Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa 3.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2016, 08:41 AM
  #681  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Navmode's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by Santos Dumont View Post
They are 170s. The 175 designator is not recognized by the FAA, it's just a marketing designator. It's a minor technicality, but your comment reads as if they were two considerable different airplanes, and the truth is that there are more differences between a 737-700 and a 737-900 than between a 170-100 an a 170-200 (175 for the public).
Originally Posted by BeatNavy View Post
Jesus H. I know this. I have the type on my little green card. But no one at Mesa I've ever talked to says they fly E170s. E170, while the type on the FAA cert, isn't the name normally used in everyday speech. On the emb website, it doesn't mention it is a E170-200. Everyone except people writing manuals and certificates, to include pilots, use the "marketing" name. Better change your APC position under your name to E170-200 FO.

Everyone else:

Navmode is offline  
Old 09-17-2016, 08:51 AM
  #682  
Gets Weekends Off
 
squawkoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: ????
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by Navmode View Post
Everyone else:

I'm with Navmode on this one.
squawkoff is offline  
Old 09-17-2016, 09:11 AM
  #683  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Well, from the CRJ side of things, it is hard to believe they have that many applications. From the E-jet side which has no lifers, and lots of movement with people getting hired, and continuous upgrades, I believe it. Everyone wants the E-jet, so they can be more selective.
iFlyRC is offline  
Old 09-17-2016, 10:02 AM
  #684  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

Yep, great newsletter. Some of my favorite bits:

The good news here is that we, at Mesa, have exactly the right fleet types on our certificate and none of the smaller, less efficient airplanes. As a result, we are in a prime spot to attract more business. All we need to do is insure we keep our costs low and our performance high, and our chances for growth are all but certain. And growth, of course, is what all our people want and need, as it brings upgrades, promotions, and job security.
We just need to keep working well below industry average wages and everything will be groovy.

An additional factor is the likely hood of its parent company, SkyWest, being more likely to route new airplanes to its non-union company.
I dig the subtle anti-union propaganda.

John at the helm of his 47’ Island Packet 445
Nothing like a picture of an exec on his half million dollar boat while we're the lowest paid in the industry.

Mesa is unable to attract new pilots or enough new ones and won’t be able to staff the coming E-jets and will thus not be able to meet its contractual obligation to United and will lose the contract and United will simply fly them themselves by offering Mesa e-jet pilots free entry into United to fly them there.
Who wrote this?

...The attributed and follow up rumor to forgoing is that United might decide to simply take back their airplanes (E-Jet) currently operated by Mesa and operate them self by offering Mesa E-Jet pilots "free" entry into United to fly that equipment. Not a bad scenario for me as a pilot I'd say but for Mesa as a company devas-tating. With all due respect! I am sure JO he will have some way of talking himself out of the situation! I am curious to read what it is :-)
Do people even think before asking questions?

American had promised that we would be integrated into their employee web site in the fourth quarter of this year. Now they are saying the middle of next year. American still has not developed much compassion for the employees of their non-wholly owned code share partners. …ST
No no no no, it was October of last year. 2015. That's when we were supposed to get Jetnet. Now it's 2017? Really? Predictable, but it's still a good kick to the balls to hear it confirmed.

Mesa will become insolvent before we ever get access to that website.

Rumor:

The pool of new pilots has dried up.

Answer:

This is simply false. We get anywhere from 125-175 applications a month. We are being selective with the new hires and have processes in place for hiring. …Marcin
...and all the ones like this.

I think we all call BS on that. Our seniority list has actually shrunk marginally. It nearly touched 1300 (or did), now it's gone down from that number as we take on more Ejets and attrition only intensifies.

...it would be a great recruiting tool for Mesa to be able to supply A330 jobs and it is the only venture that our code share partners would not object to.
Yeah, that's just what this industry needs. Mesa widebodies.

Last edited by deltajuliet; 09-17-2016 at 10:18 AM.
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 09-17-2016, 10:13 AM
  #685  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 699
Default

Why would anyone care about not having access to Jetnet?
daOldMan is offline  
Old 09-17-2016, 10:21 AM
  #686  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: CL65
Posts: 955
Default

Originally Posted by daOldMan View Post
Why would anyone care about not having access to Jetnet?
NRTP? Is that what they are talking about? That is pretty useful for booking flights and checking loads.
CLT Guy is offline  
Old 09-17-2016, 10:23 AM
  #687  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 688
Default

Originally Posted by daOldMan View Post
Why would anyone care about not having access to Jetnet?
Let see.

1. Not being able to list oneself.
2. Not being able to check oneself in.
3. Not being able to see an accurate non-rev list.

There's 3 right there.
Sennant is offline  
Old 09-17-2016, 10:32 AM
  #688  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
iFlyRC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,198
Default

Originally Posted by Sennant View Post
Let see.

1. Not being able to list oneself.
2. Not being able to check oneself in.
3. Not being able to see an accurate non-rev list.

There's 3 right there.
I'm not sure if even PDT and PSA have full access to JetNet yet?
iFlyRC is offline  
Old 09-17-2016, 10:38 AM
  #689  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: CL65
Posts: 955
Default

Originally Posted by iFlyRC View Post
I'm not sure if even PDT and PSA have full access to JetNet yet?
NRTP is where we list. I know PSA has full access.

Jetnet is more than just that.

I believe each WO has full access to everything that is required, but on company specific websites. NRTP (Non Rev Travel Planner) is where we are able to check loads and book nonrev tickets.
CLT Guy is offline  
Old 09-17-2016, 12:05 PM
  #690  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
Default

What is virtual basing?
Xdashdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
rabsing76
Mesa Airlines
232
10-20-2017 08:59 AM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
CaribPilot
Regional
14
07-06-2008 06:37 PM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices