Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Military Retirement in the News Again >

Military Retirement in the News Again

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Military Retirement in the News Again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2011, 02:06 AM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,317
Default

There might be a benefit. Since nobody would put with the kind of BS we deal with now, QOL would have to get a lot better.

Also they would have to pay huge retention bonuses most of the time in order to manage to force to get their control grade numbers where they need them. This would mean the cost of war and the military would be more apparent in today's budget rather than getting kicked down the road a few decades.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 02:59 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Marvin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: B-737 Right
Posts: 243
Default

Kinda funny how, if you start talking about reforming welfare or Social Security there is an overwhelming backlash, but you can have a discussion about ... not "reforming", but REDUCING, military retirement benefits for service members who are already at, for example, 15-18 years ... and there would seem to be no public outcry.

In fact, you'll have a hard time even finding a report about it in the mainstream media.

I am already retired (2008), but if I were currently active and retirement eligible I think I would strongly consider dropping my papers IMMEDIATELY. It takes 6 months or so to get a retirement approved, and by then it could be too late.

Of course, there is a chance that cooler heads will prevail -- the report showed an option that would still keep the retirement plan solvent and would retain the currrent retirement system for current service members. I would think that at least some folks would get grandfathered into the old plan ...
Marvin is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 04:50 AM
  #13  
Super Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,563
Default

Originally Posted by Faixa Azul View Post
Maybe that's the goal. These people are a lot of things, but they aren't stupid. Maybe they're hoping we get a mass push the Guard/Reserve, reduce our standing forces by an order of magnitude, and then have a large reserve force they can mobilize when they see fit without the long-term costs of an active retirement.
No...they're just plain stupid! The Guard/Reserve manning isn't exactly being increased...we can only get so big. Now if we see an increase in the ARC manning, then I may buy into your conspiracy theory.
crewdawg is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 07:08 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,195
Default

Originally Posted by Marvin View Post
Kinda funny how, if you start talking about reforming welfare or Social Security there is an overwhelming backlash, but you can have a discussion about ... not "reforming", but REDUCING, military retirement benefits for service members who are already at, for example, 15-18 years ... and there would seem to be no public outcry.
The other thing no one will talk about is the math. The DOD budget is roughly $500B/year. Currently the Gov't spend about $300B/month and only brings in about $172B/month. So we're talking a monthly deficit of $128B/month. So if you completely abolished the military... you'd still have 8 months, or roughly a $1.1 trillion annual deficit.

Sorry, but Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid is were it's at. There is just no way around it, no politician will risk their career to tackle it though, thus nothing will change except to hurt those that have sacrificed the most.
Grumble is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 11:40 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hrkdrivr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Fairly local
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by Marvin View Post
Kinda funny how, if you start talking about reforming welfare or Social Security there is an overwhelming backlash, but you can have a discussion about ... not "reforming", but REDUCING, military retirement benefits for service members who are already at, for example, 15-18 years ... and there would seem to be no public outcry.
The military folks are an easy target. They're a small population being looked at by a huge population...low-hanging fruit not many people will care about, until the military is broken...
Hrkdrivr is offline  
Old 07-29-2011, 10:08 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 111
Default

They'll just do what they've done in the past when the airlines started hiring big and they couldn't afford to have pilots leave--STOPLOSS! No need for bonuses or improved QOL, you serve "at the will of the President" until they get their numbers right.....
decrabbitz is offline  
Old 07-29-2011, 10:42 AM
  #17  
Super Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,563
Default

Originally Posted by decrabbitz View Post
They'll just do what they've done in the past when the airlines started hiring big and they couldn't afford to have pilots leave--STOPLOSS! No need for bonuses or improved QOL, you serve "at the will of the President" until they get their numbers right.....
At which point, you have a warm body that punches the clock every day, and not much more. No more, 12 hour days and working the weekend. Do their 8-10 hours day with a nice lunch break, and an hour in the gym.
crewdawg is offline  
Old 07-30-2011, 10:07 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 291
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg View Post
Do their 8-10 hours day with a nice lunch break, and an hour in the gym.
What'd be the point of a stoploss if everyone has to work in Finance?
BFMthisA10 is offline  
Old 07-30-2011, 10:12 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,195
Default

Originally Posted by BFMthisA10 View Post
What'd be the point of a stoploss if everyone has to work in Finance?
Now that's funny.
Grumble is offline  
Old 07-30-2011, 11:20 AM
  #20  
Super Moderator
 
crewdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,563
Default

Originally Posted by BFMthisA10 View Post
What'd be the point of a stoploss if everyone has to work in Finance?
Now that's hilarious and sad at the same time... Well played BFM!!!
crewdawg is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djrogs03
Military
35
12-01-2009 11:37 AM
FlywithStyle
Regional
40
06-28-2009 12:20 PM
elfouquer
Regional
10
06-13-2009 02:06 PM
9999
Money Talk
11
12-10-2006 05:09 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices