting for septembers numbers. These numbers look horrible :rolleyes: |
"The training department isn't responsible for fleet management or even staffing the airline".
Your correct the parent company is, aag basically runs envoy and the other WO.. The training dept, gets their marching orders from big daddy..Parker doesn't like to waste $$.. |
Like I said, 30+15 = 45.
You wholy owns crack me up, truth be told, you are a financial tool to the mainline. If mainline needs to show a financial loss, they throw money at you and life is good. When they need to show strong earnings to stock holders, you eat ****. Enjoy that roller coaster. One day they say you are getting tons of e-jets, and ramping up to take over the world, the next day they shelve it and not give a crap. Small potatoes in the big picture |
Originally Posted by iFlyRC
(Post 1989884)
Like I said, 30+15 = 45.
You wholy owns crack me up, truth be told, you are a financial tool to the mainline. If mainline needs to show a financial loss, they throw money at you and life is good. When they need to show strong earnings to stock holders, you eat ****. Enjoy that roller coaster. One day they say you are getting tons of e-jets, and ramping up to take over the world, the next day they shelve it and not give a crap. Small potatoes in the big picture You are tool used to whipsaw other pilots groups. You must be so proud. |
Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
(Post 1989132)
Lol compass has the cheapest pilot group out there (majority of pilots have been at the company less than 2 years). Parker has diversified his feed hoping to weather a storm. So why would envoy get those planes? Just because a training department wants to do anything outside of train doesn't mean it will happen. The training department isn't responsible for fleet management or even staffing the airline.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by 3inthegreen
(Post 1989939)
Because Compass has the worst YTD Completion Factor, worst D+0, and worst A+14 for all of the 10 carriers flying under American Eagle.
Would like to see the data on that. Sept is a small subset but compass exceed every single number American gave them for completion factor d0 and a14 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by captlonestar
(Post 1989922)
You seriously think that's funny?
You are tool used to whipsaw other pilots groups. You must be so proud. |
Originally Posted by 3inthegreen
(Post 1989939)
Because Compass has the worst YTD Completion Factor, worst D+0, and worst A+14 for all of the 10 carriers flying under American Eagle.
|
Originally Posted by GoHomeLeg
(Post 1989132)
Lol compass has the cheapest pilot group out there (majority of pilots have been at the company less than 2 years). Parker has diversified his feed hoping to weather a storm. So why would envoy get those planes? Just because a training department wants to do anything outside of train doesn't mean it will happen. The training department isn't responsible for fleet management or even staffing the airline.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk Those 175s you are flying were supposed to go to envoy but the lack of a signed pilot contract forced them to find another home for them for the time being. There is a contract in place now. You do the math. |
Originally Posted by Ex lurker
(Post 1990072)
Parker is on record as saying there are four or five to many regionals flying for American.
Those 175s you are flying were supposed to go to envoy but the lack of a signed pilot contract forced them to find another home for them for the time being. There is a contract in place now. You do the math. |
Originally Posted by CBreezy
(Post 1990080)
Parker is also on record as saying there is a need to diversify the feed and hire independent regionals to compete with the other two legacy airlines. Go ahead and add that to the equation.
He always talks about American and its relationship with American Eagle and how it was wrong to have only one regional affiliate and have them such an integral part of mainline. His stated vision is to have five or six regionals that operate as their own companies (even the WO). There are ten now. No matter what you think of Parker what he and Isom say in public has been panning out. |
Originally Posted by Ex lurker
(Post 1990095)
And they did that.
He always talks about American and its relationship with American Eagle and how it was wrong to have only one regional affiliate and have them such an integral part of mainline. His stated vision is to have five or six regionals that operate as their own companies (even the WO). There are ten now. No matter what you think of Parker what he and Isom say in public has been panning out. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands