![]() |
Originally Posted by tlamjaj
(Post 2700453)
My last trip had a 2 number but was solely 700s :confused:
If you are on reserve, it doesn’t matter it seems. They will code the pairings as they see fit. I am sure I’ve seen all three during a reserve pairing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 2701182)
If you are on reserve, it doesn’t matter it seems. They will code the pairings as they see fit. I am sure I’ve seen all three during a reserve pairing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by Jecain7
(Post 2701208)
Yea while on reserve i'd be excited to see a 700 trip on my schedule only to have a deuce roll up with no APU. Holding a line i've never seen this.
I agree if you are a line holder the pairing codings are the key. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Not sure the best place to post this, couldn’t find anything recent thru search functions... Can anyone speak to the PSA PHL base? How senior is it? How is the QOL? Thanks.
|
Originally Posted by LineUp
(Post 2712859)
Not sure the best place to post this, couldn’t find anything recent thru search functions... Can anyone speak to the PSA PHL base? How senior is it? How is the QOL? Thanks.
|
Originally Posted by Irishblackbird
(Post 2712922)
Go back to about page 47-48 on this thread and there is a spread sheet posted. PHL looks like around 10 months to hold a line as an FO, and 3 and a half years to hold a line as a CA. PHL is a relatively new and small base for PSA. Not sure if your looking for CA or FO. All bases with the exception of ORF on the CA side are north of 3.5 years to hold a line. FO's are approaching a year now with the exception of DAY. Unless we get more planes or attrition picks up, we are getting fat on pilots. I have heard of guys going 2 months or more without flying, on both sides of the cockpit.
There are some who seem to think that AAG will announce further growth beyond the 150 airframes. Or else why would they keep us so fat on pilots? |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 2712935)
Or else why would they keep us so fat on pilots?
|
Originally Posted by Malcolm Tent
(Post 2712966)
Maybe AAG Expects increasing attrition as the retirement wave hits. If this were the case you might expect to see all WO’s fat with FOs.
At Piedmont, the opposite seems to be the case. They don't have enough CA's, and they have a bottleneck with training, and guys are leaving that are waiting in the que. In terms of growth at PSA, I don't see this happening beyond the 150 airframes, I think most regional's will actually contract if there is pressure on the pilot supply. No evidence to support my theory, just a hunch. |
Originally Posted by Irishblackbird
(Post 2712922)
Go back to about page 47-48 on this thread and there is a spread sheet posted. PHL looks like around 10 months to hold a line as an FO, and 3 and a half years to hold a line as a CA. PHL is a relatively new and small base for PSA. Not sure if your looking for CA or FO. All bases with the exception of ORF on the CA side are north of 3.5 years to hold a line. FO's are approaching a year now with the exception of DAY. Unless we get more planes or attrition picks up, we are getting fat on pilots. I have heard of guys going 2 months or more without flying, on both sides of the cockpit.
|
Originally Posted by 272922
(Post 2697464)
Rumor has it that MaCrOs doesn't work here anymore, so The Tall One posted something on the now official ALPA forum. I guess ALPA peeps can't post here any more though.
I'm not on there presently. Probably missing out on TONS of new gossip and rumors that will never materialize... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:38 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands