Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   PSA Airlines (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/psa-airlines/)
-   -   PSA or TSA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/psa-airlines/85486-psa-tsa.html)

Saabs 12-16-2014 08:41 AM


Originally Posted by TheFly (Post 1784525)
1. Avoid commuting.
2. QOL & pay (not just 1st year).
3. Avoid bottom feeder companies; help us set the bar higher.
4. Look at the big picture on the above 3.

Avoid step 3 if you want to see progression .

CLT Guy 12-16-2014 08:56 AM


Originally Posted by Saabs (Post 1784551)
Avoid step 3 if you want to see progression .

Aren't they all bottom feeders? Every one of them has negative qualities that can be pointed out easily.

Pick the one that has what is important to you. Commuting to work, especially on reserve, can cost thousands of dollars a year. For me, I chose somewhere that I could live in base. That alone makes up for another one paying a few more nickels an hour in pay.

QoL, schedule, work rules, and domicile/commuting all mean much more to me than the differences in pay. If the differences in pay were substantial, it would be different, but they aren't.

Hou757 12-16-2014 09:18 AM

Neither. Both are awful..

pagey 12-16-2014 09:25 AM


Originally Posted by Hou757 (Post 1784597)
Neither. Both are awful..

What a useful, thought-out, intelligent, helpful addition....:rolleyes:

Do you have specific reasons, with sources to site?

Do you have an alternate suggestion for him? With specific, factual reasons why your suggestion might be better?

Have you worked at either one? Perhaps you could share your first hand experiences.

Do you have any idea, at all, what you are talking about?

Riverside 12-16-2014 09:27 AM


Originally Posted by Hou757 (Post 1784597)
Neither. Both are awful..

Still crying over there.

djrogs03 12-16-2014 09:33 AM


Originally Posted by Timma (Post 1784430)
Ok.. What about the 50 firm plus 50 options for the MRJ we have.. (Plus 50/50 E2 Jets) Our contract is waaaay better! We make more flying a 50 seater than most places flying 70+ seat rj's. Run run run for the shiny jets..! Please..

Last time I checked Holdings hadn't decided which subsidiary those MRJ's or EJet V2's were going too, if they even get them. Ide hate for someone to make career decision on something that may never come to fruition....

FlyingKat 12-16-2014 09:44 AM


Originally Posted by djrogs03 (Post 1784608)
Last time I checked Holdings hadn't decided which subsidiary those MRJ's or EJet V2's were going too, if they even get them. Ide hate for someone to make career decision on something that may never come to fruition....

Trans States get the first 10 MRJs.

8hourrule 12-16-2014 10:51 AM


Originally Posted by FlyingKat (Post 1784618)
Quote:





Originally Posted by djrogs03


Last time I checked Holdings hadn't decided which subsidiary those MRJ's or EJet V2's were going too, if they even get them. Ide hate for someone to make career decision on something that may never come to fruition....




Trans States get the first 10 MRJs.

To fly for who? Hulas will sell the delivery slots for a profit.

tom11011 12-16-2014 10:54 AM


Originally Posted by 8hourrule (Post 1784685)
To fly for who? Hulas will sell the delivery slots for a profit.

It takes time and money to get a new airplane added to your certificate. It's not like scalping baseball tickets out on the corner of Carnegie and Ontario. I'm sure some thought went into acquiring these airplanes.

FlyingKat 12-16-2014 12:00 PM


Originally Posted by 8hourrule (Post 1784685)
To fly for who? Hulas will sell the delivery slots for a profit.

Not what we've heard lately. Company reps have been back and forth to Japan since the rollout. Planes are definetely coming to TSA, they have a way to solve the weight issue, and they are hoping to beat the current deliversy schedule by six months.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands