more sequester posturing?
#31
Banned
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: 36N15
1. Lots of fuel dollars remaining in a VC-131H squadron. How did they get spent? Fly the plane out over the Atlantic, dump the fuel, come back and log the hours.
2. $100K left in the King Air account with 30 days left in the FY. Fighter squadron next door out of fuel with 6 weeks remaining. When I asked if we could transfer that fuel money to them the answer: "No, can't be done because they're funded out of a different pot of money."
That resulted in a month of "instrument trainers" from SoCal to ACV for a can of soda and return (no fuel dump system on a King Air!).
Upside: Logged a boatload of multi-engine TPIC for my airline job! Thank you Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer.
And the Pentagon INSISTS we can't cut their budget. HA!
#32
MG Wells told our base yesterday that the cuts are coming and the AF plans on shutting down squadrons (no flying) starting in May for a month or two at a time. BL: we need to shave off $12 billion from our budget He said if you are not deploying or spinning up to deploy (funny, thats all I do) then you won't get any flying hours. He said the AF's focus is on the F-35. This is right after he "gave out" two Bronze Stars. One was to a MSgt finance person who "saved the AF millions while deployed" and another to a contracting Officer who went above and beyond by "going outside the wire". I guess we are now officially in the military where everyone get a trophy. Then he went on to talk about sexual harassment.
#33
Amen. Two true stories from a past life:
1. Lots of fuel dollars remaining in a VC-131H squadron. How did they get spent? Fly the plane out over the Atlantic, dump the fuel, come back and log the hours.
2. $100K left in the King Air account with 30 days left in the FY. Fighter squadron next door out of fuel with 6 weeks remaining. When I asked if we could transfer that fuel money to them the answer: "No, can't be done because they're funded out of a different pot of money."
That resulted in a month of "instrument trainers" from SoCal to ACV for a can of soda and return (no fuel dump system on a King Air!).
Upside: Logged a boatload of multi-engine TPIC for my airline job! Thank you Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer.
And the Pentagon INSISTS we can't cut their budget. HA!
1. Lots of fuel dollars remaining in a VC-131H squadron. How did they get spent? Fly the plane out over the Atlantic, dump the fuel, come back and log the hours.
2. $100K left in the King Air account with 30 days left in the FY. Fighter squadron next door out of fuel with 6 weeks remaining. When I asked if we could transfer that fuel money to them the answer: "No, can't be done because they're funded out of a different pot of money."
That resulted in a month of "instrument trainers" from SoCal to ACV for a can of soda and return (no fuel dump system on a King Air!).
Upside: Logged a boatload of multi-engine TPIC for my airline job! Thank you Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer.
And the Pentagon INSISTS we can't cut their budget. HA!
#34
New Hire
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
#35
How so early? Did you get some hours yanked? Too many dudes/not enough hours for everyone to make RAP? Did they not plan out the FHP to cover the year or are the boses unwilling to say no?
#36
We handed back quite a few hours last year. We still got the same amount this year.
Got to love the self licking ice cream cones.

Fitness monitors are very important. See, we like to preach Integrity First, but we don't really believe in it...
With the budget cuts we are facing, why don't we just shed the whole AFRC? Move the iron/people, fold the jobs into the ANG or AD and cut the redundant positions. Do we really need to have a HQ staff for both? It seems like we could cut quite a few people, with a relatively low strain on the deployment cycle, and save a significant amount of money.
Got to love the self licking ice cream cones.

Fitness monitors are very important. See, we like to preach Integrity First, but we don't really believe in it...

With the budget cuts we are facing, why don't we just shed the whole AFRC? Move the iron/people, fold the jobs into the ANG or AD and cut the redundant positions. Do we really need to have a HQ staff for both? It seems like we could cut quite a few people, with a relatively low strain on the deployment cycle, and save a significant amount of money.
#37
MG Wells told our base yesterday that the cuts are coming and the AF plans on shutting down squadrons (no flying) starting in May for a month or two at a time. BL: we need to shave off $12 billion from our budget He said if you are not deploying or spinning up to deploy (funny, thats all I do) then you won't get any flying hours. He said the AF's focus is on the F-35. This is right after he "gave out" two Bronze Stars. One was to a MSgt finance person who "saved the AF millions while deployed" and another to a contracting Officer who went above and beyond by "going outside the wire". I guess we are now officially in the military where everyone get a trophy. Then he went on to talk about sexual harassment.
#38
Let's take a quick look at the Viper community. There are two stand alone Viper wings in the AFRC. Neither sits alert, in fact Homestead has a Guard unit that has an alert det on their base... Ft Worth has the Tulsa Guard sitting alert in their back yard. I could be wrong, but as far I can tell the last time FT Worth deployed was 2007. We're going on our 3rd deployment since that time (would be 4th but we were pulled out to do an ORI). At a minimum, they could consolidate their jets into one wing, with two squadrons, and get rid of a lot of redundant positions. This isn't meant to bash these units...I just think they could easily be folded in the ANG, and that move could save some $$$.
Since we've talked about the HQ, self licking ice cream cone. With two ARC components with such close mission sets, to provide a ready force to deploy when needed, at a much cheaper cost. Do we really need two separate compenents? Do we really need an ANG A staff and a AFRC A staff? So instead of having one group of people running around justifying their existence, we have two... Think of how much we could save in just getting rid of redundancies in the two components.
I'm not a hater of the reserve, I have lots of bros in various reserve positions, and feel that the ANG/Res bring a wealth of skill/knowledge that is irreplaceable. I'm just looking at the budget concerns and thinking of ways to free up cash. Being that the ANG is a bigger (and I believe tougher to get rid of), we could fold AFRC into the Gaurd and save some serious cash. Sure we can sit and have measuring contest, but at the end of the day, we're flat broke. If we don't fix it some way, we are totally screwed.
2. $100K left in the King Air account with 30 days left in the FY. Fighter squadron next door out of fuel with 6 weeks remaining. When I asked if we could transfer that fuel money to them the answer: "No, can't be done because they're funded out of a different pot of money."
A squadron mate thought he was helping the AF out by finding a better deal on a hotel. He saved the AF 150 bucks. But since he went through a third party website, finance would not pay it. What mind of sense does that make? He tried to save the AF money and they say F you!
#39
The shoe clerks can fight the next war.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post


Well can you send those extra hours to ACC? We're forecasting to me finished with our FHP in Jun. 

