Military
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Why is it ok to be hired at regional with "low time" or "lack of currency" but not a major? Especially for a mil guy. What's the difference? Is it not the same job? Same mainline passengers, 90% of which haven't the slightest clue that they aren't even on a mainline jet. In the same airspace. Same weather. Same airports. Same controllers. Same everything. I would love to hear the logic.
#22
I hear you on the "I don't know what I don't know"! I've been talking to all my military friends who have made this leap and have gotten plucked out by a major fairly quickly. I've picked their brains to probably an annoying state. As far as commuting goes, that's tough and I'm a bit scared to find out how that will go. Who knows where you'd get based but it is a part of that leap of faith we're all taking on this. Then, if we get picked up by a major, we'll probably commute again for a while until we figure the rest of our lives out 

*Note: all of the below is opinion and based on shady, at best, assumptions based on reading.
It does seem like the reserve life at a major is less of a "beatings continue until morale improves" setup. I'm sure it's not still rosy - but two things. 1) there are many things I've read regarding reserve at a regional that I don't see come up with reserve at a major: junior manned being one of them. 2) the paycheck tends to ease some of the pain (unless you've set yourself up for a wicked commute to reserve. Not sure you can pay your way out of that?)
#23
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Why is it ok to be hired at regional with "low time" or "lack of currency" but not a major? Especially for a mil guy. What's the difference? Is it not the same job? Same mainline passengers, 90% of which haven't the slightest clue that they aren't even on a mainline jet. In the same airspace. Same weather. Same airports. Same controllers. Same everything. I would love to hear the logic.
Major airline programs that I have talked with people about assume that you have been flying 121 and know that part of the business and the training can be done at a much faster pace.
There is a marginal probability that a non-current mil pilot will fail 121 training and lose their job and carry a black mark on their record. The assumption (valid or not) is that the probability of them failing at a regional is lower and that will reduce the probability of them subsequently failing at a major.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,279
Likes: 101
That's valid, and in the calculus for sure. Most of my research is going into weighing the slightly slower rate of gaining hours at a fractional vice the QOL issues of commuting to a regional. I can drive to a NJ base as if it were an every morning drive to work; but also have a few options (depending on the regional) for direct flights to commute.
My problem is - I don't know what I don't know. And what I don't know about regional 121 life is somewhere around "everything."
My problem is - I don't know what I don't know. And what I don't know about regional 121 life is somewhere around "everything."

No doubt!
*Note: all of the below is opinion and based on shady, at best, assumptions based on reading.
It does seem like the reserve life at a major is less of a "beatings continue until morale improves" setup. I'm sure it's not still rosy - but two things. 1) there are many things I've read regarding reserve at a regional that I don't see come up with reserve at a major: junior manned being one of them. 2) the paycheck tends to ease some of the pain (unless you've set yourself up for a wicked commute to reserve. Not sure you can pay your way out of that?)
*Note: all of the below is opinion and based on shady, at best, assumptions based on reading.
It does seem like the reserve life at a major is less of a "beatings continue until morale improves" setup. I'm sure it's not still rosy - but two things. 1) there are many things I've read regarding reserve at a regional that I don't see come up with reserve at a major: junior manned being one of them. 2) the paycheck tends to ease some of the pain (unless you've set yourself up for a wicked commute to reserve. Not sure you can pay your way out of that?)
But listening to a legacy pilot complain about reserve is funny. Especially if their perspective/frame of reference contains ZERO regional reserve.
Its been explained to me that regional training is set up to take pilots with mostly piston CFI work and get them working in a high performance turbine world. In other words...slightly different pace than at a major.
Major airline programs that I have talked with people about assume that you have been flying 121 and know that part of the business and the training can be done at a much faster pace.
There is a marginal probability that a non-current mil pilot will fail 121 training and lose their job and carry a black mark on their record. The assumption (valid or not) is that the probability of them failing at a regional is lower and that will reduce the probability of them subsequently failing at a major.
Major airline programs that I have talked with people about assume that you have been flying 121 and know that part of the business and the training can be done at a much faster pace.
There is a marginal probability that a non-current mil pilot will fail 121 training and lose their job and carry a black mark on their record. The assumption (valid or not) is that the probability of them failing at a regional is lower and that will reduce the probability of them subsequently failing at a major.
Do mil guys have a problem in training, NOPE. But a legacy's program is set to draw upon an already built foundation of experience.
What a mil pilot has to draw on isn't so much the stick and rudder skill set, they've ALREADY got that. It's more of the learning curve of the civ/121 way of doing things.
Again, it's not some rocket surgery, thousands upon thousands have done it with ZERO ISSUES.
It's just where they have to draw their stengthss from, as in learning something new and quickly, without much time or explaination, etc.
#25
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
This is true, although it can depend on the regional. As well as said regional's specific base/fleet. Some guys getting worked (flying a lot) and some guys spending a lot of time at home inverting bourbon bottles.
But listening to a legacy pilot complain about reserve is funny. Especially if their perspective/frame of reference contains ZERO regional reserve.
What is the main difference between regional reserve vs legacy?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,279
Likes: 101
Days off, long call, etc.
Let's just say that even though a major/legacy pilot may complain about being on reserve, its way more "gentlemanly" than at a regional.
The post bankruptcy era has made great strides that way.
#27
When I was an RJ Captain around 1999-2000 flew with many new FO's straight out of fighters, etc. All extremely sharp guys. Majors were hiring and they got picked up quick. Every female with 500 PIC also.
Last edited by Cruz Clearance; 03-31-2017 at 10:29 PM.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
It all goes back to "known product." Whether its the military or a college program or academy, the product or the syllabus is formal and known.
On the other hand Bill Bob's Flying School might actually turn out a better pilot, but there is no brand recognition.
Now if you are a pilot recruiter and went through an XYZ program which you obviously thought was good, who would you be partial towards?
Recruiters prefer stable, formal, known programs.
On the other hand Bill Bob's Flying School might actually turn out a better pilot, but there is no brand recognition.
Now if you are a pilot recruiter and went through an XYZ program which you obviously thought was good, who would you be partial towards?
Recruiters prefer stable, formal, known programs.
#29
New Hire
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
I'm a retired AF pilot, 3500 hrs in 135s and T-1s. Been out of the cockpit for about 3 yrs. Am contemplating leaving the corporate world and returning to the cockpit. Im operating on the assumption at regionals are a must given my lack of currency. But I'll be honest, the pay and lifestyle (commuting) seem pretty rough. Looking to hear from anyone who has gone down this road.
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
I'm a retired AF pilot, 3500 hrs in 135s and T-1s. Been out of the cockpit for about 3 yrs. Am contemplating leaving the corporate world and returning to the cockpit. Im operating on the assumption at regionals are a must given my lack of currency. But I'll be honest, the pay and lifestyle (commuting) seem pretty rough. Looking to hear from anyone who has gone down this road.
Lots of folks on the board are in the same spot that you are in. Same situation as those leaving the military from staff tours (including me).
Financially plan on 12-18 months at a regional. Regional will give you the most "points" on your application. Getting 100+ hours of recent turbine time as a professional pilot will also count but doesn't check the 121 box.
Biggest hurdle seems to be digesting the QOL issues that are certain when you return to flying. You will take a pay cut for the first 2-3 years (assuming you get hired by a major after 1) and unless you live or plan to live where you will be based - you will have to commute which cuts into days off.
The majors stress that they aren't hiring good pilots - they are hiring good leaders that also happen to be well trained pilots. As you write your applications - start now - highlight leadership in the air and on the ground. Each airline application is worse than filling in an SF86.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



