Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Airline Job and Flight instruction on side ? >

Airline Job and Flight instruction on side ?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Airline Job and Flight instruction on side ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2017 | 01:10 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default Airline Job and Flight instruction on side ?

Hey Everyone,

Just wondering after getting a job at one of the regionals coming at it from a flight instruction background, is it possible (legal) to do flight instruction on my days off ?
I spoke to some of my friends who do both and they kind of left it as a gray area.
I know the airline has forms that you can fill out and send out for approval to the HR Dept but being a new hire I wanted to get opinions of the community before I decide to do so.
Reply
Old 08-23-2017 | 08:16 PM
  #2  
TiredSoul's Avatar
All is fine at .79
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,490
Likes: 42
From: Paahlot
Default

Flight instructing counts as commercial flying and therefore to your quarterly and yearly totals.
It's kind of sour for your primary employer to not be able to schedule you because of the amount of flying you do on the side.
Also consider accidents, incidents or violations affecting your main job and your airline career.
I've chosen not to for several reasons;
I'd consider teaching ground school as that's something I've always enjoyed anyway but no flying.
Not too interested in SE flying for now and I don't want to take away somebody else's ME time.
Somebody who still needs it.
I haven't flown a SE or any piston for that matter in 3.5 years.
I'm slowly starting to think about doing a flight here of there with friends that still fly GA.
Reply
Old 08-24-2017 | 11:23 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default

[MENTION=69490]TiredSoul[/MENTION], thanks just what i wanted to know.
Reply
Old 08-24-2017 | 07:57 PM
  #4  
dsmith3631's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: B747-400/-8 FO
Default

According to FAR 117.23, the only time counted is that flown "by flightcrew members on behalf of any certificate holder or 91K Program Manager". As far as I know, there has never been an interpretation to expand certificate holder to anything beyond 121 or 91k operators. At my last airline, they asked for all commercial hours, but only recorded 121 and 91k hours for FAR 117 purposes. If you wanted to instruct on the side, you only need to inform the CP and have an acknowledgement from him. YMMV.
Reply
Old 08-25-2017 | 03:19 AM
  #5  
TiredSoul's Avatar
All is fine at .79
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,490
Likes: 42
From: Paahlot
Default

And you're incorrect

Assuming that the instructor is receiving compensation, the FAA considers time spent acting as a flight instructor under parts 61 and 141 to be other commercial flying under part 135. Legal Interpretation 1990-32 (Oct. 31, 1990).
Besides 117 is the wrong reg as those are rest rules and not cumulative flight times per month/quarter/calendar year.

Last edited by TiredSoul; 08-25-2017 at 03:29 AM.
Reply
Old 08-25-2017 | 06:56 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Admiral
Default

FAR 117.23 superseded the 121 cumulative regulations.
The Letter of Interpretation Tired Soul brings up is null and void.
However your airline may impose additional limitations.
Reply
Old 08-25-2017 | 07:11 AM
  #7  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Flyhayes
FAR 117.23 superseded the 121 cumulative regulations.
The Letter of Interpretation Tired Soul brings up is null and void.
However your airline may impose additional limitations.
Correct.

Only outside 121/91k flying counts against your rest/duty/flight time limitations under 117.

Some airlines still have policy limits on ANY outside flying, but you could address that with the airline, it's not regulatory.
Reply
Old 08-25-2017 | 07:32 AM
  #8  
TiredSoul's Avatar
All is fine at .79
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,490
Likes: 42
From: Paahlot
Default

Mmmmm...ok I stand corrected.
So how does the FAA look upon 8 hrs of flight instruction followed by a commute and a 121 revenue leg?
Essentially a self inflicted 16+ hrs duty day?
'Careless and reckless' ?
Reply
Old 08-25-2017 | 08:05 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Admiral
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
Mmmmm...ok I stand corrected.
So how does the FAA look upon 8 hrs of flight instruction followed by a commute and a 121 revenue leg?
Essentially a self inflicted 16+ hrs duty day?
'Careless and reckless' ?
That's an entirely different question.
Reply
Old 08-25-2017 | 05:26 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TiredSoul
Mmmmm...ok I stand corrected.
So how does the FAA look upon 8 hrs of flight instruction followed by a commute and a 121 revenue leg?
Essentially a self inflicted 16+ hrs duty day?
'Careless and reckless' ?
You have to declare and sign yourself fit for duty. It's your signature, whether electronic or paper.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PinnacleFO
Regional
53
12-13-2010 12:04 PM
Ferlofodder
Foreign
5
07-23-2010 04:19 PM
MobiusOne
Foreign
12
05-09-2008 09:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices