Pilots Palace Chase???
#31
True, that sucks. It also sucked building my own tent in BF middle E after 9/11.
Those guys weren't expecting what they got, and neither were my buds and I. But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.
Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.
But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.
This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
Those guys weren't expecting what they got, and neither were my buds and I. But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.
Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.
But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.
This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
#32
New Hire
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
I have been looking into this as well. Have a great opportunity with an ANG unit but I'm tied down by my transfer ADSC. Turns out you definitely CAN transfer your additional commitment to the ANG or AFRC. But, and this is the tough part, you do it through Palace Chase. I currently have another 2.5 years on my transfer ADSC and will have to get Palace Chase approval. Pretty sure my 11F functional with non-concur so hoping it gets approved at the SAF level. If it's approved, the commitment simply transfers over to AFRC or ANG. Simple process. Tough part is getting big blue to let you go if you're an 11F or other undermanned career field...
#33
True, that sucks. It also sucked building my own tent in BF middle E after 9/11.
Those guys weren't expecting what they got, and neither were my buds and I. But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.
Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.
But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.
This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
Those guys weren't expecting what they got, and neither were my buds and I. But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.
Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.
But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.
This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
#34
OMG!!!! You had to build your own tent! Dude...that does suck, glad you made it out ok.
There were a few that did SIE! Do I agree with that? No…but it was their right. I'm not going to look down on them for not wanting spend the next 10 years, not flying...which in all reality is what most of us signed up to do. I'm sure they were either let go or got some crappy deal, but at least they can get out in a few years, vice 10 years! When I was leaving IFF they were tossing around the idea of moving the assignment night to after graduation to keep this from happening (even the leadership knew this was a crappy deal)...I’m guessing that never happened. Probably, because these "entitled" kids actually moved on and did their duty. I never said they didn't shut up and color...still doesn't mean that the situation doesn't suck for them. But good job jumping on the entitlement bandwagon so quick.
But here is the real question....we're you actually flying? Some of these guys will, most likely, never get to fly (for the AF anyway). I have heard some have recently escaped but in very small numbers. But imagine how you'd feel if you were told that you would be operating UAVs for the next 10 years of your life!
A few in our government think that those benefits may not be an entitlement anymore. Let's take away that free health care for all those who are retired and see if any sense of entitlement pops out of our older generations...
Yes, you're right...no one from the previous generations has ever complained about anything. Where is that "Dear Boss" letter...
Yes, you're right...no one from the previous generations has ever complained about anything. Where is that "Dear Boss" letter...
#35
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,908
Likes: 694
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
True, that sucks. It also sucked building my own tent in BF middle E after 9/11.
Those guys weren't expecting what they got, and neither were my buds and I. But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.
Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.
But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.
This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
Those guys weren't expecting what they got, and neither were my buds and I. But I signed on the dotted line, and I honored my commitment--which, by the way, was to serve my country, and not myself. If those UAV-assigned guys were that averse, they could have SIE'd and taken their chances. Apparently they decided not to do that.
Sure, it sucked. Leadership generally sucked, especially on the O-5/6 and above level. Deployments sucked, my airframe sucked, pretty much everything other than my buds sucked.
But I signed on the dotted line, and I was not entitled to anything more from the AF than my paycheck and associated benefits.
This ridiculous sense of entitlement must be a generational thing. Enough already.
#36
Banned
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
I agree with rick that a shorter ADSC or MWS follow-on for the guys who got blindsided into the UAV would have been a more equitable solution. It was surely workable if the AF wanted to do the right thing by those guys.
#37
Banned
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
I don't know about you, but my job was to show up mentally and physically prepared to fly so I could provide the best possible support for the guys on the ground taking fire or running the convoy.
Saddling us with ancillary tasks such as building a place to sleep prior to flying was a ridiculously mismanaged leadership snafu. There are guys trained and paid to set up a base in a fraction of the time it takes us to do it. That's why they're here--they are "support" troops. Just like I am trained to support the ground troops, there are guys trained to support me.
Thanks for the war story, but I rolled into the sack 4 hours before my 8 hour sortie on night 1 of OEF on 7 Oct. I consider it a complete leadership failure.
Short answer, yes, I did expect a "squad of E-4s to build my freaking tent for me." Or O-6s. I don't care. The AF ****ed up.
#38
...and how did you perform on that 9-hour sortie?
I don't know about you, but my job was to show up mentally and physically prepared to fly so I could provide the best possible support for the guys on the ground taking fire or running the convoy.
Saddling us with ancillary tasks such as building a place to sleep prior to flying was a ridiculously mismanaged leadership snafu. There are guys trained and paid to set up a base in a fraction of the time it takes us to do it. That's why they're here--they are "support" troops. Just like I am trained to support the ground troops, there are guys trained to support me.
Thanks for the war story, but I rolled into the sack 4 hours before my 8 hour sortie on night 1 of OEF on 7 Oct. I consider it a complete leadership failure.
Short answer, yes, I did expect a "squad of E-4s to build my freaking tent for me." Or O-6s. I don't care. The AF ****ed up.
I don't know about you, but my job was to show up mentally and physically prepared to fly so I could provide the best possible support for the guys on the ground taking fire or running the convoy.
Saddling us with ancillary tasks such as building a place to sleep prior to flying was a ridiculously mismanaged leadership snafu. There are guys trained and paid to set up a base in a fraction of the time it takes us to do it. That's why they're here--they are "support" troops. Just like I am trained to support the ground troops, there are guys trained to support me.
Thanks for the war story, but I rolled into the sack 4 hours before my 8 hour sortie on night 1 of OEF on 7 Oct. I consider it a complete leadership failure.
Short answer, yes, I did expect a "squad of E-4s to build my freaking tent for me." Or O-6s. I don't care. The AF ****ed up.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post


Spoken like a tac airlifter!
Love it!

