More KC-46 problems...
10-01-2020 | 02:47 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,189
Likes: 239
More KC-46 problems...
https://www.defensenews.com/air/2020...stem-problems/
it ought not to be this difficult or expensive to take a mature airframe (767) and modify it to replace 1950s era technology KC-135s.
it ought not to be this difficult or expensive to take a mature airframe (767) and modify it to replace 1950s era technology KC-135s.
10-02-2020 | 06:50 AM
#2
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
https://www.defensenews.com/air/2020...stem-problems/
it ought not to be this difficult or expensive to take a mature airframe (767) and modify it to replace 1950s era technology KC-135s.
it ought not to be this difficult or expensive to take a mature airframe (767) and modify it to replace 1950s era technology KC-135s.
Boeing Defense seems to do better, but obviously they can't build a tanker without BCA.
10-02-2020 | 06:57 AM
#3
Thread Starter
Perennial Reserve
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,189
Likes: 239
But jeez, they’ve been the tanker guys throughout history. Not just the KC-135s but converting C-97s to KC-97s, and even B-29s to KB-50s before that. And in months, not years. And for a damn sight less than $40 billion even in constant year dollars. You’d think the company would die from the embarrassment alone.
10-02-2020 | 07:08 AM
#4
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
But jeez, they’ve been the tanker guys throughout history. Not just the KC-135s but converting C-97s to KC-97s, and even B-29s to KB-50s before that. And in months, not years. And for a damn sight less than $40 billion even in constant year dollars. You’d think the company would die from the embarrassment alone.
New Boeing is MD dba Boeing.
10-02-2020 | 09:56 AM
#5
Living the SloBus life
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 90
“The KC 46 has been an extremely problematical program. I speak with Leanne Caret, the CEO of the defense side of Boeing, on a regular basis about it,” Lord said. “One issue is frankly the technical solution. That was the original design [and] is now being redesigned, but also we have had a myriad of manufacturing issues with [foreign object debris] and other issues.”
However, she said the root cause of the problems is the fixed-price firm contract used for the KC-46 program, which makes Boeing financially responsible for any costs beyond the $4.9 billion ceiling. So far, Boeing has spent more than $4.7 billion in company funds on the KC-46 program — almost equivalent to the Air Force’s own investment in the program.
So basically, the head of acquisitions for DOD sees the KC-46 as a poorly designed solution to the tanker mission. Then turns around and says it’s the AF’s fault for using a fixed-price firm contract, since Boeing couldn’t soak the taxpayers for wildly underbidding the true cost.
This sounds like AF acquisitions didn’t know how to draw up a proper competition that measured what actually matters and Boeing assumed that when it became evident how much they had underestimated costs Congress would bail them out. The ineptitude and corporate laziness is mind boggling. A clean sheet design would have better met the mission needs and would have avoided the contract contortions that trying to buy an American COTS airframe resulted in.
However, she said the root cause of the problems is the fixed-price firm contract used for the KC-46 program, which makes Boeing financially responsible for any costs beyond the $4.9 billion ceiling. So far, Boeing has spent more than $4.7 billion in company funds on the KC-46 program — almost equivalent to the Air Force’s own investment in the program.
So basically, the head of acquisitions for DOD sees the KC-46 as a poorly designed solution to the tanker mission. Then turns around and says it’s the AF’s fault for using a fixed-price firm contract, since Boeing couldn’t soak the taxpayers for wildly underbidding the true cost.
This sounds like AF acquisitions didn’t know how to draw up a proper competition that measured what actually matters and Boeing assumed that when it became evident how much they had underestimated costs Congress would bail them out. The ineptitude and corporate laziness is mind boggling. A clean sheet design would have better met the mission needs and would have avoided the contract contortions that trying to buy an American COTS airframe resulted in.
10-02-2020 | 11:12 AM
#6
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
BCA should know what they're doing by now. They should have know how to bid a FFP contract without losing their arse, and they should have known better than to intentionally bid (if that's what they did) something like this at a loss in hopes of a bailout.
10-03-2020 | 09:18 AM
#7
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Joe
10-03-2020 | 10:16 AM
#8
Moderate Moderator
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Or, just like the new T-7A program: sell below cost, because you expect to make your profit in the long-term support contract.
No different than my new HP printer. Printer was $50.
Their replacement cartridges? $50 for Black, $75 for color....Wait...that means it’s cheaper to buy a new printer AND cartridge...than just a cartridge....
(Fortunately, there are aftermarket ones that work great for $32).
I’d bet Boeing is banking on the long haul for parts and services.
No different than my new HP printer. Printer was $50.
Their replacement cartridges? $50 for Black, $75 for color....Wait...that means it’s cheaper to buy a new printer AND cartridge...than just a cartridge....
(Fortunately, there are aftermarket ones that work great for $32).
I’d bet Boeing is banking on the long haul for parts and services.
10-03-2020 | 10:48 AM
#9
Prime Minister/Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,906
Likes: 691
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
If you just want cheap, the soviet block is where to shop.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
