Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
GFAFB/CC Ousted for being fat >

GFAFB/CC Ousted for being fat

Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

GFAFB/CC Ousted for being fat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2013, 09:30 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: ERJ CA
Posts: 1,082
Default

The AF is only interested in pursuing the model of "health" exemplified by Gen Schwartz and Gen McPeak before him--i.e., the anorexic twig who can't even lift their own weight, much less that of a wounded comrade.
Blackwing is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 04:19 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Retired
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank View Post
Hopefully the first of many commanders to get canned for failing F2F. The double standard is a morale killer.

Regarding Col Bush's bio--only 2100 flight hours in 25 years? That's even more embarrassing than getting fired.
You are right. For the commander of a heavy unit to only have 2100 hours in 25 years is pretty sad. But, I guess the only way to get that command position is to get out of the cockpit and do the staff/headquarters thing. I had a few commanders that had very little flying time; I never really respected them or trusted them when it came to operational things. If you haven't "been there done that" how can you expect to lead the troops and have them follow you?
Flyinhigh is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 06:02 AM
  #43  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by Flyinhigh View Post
You are right. For the commander of a heavy unit to only have 2100 hours in 25 years is pretty sad. But, I guess the only way to get that command position is to get out of the cockpit and do the staff/headquarters thing. I had a few commanders that had very little flying time; I never really respected them or trusted them when it came to operational things. If you haven't "been there done that" how can you expect to lead the troops and have them follow you?
Wow. He's barely qualified to be my FO.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 06:45 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by Blackwing View Post
The AF is only interested in pursuing the model of "health" exemplified by Gen Schwartz and Gen McPeak before him--i.e., the anorexic twig who can't even lift their own weight, much less that of a wounded comrade.
My experience in the army was that the guys that just seemed moderately strong and were fairly skinny were the ones that could haul the most gear over distances. Ruck, m60, etc. I think most of the armed forces are trying to go for rounded performance, but they have different ways of trying to get there. It was almost never some 225lb muscle bound 5'11" guy that was killing the obstacle course, carrying the gear, etc. The special forces guys I knew were tough as nails, but so much of it was mental. The AF should have some systems like the MC or Army for determining this BF thing, but you have to be careful it doesn't promote more unfit airmen, which really just depends on the exact program specifics.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 08:18 AM
  #45  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
The special forces guys I knew were tough as nails, but so much of it was mental.
Not all mental. SOF operators maintain a high level of cardio and strength performance by working both very hard. They are typically stronger pound-for-pound than a gym-rat who focuses on muscle mass, but slower than a pure-endurance athlete who doesn't carry any extra weight. It's a constant tug-of-war between strength and cardio, slack off on one and you'll know it fast. You must have a natural endurance ability as a basis for that sort of regimen..anybody can build strength with diet and weights.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-26-2013, 09:15 PM
  #46  
Get me outta here...
 
HuggyU2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Boeing right seat
Posts: 1,541
Default

Originally Posted by Flyinhigh View Post
I never really respected them or trusted them when it came to operational things. If you haven't "been there done that" how can you expect to lead the troops and have them follow you?
I think you and rickair (not qualified to be your F/O? Are you serious?) have lost your perspective in some cases. Yes, you have more flying time than they do. But do you think that, in 2100 hours, he hasn't "been there, done that"? Maybe not as much of you, but I doubt that it should take 4200 hours to "get your respect".

If it turns out that they are bad pilots, then so be it. But don't write the commander off because you don't think they logged enough time. It's quality, not quantity.

Now, how do you think they are able to talk intelligently about the GIFMAP for your MWS, BOG dwell issues, CDC's, maintenance issues, 7-level upgrades, the myriad of issues that the local congressman wants to hear about (and at a level well above what the average line pilot knows), budget concerns, etc...? As a guy who spent his entire career flying, I'm impressed when they can do all of that. I'm not at their level on all of those issues. But I don't need to be: I'm not the Commander.

Another thing. I've flown with many of these type of officers/pilots over the years. Most were fantastic. A few weren't. However, it had nothing to do with whether they had fewer hours or not. In fact, some of the "low time" pilots I know are better than most of us.
The good ones knew their limits, and relied on their A-team pilots when they needed them. Their knowledge of the mission was solid, however they knew their job was elsewhere, and not stealing the prime missions from the junior guys.

Bottom line: if you don't have respect for them, I doubt that much would change even if they had 8000 hours of flight time.
HuggyU2 is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 04:05 AM
  #47  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by HuggyU2 View Post

I think you and rickair (not qualified to be your F/O? Are you serious?) have lost your perspective in some cases.
That's not what I said. I said "Barely qualified to be my FO" which is exactly true come Aug 1st based on his aeronautical experience. That was congress and the FAA's judgement, not mine.

I'm not saying he's a bad guy, he seems well-liked and certainly dealt with this adversity in a stand-up manner. But even I know enough about the AF to wonder what he's been doing his whole career that his time is that low...that would be a reasonable total for a pointy-nose guy. Separate issue from the waist size thing.

In the Navy nobody gets to be an O6, and most especially operational command, without doing their "MOS" job, and a lot of it.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 05:47 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,982
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Not all mental. SOF operators maintain a high level of cardio and strength performance by working both very hard. They are typically stronger pound-for-pound than a gym-rat who focuses on muscle mass, but slower than a pure-endurance athlete who doesn't carry any extra weight. It's a constant tug-of-war between strength and cardio, slack off on one and you'll know it fast. You must have a natural endurance ability as a basis for that sort of regimen..anybody can build strength with diet and weights.
That's what I mean. They aren't "muscle-bound" like hollywood depicts, their physical appearance might even shock some that think they know but have never interacted. But with a good balance between the two, the rest is the mental toughness and conditioning. Even in a gym you can choose to be balanced in your fitness, it's just that many choose not to.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 05:53 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

Huggy,

I agree with what you wrote. But I have to say, 2100 hours for a heavy guy is remarkably low. Doesn't mean anything about his command ability (or probably his flying ability), but it is an interesting number.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 03-27-2013, 06:01 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: 75/76, C-5
Posts: 322
Default

Wasn't he a non-flyer prior to going to UPT? People always don't enter the Air Force initially to fly. Also, I know fighter guys with less than 2100 hours and I can assure you they are more than qualified to be anyone's FO.
MongoC5 is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Pilot Health
155
09-03-2018 12:36 PM
Piedmonster
Regional
8
08-07-2012 09:07 AM
jackace
SkyWest
66
03-21-2012 04:15 PM
vagabond
Pilot Health
15
09-30-2010 05:31 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-14-2005 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices