Search
Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

Union Dues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2022, 06:21 PM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
Default

Originally Posted by Pervis View Post
Fine. Renting is money down the river. Ownership is equity in hand. When I retire do I get my share of this equity, paid for with my dues, as a separation check? Don’t bother to answer. I know I’ll be disappointed.
I know you're not that dumb. You have received dues refunds like the rest of us have, no?
Flyfalcons is offline  
Old 05-23-2022, 06:59 AM
  #132  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Default

Originally Posted by OnTheMeridian View Post
Disagreement is fine. In fact, it's healthy for an organization such as ours to engage in spirited debate, float other ideas.

The problem here is that a vocal minority are trying to make this out to be some sort of big, divisive thing to our union, especially if there isn't another vote. But it's not. More people regularly engage in a myriad of threads on every topic than what you can see in the union building threads. I'm running into many pilots on the road, sharing hotel vans and FBO lobbies and lounges. I've heard no one even discussing the building. Its just not a "thing" for most of our group. They're content to let our union leaders lead. There won't be any big break between the membership if the building is done without another vote.

The GMM is on May 25. Anyone can attend, either in person or via phone. We have over 2600 pilots and I'll bet fewer than 50 bother attending or calling in. I'll be attending via phone. But it's not going to be a high interest subject. A small group (very small) will be upset if there isn't another vote. The vast majority will continue on as always.

I respect your opinion, but yes, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
The bylaws don’t require a vote and there won’t be a vote.

But I just think it would be smarter for the E Board to do a follow up quick and dirty survey so those opposed can’t argue that they were ignored.

I know it will be built, in cash. The money is already in the bank, not in a pilot’s pocket, and already spent in the minds of the EBoard and a large portion of the membership. Perfectly compliant with the bylaws. But still, not smart poker.
GeeWizDriver is offline  
Old 05-26-2022, 01:10 PM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 135
Default

I have flown with other pilots recently that seem to have been doing 11/2 since July. From a general consensus standpoint, is the current pace on the road along with these questionable schedules sustainable?
HeavyD is offline  
Old 05-26-2022, 04:20 PM
  #134  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Default

Originally Posted by HeavyD View Post
I have flown with other pilots recently that seem to have been doing 11/2 since July. From a general consensus standpoint, is the current pace on the road along with these questionable schedules sustainable?
I can't control what schedule other pilots fly so I don't worry about it. I'm a 7-7 guy through and through with a very occasional volunteer extended day. I'm probably leaving a load of money on the table but divorces are expensive too....
GeeWizDriver is offline  
Old 06-05-2022, 03:54 PM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 286
Default

No dog in this fight yet. But, where your union reps are matters not.

WHO and how effective they are is THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS.

I’ve been sold out by ALPA and APA—both have awesome offices…

Choose wisely.

TC
AA717driver is offline  
Old 06-22-2022, 12:11 PM
  #136  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by hawkerpilot05 View Post
The ARC submitted their recommendations and the FAA is evaluating it. The FAA will then release the final draft with any changes. It is then when we will see what it entails and everyone will get a chance to comment on it. I don't think it will be nearly as restrictive as part 117 due to the cost to the industry. Hence why 121 freight was not included in the part 117 regs.

Sent from my SM-N986U using Tapatalk
Ok, thanks. I thought maybe GeeWizDriver might have more info since the part 117 tables were referenced as potentially part of the part 135 proposal.
NightCargo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
beech1980
Part 135
1191
06-19-2022 05:02 PM
Want2BAtlasAv8r
Hiring News
121
06-15-2018 07:26 PM
astroglydenn
Flexjet
6
05-16-2018 03:49 AM
BoilerUP
Regional
9
09-01-2007 04:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices