![]() |
Originally Posted by MinRest
(Post 3316760)
Don't get mad because I gave my opinion. If you don't like how forums work, don't log in. Everyone said the airline industry was too big to fail, and that has proven true. That is better job security than betting on NJA still being around when Uncle Warren kicks the bucket.
Oh and you are flying for a company that furloughed the highest percentage of pilots out of ALL the airlines in 2009. Are you seriously using FAs being assaulted as a defense of staying at NJA? Are you mental? 100% of pilots working for airlines don't have to see TEB 6 times a month. Enjoy the Hanoi Hilton! Funny thing is absolutely no one asked your opinion. You found another “girl”. Presently we have pilots leaving AA wholly owned and other regional carriers for Netjets. The AA wholly owned new hires are giving up the Airbus seat for a bizjet. Turns out commuting isn’t conducive to a solid family life, and that holds true for any airline, not just a regional. Plain and simple, if you want to live in Billings, Albany, Providence, etc and fly for a 121 carrier, you will go to and from work on your own time and expense. If you want to fly professionally and not deal with non-reving, jumpseating and a two day off block between trips, you come to Netjets. There are plenty of times I’ve gotten on a 737 going to/from a trip and thought “I miss getting in the airplane and turning left”. Then I remember how much of my life I wasted commuting in the day before a trip, buying my own hotel, staying in a crash pad, busting my hump to make a 15 minute turn off my last flight to catch my last commute chance and said to myself, “nah. Cleaning the lav is way better than dealing with that sh—“. Same when I see my W-2 and think “I’d have made $70K more at <insert airline here>”. Then it’s “I spent $70k this year to spend extra time I would have used commuting with my teenaged kid, on my boat, fiddling with cars or just generally sitting on my rear end not stressing about how I’m going to get to work when all the flights on Monday are oversold, the weather sucks and there are three other guys already listed for the jumpseat”. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by frmrdashtrash
(Post 3316844)
Funny thing is absolutely no one asked your opinion. You found another “girl”.
Presently we have pilots leaving AA wholly owned and other regional carriers for Netjets. The AA wholly owned new hires are giving up the Airbus seat for a bizjet. Turns out commuting isn’t conducive to a solid family life, and that holds true for any airline, not just a regional. Plain and simple, if you want to live in Billings, Albany, Providence, etc and fly for a 121 carrier, you will go to and from work on your own time and expense. If you want to fly professionally and not deal with non-reving, jumpseating and a two day off block between trips, you come to Netjets. There are plenty of times I’ve gotten on a 737 going to/from a trip and thought “I miss getting in the airplane and turning left”. Then I remember how much of my life I wasted commuting in the day before a trip, buying my own hotel, staying in a crash pad, busting my hump to make a 15 minute turn off my last flight to catch my last commute chance and said to myself, “nah. Cleaning the lav is way better than dealing with that sh—“. Same when I see my W-2 and think “I’d have made $70K more at <insert airline here>”. Then it’s “I spent $70k this year to spend extra time I would have used commuting with my teenaged kid, on my boat, fiddling with cars or just generally sitting on my rear end not stressing about how I’m going to get to work when all the flights on Monday are oversold, the weather sucks and there are three other guys already listed for the jumpseat”. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by frmrdashtrash
(Post 3316844)
Funny thing is absolutely no one asked your opinion. You found another “girl”.
Presently we have pilots leaving AA wholly owned and other regional carriers for Netjets. The AA wholly owned new hires are giving up the Airbus seat for a bizjet. Turns out commuting isn’t conducive to a solid family life, and that holds true for any airline, not just a regional. Plain and simple, if you want to live in Billings, Albany, Providence, etc and fly for a 121 carrier, you will go to and from work on your own time and expense. If you want to fly professionally and not deal with non-reving, jumpseating and a two day off block between trips, you come to Netjets. There are plenty of times I’ve gotten on a 737 going to/from a trip and thought “I miss getting in the airplane and turning left”. Then I remember how much of my life I wasted commuting in the day before a trip, buying my own hotel, staying in a crash pad, busting my hump to make a 15 minute turn off my last flight to catch my last commute chance and said to myself, “nah. Cleaning the lav is way better than dealing with that sh—“. Same when I see my W-2 and think “I’d have made $70K more at <insert airline here>”. Then it’s “I spent $70k this year to spend extra time I would have used commuting with my teenaged kid, on my boat, fiddling with cars or just generally sitting on my rear end not stressing about how I’m going to get to work when all the flights on Monday are oversold, the weather sucks and there are three other guys already listed for the jumpseat”. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk And no lav cleaning either. Don't get me wrong, NetJets is a fine 135. And it works for a lot of people. But there are other non-commuting options out there, including 121. |
[QUOTE=Blueridger;3316530]For a guy with no regrets, it’s hilarious how you keep stalking the Netjets threads. Kinda like an ex girlfriend you just can’t let go of.
Anyhow, Glad it all worked out for you but some pilots remain aware that without government intervention (ie bailouts, which are still being payed out), the 121 world would have faced mass layoffs. Netjets is now in shape to better absorb an economic downturn like it did in 2020 than any airline. Latest airline data shows terrible 3rd quarter financial results without the government aid. I prefer to fly for a company that can stand on its own…. Yeah, UPS and FedEx may have something to say about this |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3316884)
Last time I checked, ACMI are 121 carriers, pay more than NetJets...
|
Originally Posted by MinRest
(Post 3316760)
Don't get mad because I gave my opinion. If you don't like how forums work, don't log in. Everyone said the airline industry was too big to fail, and that has proven true. That is better job security than betting on NJA still being around when Uncle Warren kicks the bucket.
Oh and you are flying for a company that furloughed the highest percentage of pilots out of ALL the airlines in 2009. Are you seriously using FAs being assaulted as a defense of staying at NJA? Are you mental? 100% of pilots working for airlines don't have to see TEB 6 times a month. Enjoy the Hanoi Hilton! oh, and I probably saw TEB a grand total of 3 times in the past year. And the Hilton has been renovated and the kitchen does a great job - I recommend the rack of lamb. |
TEB Hilton one of the few places to get eggs benedict included in the rate. It does a good job softening the blow of being in TEB.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 3316884)
Last time I checked, ACMI are 121 carriers, pay more than NetJets, and for most of them there is no jumpseating or commuting.
And no lav cleaning either. Don't get me wrong, NetJets is a fine 135. And it works for a lot of people. But there are other non-commuting options out there, including 121. But I’m sure it’s a fine place to see the world from another perspective. |
Originally Posted by ZebraSpots
(Post 3317001)
Atlas Cargo? Doubtful.
But I’m sure it’s a fine place to see the world from another perspective. |
Originally Posted by Blueridger
(Post 3317051)
For 17 days straight no less.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands