Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Active Air Force Pilot Question >

Active Air Force Pilot Question

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Active Air Force Pilot Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2011 | 05:02 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chinabug
NCR757,
I'm an "old" USN MIL pilot (about to retire at 20) and my initial commitment was 8yrs after wings... Unless a new program in the USAF has come up, I don't know of any commissioning source that both guarantees flight school with only a 6yr commitment? Best case, an 8yr commitment will buy you 10yrs of MIL service. I'd be leary of the recruiter if your intent is to serve only 6yrs. If not, It's a great adventure with amazing experiences both in and out of the c/p. I considered bailing for the airlines in 2001...glad I didn't on every front.

Walking into the airlines with a 20yr pension makes things (ie - FO pay) much more palatable. Most MIL guys I know that bailed at 10-12 yr point are working 20+ days month doing airlines and reserve to keep their QOL.

USAF bubbas, anything different on your side?

Good luck.
Pretty similar to the USAF, except I believe they went to a 10 year commitment at some point. It may have gone back down to 8 years. A search of threads in the mil section on APC will give you the answer for those who want to know.

The old adage is don't think you're going to fight the next war like the last one was fought. I'd say the same logic could apply to going to the airlines. The reason I say that is because when I was a 2Lt in the AF I saw pilots getting out and going to the airlines in '90 and in the end things appear to have worked out pretty well for them. Flash forward to '99/'00 and the guys who got out didn't fare quite so well. So if you ask guys like me and Chinabug we'll say our experience was that staying in for 20 was well worth it: we have a guaranteed retirement check coming in every month and tricare. Both make the transition to the airlines much easier, and if a furlough comes down the pike we're better prepared to deal with it. However, if payrates go up and the military situation changes (much can happen in 10 to 20 years) then this model may no longer hold true. So take in the info, but realize the only certainty is change. My $0.02.
Reply
Old 04-22-2011 | 05:05 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NCR757dxr
Thanks for all the replies. That website has a lot of what I'm asking already posted by others.

Jesse; I was told that I had my freshman year without any commitment requirements. However I had to commit on the first day of sophomore year and I wouldn't know the status of flying until like my senior year. She went on to say that IF I didn't get a slot, my commitment required 4 years of other active Air Force service. Keep in mind I was paying for college. You've basically vindicated my entire reason for posting this! Not that recruiter is going to lie to you but......
She may have well been straight with you; why push you to not stay in, right? Back when I was in ROTC I didn't sign the line which is dotted until 1 week before graduation. My circumstances were not standard, however. But what did stand out was they told USAF ROTC students what they were going to get before the signed up whereas ARMY ROTC students found out after commissioning what they were getting (Transportation Corps, Armour, Air Cav, Chemical Corps, Infantry, etc.). That made Army a no-go for me.
Reply
Old 04-22-2011 | 07:16 PM
  #13  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default

NCR:

If I read this right, you already have a Bachelor's Degree. If so, ROTC is not an option. Neither is the Academy.

The only option for those pursuing the USAF as an officer, post-college, is OTS. If you want to go Air Guard or Reserve, they have a similar OTS system.

Pilot slots are primary given to the Academy and ROTC; usually, OTS fills the missing spaces (guys who can't pass the medical, change their minds about flying, etc). Sometimes OTS has lots of slots; other times, not so much.

Active-duty flying training commitments are, I believe, universal for the Air Force, Navy, and Marines, at 10 years. I do not know about the Army and helicopters.

For the Guard and Reserves, they can't tie you down as securely to 10 years (since the members are usually part-timers), but they make it so if you try to leave early, you will never get another military flying job....nor a positive recommendation for a civil flying job.

Since you have your heart set on flying a tanker, I would pursue a Guard or Reserve unit that flies them. Keep in mind, saying "I only want to join to fly, nothing else" will not weigh favorably. They are looking for people to support the mission, not an obvious attempt to get some heavy time then bail for something else.

Last thought: when I joined, I wanted to fly 4-engine heavies and do minimum time to go to an airline job. A funny thing happened along the way: I found out I loved yanking and banking and flying upside-down. I felt pride in my uniform and serving my country. I still got an airline job.

And I'm back in the Air Force, yanking and banking, because it is still more fun (and a better-paying job) than the airlines.

Good luck.
Reply
Old 04-23-2011 | 07:06 AM
  #14  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks UAL..... maybe I've talked to you in person in the past.
Reply
Old 04-23-2011 | 07:44 AM
  #15  
ryan1234's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: USAF
Default

Originally Posted by NCR757dxr
That is my point though; my ROTC chances have come and gone for me unless I'm allowed to still do it after college?

Based on what I was told, second hand mind you, is that if I ONLY want to fly KC's and had no desire for the "toys," finding a spot without ROTC wouldn't be that hard. I guess I just want that sort of verified, especially since I wasn't talking to the man directly.

Maybe my B-I-L didn't get the story completely correct.


I've actually looked at those on and off since I decided against ROTC initially. The stories/impressions I got though was there wasn't that much flying to be had anymore. Incorrect?
"Toys"? What!?

The only way you can get any notion of being slightly guaranteed an airframe is to go apply for a Guard/Reserve hiring board. I say slightly, because until you're actually siting in the aircraft, nothing is "guaranteed" and many things can happen in between (i.e. Brac, you, etc). Like UPTme said... you either want to serve or you don't.

ROTC - they have a Master's program at (some) schools... depending on your age, etc.

All of the post ROTC paths (OTS/Guard/Reserve) get extremely competitive as time goes on. It gets so competitive that if a recruiter is trying to talk you into be a pilot... for some reason he/she likes you and wants to help you.
Reply
Old 04-23-2011 | 08:14 AM
  #16  
AZFlyer's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,274
Likes: 0
Default

I took the AFOQT at Arizona State University's ROTC Det. so that I may apply to guard units. The ROTC commander, after seeing my scores, made a brief attempt at getting me to go for my masters so that I could be in ROTC at ASU. I politely said 'thanks, but no thanks', but I guess that shows that ASU is at least one school where you could do ROTC while working on a masters degree. Food for thought.
Reply
Old 04-23-2011 | 08:55 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for all the information. I just want one thing known (due to a previous post made that looks like it was deleted by the mods).

I want to serve but I want to do so in a flying roll. This is not meant as a bash to anyone currently in uniform serving in other branches/rolls.

*** EDIT ***
Looks like it popped up again, see below.
Reply
Old 04-23-2011 | 09:09 AM
  #18  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Default

How has this thread gone on for so long? We have a guy posting that he "ONLY WANTS TO FLY TANKERS LOL" and that he cannot stand the thought of serving through anything other than flying. He is simultaneously insulting every non-rated Officer in the USAF (and come to think of it, also insulting all navigators and ABM's) while giving pilots a bad name. You have the "Officer first, pilot second" mentality so horribly screwed up, but what makes it worse is that people are actually looking past that and giving you ADVICE.
Reply
Old 04-23-2011 | 10:50 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 1
From: 744 CA
Default

Not me... PLEASE do not join the military. If you are not committed to being a military officer FIRST.. and then a pilot... even if you get there you are not going to be very happy. Even in Guard units but certainly in AD units you are going to have additional duties.. and in 10 years post "winging" probably going to get popped for a non-flying tour. That and the fact that many of todays UPT grads are getting UAV's....

My brother was AD Navy Pilot for 20 years... in that time he had 3 non flying tours... and one of those was before he hit 10 years... so dont think it cant happen. I did nearly 8 on active duty ( less commitment back then ) and did a wing staff job during that time that curtailed my flying for a year.....its not all about being in the cockpit.
If your ONLY reason for flying is to fly and then move on to "greener" pastures..please go another route.
Reply
Old 04-23-2011 | 12:16 PM
  #20  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,436
Likes: 438
Default

As far as AD,listen to what Herc says! If you just want to fly, then join the Guard! Become a part-timer and enjoy "just being a pilot," for the military...it's a great gig. Your additional duty will be your civilian job!

Originally Posted by d3c0y
We have a guy posting that he "ONLY WANTS TO FLY TANKERS LOL" and that he cannot stand the thought of serving through anything other than flying.
Do you have something against Tankers? Seems like a good gig! This is a pilot forum...most of the pilots that I knew, just wanted to fly for the Air Force.

Originally Posted by d3c0y
He is simultaneously insulting every non-rated Officer in the USAF (and come to think of it, also insulting all navigators and ABM's) while giving pilots a bad name.
Who cares...

I have nothing for people who get offended by such trivial things! Really you're insulted because a guy says he wants to only be a pilot. He didn't say that you suck because you're a mx officer, that was just your chosen path. I have great respect for all jobs in the military, except ammo...they suck! . But, if you have some underlying sense of inadequacy because you're not a pilot, that's your problem! (not necessarily directed at you d3c0y...just shoe clerks that have it out for pilots)

note: ammo joke is from my enlisted day...don't get your panties in a wad!

Originally Posted by d3c0y
You have the "Officer first, pilot second" mentality so horribly screwed up, but what makes it worse is that people are actually looking past that and giving you ADVICE.
As do most of us when we joined the military to be pilots. I know, all I wanted to do is fly...still feel the same way. But as with most of us, we figure it out and change our thinking. But as a punk, it's his job to fly his a$$ off, learn, and be the best pilot he can. All the other stuff will fall into place later in his career.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flameout
Military
32
03-05-2010 12:21 PM
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
Lbell911
Major
29
07-31-2007 05:02 PM
flystraightin
Major
4
05-31-2006 06:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices