![]() |
Originally Posted by pangolin
(Post 2811893)
76 seaters are not being added to any regional fleet in the US. If they made such a machine it would be to replace existing 76 seat aircraft at best. Considering the cost of an airframe - and the engineering to mount a GTF nacelle on the empennage I can see why they say there’s no savings.
|
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2811917)
Wait what? XJT is not getting their 175's? Neither is Envoy?
|
Originally Posted by OpMidClimax
(Post 2811922)
I believe they are talking about additional 76 planes at the legacies. All are scoped out and they are just moving numbers around..
I believe they are talking out of their a**. |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2811926)
So who is losing 14 76-seaters for AA this year because Envoy is getting 14 (or 16) new airframes in 2019.
I believe they are talking out of their a**. |
Originally Posted by OpMidClimax
(Post 2811936)
Several aa ffd have lost flying this year. AA is maxed out on scope for 76 seats, especially with the reduction in NB fleet occurring this year.
Who even provides 76-seat feed for AA? Compass, Envoy, Mesa and Republic? Who of them has lost flying in any meaningful numbers this year? |
Originally Posted by pangolin
(Post 2811893)
76 seaters are not being added to any regional fleet in the US. If they made such a machine it would be to replace existing 76 seat aircraft at best. Considering the cost of an airframe - and the engineering to mount a GTF nacelle on the empennage I can see why they say there’s no savings.
|
Originally Posted by msprj2
(Post 2811985)
Then why are MIT and emb designing new RJ’s? It’s replacement for current ones
GF |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2811953)
76 seaters? Who?
Who even provides 76-seat feed for AA? Compass, Envoy, Mesa and Republic? Who of them has lost flying in any meaningful numbers this year? |
Originally Posted by dera
(Post 2811926)
So who is losing 14 76-seaters for AA this year because Envoy is getting 14 (or 16) new airframes in 2019.
I believe they are talking out of their a**. |
Originally Posted by msprj2
(Post 2811985)
Then why are MIT and emb designing new RJ’s? It’s replacement for current ones
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:19 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands