Pilot Shortage: Real or Nah?
#81
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Another way to look at it...
Pilots are only worth the lowest common denominator (ie regional FO) and that is determined by market forces. . Any pilot who gets paid more than that is a special case, and management only tolerates that if the plane in question has enough capacity to generate revenue.
#82
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Your value to the company is directly proportional to the revenue you create. They can't pay a guy flying a 50 seat jet the same as a guy flying a 166 seat jet. The revenue generated isn't even close. It's over 3 times the revenue on a much lower CASM.
This is the same reason major league sports players earn more than the minor league players. They play the same game, and do the same job. One just generates much more revenue.
This is the same reason major league sports players earn more than the minor league players. They play the same game, and do the same job. One just generates much more revenue.
#83
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,127
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
You will be hard pressed to find a major which will tolerate RJ feed that doesn't at least break even... only place you'll likely see it is if a major has too much free contracted and it's cheaper to fly it at a small loss than pay the penalties to cancel it.
#84
You’re also dealing with AA thought process. They pull the 767 out of BOS where it ran a profitable BOS-CDG route. Instead they fly them in a 737 from BOS to JFK to catch a CDG flight. Problem is they still have to compete with everybody doing BOS-CDG direct. So, the 737 flight becomes free costing AA big money. So, instead of competing they dump more routes.
JetBlue is now about to start NAT flying. Both United and Delta are planning to increase BOS flying... while AA continues to shrink BOS.
Most mismanaged airline since Eastern.
#85
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Doesn’t matter. The 50 seat jet produces a 50 seat paycheck. They made the money on the Hong Kong flight, not yours. They can get any regional to bring that connection, you’re nothing special. 50 seat pay for 50 seat flying. Want more? Go fly a bigger plane (except at Envoy, there a 12 yr 44 seat CA can make more than a 12 yr 76 seat CA.... another concession for management to save training cycles.
You’re also dealing with AA thought process. They pull the 767 out of BOS where it ran a profitable BOS-CDG route. Instead they fly them in a 737 from BOS to JFK to catch a CDG flight. Problem is they still have to compete with everybody doing BOS-CDG direct. So, the 737 flight becomes free costing AA big money. So, instead of competing they dump more routes.
JetBlue is now about to start NAT flying. Both United and Delta are planning to increase BOS flying... while AA continues to shrink BOS.
Most mismanaged airline since Eastern.
You’re also dealing with AA thought process. They pull the 767 out of BOS where it ran a profitable BOS-CDG route. Instead they fly them in a 737 from BOS to JFK to catch a CDG flight. Problem is they still have to compete with everybody doing BOS-CDG direct. So, the 737 flight becomes free costing AA big money. So, instead of competing they dump more routes.
JetBlue is now about to start NAT flying. Both United and Delta are planning to increase BOS flying... while AA continues to shrink BOS.
Most mismanaged airline since Eastern.
#86
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 991
Likes: 9
#87
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
#89
It’s a question of what the revenue generated can support for wages. Larger planes pay more because they can afford to.
But go on trying to pick a fight and argue with everybody.
#90
Banned
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
You’re taking it out of the context (not surprisingly) of the discussion comparing the 2500 TT regional guy to the 8000 hour mainline guy.
It’s a question of what the revenue generated can support for wages. Larger planes pay more because they can afford to.
But go on trying to pick a fight and argue with everybody.
It’s a question of what the revenue generated can support for wages. Larger planes pay more because they can afford to.
But go on trying to pick a fight and argue with everybody.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




