Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   PSA Airlines (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/psa-airlines/)
-   -   The Useful PSA Thread (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/psa-airlines/84171-useful-psa-thread.html)

nuball5 02-04-2016 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by CBreezy (Post 2062755)
And your point is...? When that speed thing gets too low and you stall, it's not because your airplane can't perform like other airplanes. It's because you were reading the paper and quit paying attention. That has nothing to do with a different type. Should you not be allowed to fly at Max Gross Weight a trip after repo-ing an airplane because they handle differently?

Someone was speculating that the FAA wants PSA to not mix CRJ series due to some incident or series of incidents. If that crew had been flying something with better performance than a -200 and all of a sudden is paired with a -200 on a hot summer day, yeah I could see that potentially becoming a situational awareness issue. Where you forget which CRJ series you're operating reading the USA Today. Obviously that wasn't the sole cause, but the FAA has a history of knee-jerk reactions. Ask Skywest -200 operators what altitude they can climb up to.

FirstClass 02-04-2016 11:47 AM


Originally Posted by daOldMan (Post 2062719)
Why?

The FAA does not want PSA to operate the 200's and 700/900's interchangeable with the same pilots. It is causing a variety of problems, including several potentially disastrous incidents lately.

What's that got to do with PSA internal seniority issues? They can be tacked on to the bottom no different. They can have the 200s as well.

AutoPirateOn 02-04-2016 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by joek (Post 2062734)
[/B]

like what?


3 700's were damaged. 2 cracked wing spars from hard landings and 1 toasted engine from being left in toga for too long.

FlyyGuyy 02-04-2016 01:03 PM


Originally Posted by AutoPirateOn (Post 2062817)
3 700's were damaged. 2 cracked wing spars from hard landings and 1 toasted engine from being left in toga for too long.

toasted an engine from being in toga too long?

how exactly is that possible? there isnt a limitation on it. 2 mins at 963 degrees and 5 at 947 is the only TOGA limit that would burn one up, i don't think ive ever seen them that high, certainly not if you are FLEXing. i also see the the limit at 5 mins for toga...no idea how that gets missed (its on the after t/o checks on the 200 and 7-900)

i can see toasting a 200 because you forget there is no fadec and firewall it on a go around or something.

the hard landings....thats totally believable. I see FO's continuously forget to stop the decent before landing...that falls on the training department.


I'm all for separating the 200/7-900 on a bid. If I never fly a 200 again itll be too soon. They fly like crap.

Biggz 02-04-2016 01:33 PM

I don't see the big deal in flying all models. It's not that difficult of a concept. For the people doing hard landings, all they have to do is attempt a flare. The landing won't be soft but it won't hurt anything. And as the person said earlier, the climb power is on the after take off checks so.....yeah

JohnnyDingus 02-04-2016 01:36 PM

Blame it on the navy pilots


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FlyyGuyy 02-04-2016 02:38 PM


Originally Posted by JohnnyDingus (Post 2062861)
Blame it on the navy pilots


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yea, those darn navy pilots.

had a passenger say the takeoff was a carrier takeoff the other day...
that was a new one...

1stCivDivPilot 02-04-2016 02:51 PM


Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy (Post 2062888)
yea, those darn navy pilots.

had a passenger say the takeoff was a carrier takeoff the other day...
that was a new one...

I have been tempted to do a carrier rendezvous.

AutoPirateOn 02-04-2016 05:08 PM


Originally Posted by FlyyGuyy (Post 2062846)
toasted an engine from being in toga too long?

how exactly is that possible? there isnt a limitation on it. 2 mins at 963 degrees and 5 at 947 is the only TOGA limit that would burn one up, i don't think ive ever seen them that high, certainly not if you are FLEXing. i also see the the limit at 5 mins for toga...no idea how that gets missed (its on the after t/o checks on the 200 and 7-900)

i can see toasting a 200 because you forget there is no fadec and firewall it on a go around or something.

the hard landings....thats totally believable. I see FO's continuously forget to stop the decent before landing...that falls on the training department.


I'm all for separating the 200/7-900 on a bid. If I never fly a 200 again itll be too soon. They fly like crap.


How about, "damaged the engine beyond economic repair" rather than toasted? Leaving the thrust in the toga detent for all of takeoff/climb/cruise could possibly over temp them, especially up at altitude. I know it's on the checklist, but we've all missed items on there.

JohnnyDingus 02-04-2016 05:43 PM


Originally Posted by AutoPirateOn (Post 2062989)
How about, "damaged the engine beyond economic repair" rather than toasted? Leaving the thrust in the toga detent for all of takeoff/climb/cruise could possibly over temp them, especially up at altitude. I know it's on the checklist, but we've all missed items on there.


Well your n1 tolerance gets higher as you go up. So if it's in Togo it would stay at whatever setting it was at for takeoff. I would say an average climb n1 would be 94-95ish once you get throw the upper teens?? Togo is 80's to very low 90's.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:24 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands