Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Pilots Palace Chase??? >

Pilots Palace Chase???

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Pilots Palace Chase???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2012 | 12:23 PM
  #31  
ugleeual's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 47
From: 767/757 CA
Default

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
True, that sucks. It also sucked building my own tent in BF middle E after 9/11.

Those guys weren't expecting what they got, and neither were my buds and I. But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.

Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.

But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.

This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
Ditto... well said.
Reply
Old 01-21-2012 | 07:34 PM
  #32  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bengalsfan
Anyone know how strict they hold you to the 4-yr commitment for transferring post 9/11 education benefits? I may have a great opportunity with a reserve unit, but have 2 years remaining on said post 9/11 commitment. I'm complete with my UPT commitment fwiw.

Thanks
I have been looking into this as well. Have a great opportunity with an ANG unit but I'm tied down by my transfer ADSC. Turns out you definitely CAN transfer your additional commitment to the ANG or AFRC. But, and this is the tough part, you do it through Palace Chase. I currently have another 2.5 years on my transfer ADSC and will have to get Palace Chase approval. Pretty sure my 11F functional with non-concur so hoping it gets approved at the SAF level. If it's approved, the commitment simply transfers over to AFRC or ANG. Simple process. Tough part is getting big blue to let you go if you're an 11F or other undermanned career field...
Reply
Old 01-21-2012 | 07:48 PM
  #33  
Deuce130's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
From: 777 FO
Default

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
True, that sucks. It also sucked building my own tent in BF middle E after 9/11.

Those guys weren't expecting what they got, and neither were my buds and I. But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.

Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.

But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.

This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
Whatever. I built my own tent, too, then flew a 9 hour sortie in afghanistan that night. It was a minor inconvenience and par for the course in November 2001. Comparing that to having your life long dream crushed overnight is a stretch. I'm thinking if you got non vol'd to UAS you'd be singing a different tune. Btw, what exactly were you expecting that you didn't get? You make it sound like you expected a squad of E-4s to build your freaking tent for you. Talk about a sense of entitlement.
Reply
Old 01-22-2012 | 08:22 AM
  #34  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,436
Likes: 438
Default

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
It also sucked building my own tent in BF middle E after 9/11.
OMG!!!! You had to build your own tent! Dude...that does suck, glad you made it out ok.

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.
There were a few that did SIE! Do I agree with that? No…but it was their right. I'm not going to look down on them for not wanting spend the next 10 years, not flying...which in all reality is what most of us signed up to do. I'm sure they were either let go or got some crappy deal, but at least they can get out in a few years, vice 10 years! When I was leaving IFF they were tossing around the idea of moving the assignment night to after graduation to keep this from happening (even the leadership knew this was a crappy deal)...I’m guessing that never happened. Probably, because these "entitled" kids actually moved on and did their duty. I never said they didn't shut up and color...still doesn't mean that the situation doesn't suck for them. But good job jumping on the entitlement bandwagon so quick.

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.
But here is the real question....we're you actually flying? Some of these guys will, most likely, never get to fly (for the AF anyway). I have heard some have recently escaped but in very small numbers. But imagine how you'd feel if you were told that you would be operating UAVs for the next 10 years of your life!

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.
A few in our government think that those benefits may not be an entitlement anymore. Let's take away that free health care for all those who are retired and see if any sense of entitlement pops out of our older generations...

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
Yes, you're right...no one from the previous generations has ever complained about anything. Where is that "Dear Boss" letter...
Reply
Old 01-22-2012 | 10:03 AM
  #35  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 694
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
True, that sucks. It also sucked building my own tent in BF middle E after 9/11.

Those guys weren't expecting what they got, and neither were my buds and I. But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.

Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.

But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.

This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt on the bait-and-switch UAV drop with a ten-year commitment. Nobody signed up for ten years to fly UAV's...they should have had the obligation reduced to 4-5. That was a bone job.
Reply
Old 01-24-2012 | 05:11 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by OccupyRestSeat
But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself.
I think that sums it up--there are no guarantees after signing the pilot training paperwork--and the AF has never claimed otherwise.

I agree with rick that a shorter ADSC or MWS follow-on for the guys who got blindsided into the UAV would have been a more equitable solution. It was surely workable if the AF wanted to do the right thing by those guys.
Reply
Old 01-24-2012 | 05:51 PM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by Deuce130
You make it sound like you expected a squad of E-4s to build your freaking tent for you. Talk about a sense of entitlement.
...and how did you perform on that 9-hour sortie?

I don't know about you, but my job was to show up mentally and physically prepared to fly so I could provide the best possible support for the guys on the ground taking fire or running the convoy.

Saddling us with ancillary tasks such as building a place to sleep prior to flying was a ridiculously mismanaged leadership snafu. There are guys trained and paid to set up a base in a fraction of the time it takes us to do it. That's why they're here--they are "support" troops. Just like I am trained to support the ground troops, there are guys trained to support me.

Thanks for the war story, but I rolled into the sack 4 hours before my 8 hour sortie on night 1 of OEF on 7 Oct. I consider it a complete leadership failure.

Short answer, yes, I did expect a "squad of E-4s to build my freaking tent for me." Or O-6s. I don't care. The AF ****ed up.
Reply
Old 01-24-2012 | 07:10 PM
  #38  
Deuce130's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
From: 777 FO
Default

Originally Posted by More Bacon
...and how did you perform on that 9-hour sortie?

I don't know about you, but my job was to show up mentally and physically prepared to fly so I could provide the best possible support for the guys on the ground taking fire or running the convoy.

Saddling us with ancillary tasks such as building a place to sleep prior to flying was a ridiculously mismanaged leadership snafu. There are guys trained and paid to set up a base in a fraction of the time it takes us to do it. That's why they're here--they are "support" troops. Just like I am trained to support the ground troops, there are guys trained to support me.

Thanks for the war story, but I rolled into the sack 4 hours before my 8 hour sortie on night 1 of OEF on 7 Oct. I consider it a complete leadership failure.

Short answer, yes, I did expect a "squad of E-4s to build my freaking tent for me." Or O-6s. I don't care. The AF ****ed up.
Then you expected too much. Sorry the war wasn't more like Red Flag for you.
Reply
Old 01-25-2012 | 03:43 AM
  #39  
LowSlowT2's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Deuce130
Then you expected too much. Sorry the war wasn't more like Red Flag for you.
Spoken like a tac airlifter! Love it!
Reply
Old 01-25-2012 | 01:18 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by Deuce130
Then you expected too much. Sorry the war wasn't more like Red Flag for you.
Sorry your track select didn't work out for you.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Rocket Man
Major
57
11-06-2009 09:12 PM
Whacker77
Major
70
10-16-2009 06:54 PM
Flatspin
Regional
43
02-16-2009 07:45 PM
nw320driver
Major
15
11-17-2006 07:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices