Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > PSA Airlines
Transfer of 70 seat aircraft to PSA in doubt >

Transfer of 70 seat aircraft to PSA in doubt

Search
Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

Transfer of 70 seat aircraft to PSA in doubt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2015, 08:36 AM
  #141  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,487
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
Didn't you hear? He is in the quaterly Aspen meetings with the head of the FAA. There's no other explanation for claiming that the FAA would never approve another Aspen program.
Oh, just like how 404, as a Compass pilot, gets to sit in on all these high level AAG meetings regarding the fleet plans at the wholly owned regionals.

Got it.
TallFlyer is offline  
Old 05-31-2015, 08:57 AM
  #142  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by diva View Post
Let me help you understand. He said "PSA won't be able to staff the CR7's from Envoy and transfer of the Entire fleet won't happend". FAA clearly said PSA won't be Aspen Qualified. Only two carriers FAA approved are skw and Envoy and there won't be any new Aspen programs for other operators. That leaves Envoy to continue fly the CRJ-700's.

How many CRJ200's were PSA parking again?

Well once again, another Envoy idiot devoid of facts. Republic is also ASE qualified... they fly Q400 in there daily. AA runs two flights a day, seasonally into ASE. In the grand scheme of things, they could just pull out. If you think that just because PSA is currently not certified for ASE ops is the reason that maybe just maybe the CR7 are going to stay at Envoy, then you are more disillusioned then previously thought.

The 700's are leaving. Period. Y'all played chess with Doug Parker, and he won. It's time to move on.
air101 is offline  
Old 05-31-2015, 09:01 AM
  #143  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Originally Posted by diva View Post
Let me help you understand. He said "PSA won't be able to staff the CR7's from Envoy and transfer of the Entire fleet won't happend". FAA clearly said PSA won't be Aspen Qualified. Only two carriers FAA approved are skw and Envoy and there won't be any new Aspen programs for other operators. That leaves Envoy to continue fly the CRJ-700's.

How many CRJ200's were PSA parking again?
Aspen? Who cares? Dump it.

700's are on there way. We're very sorry for your loss.
FirstClass is offline  
Old 05-31-2015, 09:10 AM
  #144  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,239
Default




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JohnnyDingus is offline  
Old 05-31-2015, 09:38 AM
  #145  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

pagey is offline  
Old 05-31-2015, 09:47 AM
  #146  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,239
Default




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JohnnyDingus is offline  
Old 05-31-2015, 10:05 AM
  #147  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyDingus View Post



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LMAO... Nice
joek is offline  
Old 05-31-2015, 01:13 PM
  #148  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Buzzlightyear's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 569
Default

Originally Posted by air101 View Post
Well once again, another Envoy idiot devoid of facts. Republic is also ASE qualified... they fly Q400 in there daily. AA runs two flights a day, seasonally into ASE. In the grand scheme of things, they could just pull out. If you think that just because PSA is currently not certified for ASE ops is the reason that maybe just maybe the CR7 are going to stay at Envoy, then you are more disillusioned then previously thought.

The 700's are leaving. Period. Y'all played chess with Doug Parker, and he won. It's time to move on.
AA mainline does not serve Aspen with two flights daily seasonally. They do Vail seasonally.
Buzzlightyear is offline  
Old 05-31-2015, 01:42 PM
  #149  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 132
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665 View Post
Why are we sending planes to you, if you are also sending planes to TSA?
Originally Posted by air101 View Post
Because United owns the XJT planes and SKW Inc refused to continue flying them for a loss, so off to TSA they go. AAG must have offered more favorable terms...
Rumor is that the only reason XJT got the 16 was because AAG looked at TSA and figured out that TSA couldn't staff all the flying.
xjtgrunt is offline  
Old 05-31-2015, 01:46 PM
  #150  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Position: Downward Dog
Posts: 1,877
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyDingus View Post



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bad juju brah.
WesternSkies is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1st Supersonic
Atlas/Polar
20442
05-02-2024 06:49 AM
Golden Bear
Engineers & Technicians
8
04-29-2017 12:30 PM
bigtime209
PSA Airlines
194
09-30-2013 11:45 AM
SQUAWK3274
Military
12
02-21-2012 04:52 PM
ryan1234
Hangar Talk
8
04-02-2010 09:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices