Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines
View Poll Results: How do you want to furlough?
Full Pay, Last Day
91
69.47%
2 Kinds of Pain
7
5.34%
Keep Everyone
33
25.19%
Voters: 131. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: Furlough Options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2020, 04:44 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 459
Default

I'd rather come back from my furlough with enough paycheck to save money again. Full pay to the last day.
hydrostream is offline  
Old 04-21-2020, 05:05 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 621
Default

FPTTLD absolutely.

And this is coming from someone who is squarely junior enough to be on the street on Oct 1st.
Bahamasflyer is offline  
Old 04-21-2020, 05:12 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bradthepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver View Post
Listen, there's being a dick pilot, and then there's being a straight dick. If there are pilots at a company sitting on the sidelines due to a furlough, and someone at the company is picking up open time, then that someone is helping the company keep furloughed pilots furloughed. That's squarely in the straight dick range.
I don't think you get it both ways. If you view someone as "scum" for picking up OT while there are still pilots sidelined, it is logically inconsistent to view someone who is ok with furloughs so long as they get their guarantee as anything other than scum. Or vice versa.

Personally, I'm happy to accept a temporary (i.e. reviewed-each-month) reduced monthly guarantee if it helps keep someone around longer.
bradthepilot is offline  
Old 04-21-2020, 05:14 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by bradthepilot View Post
I don't think you get it both ways. If you view someone as "scum" for picking up OT while there are still pilots sidelined, it is logically inconsistent to view someone who is ok with furloughs so long as they get their guarantee as anything other than scum. Or vice versa.

Personally, I'm happy to accept a temporary (i.e. reviewed-each-month) reduced monthly guarantee if it helps keep someone around longer.
interesting argument to square.
captive apple is offline  
Old 04-21-2020, 05:41 PM
  #25  
Porco Rosso
 
ninerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Default

Originally Posted by bradthepilot View Post
I don't think you get it both ways. If you view someone as "scum" for picking up OT while there are still pilots sidelined, it is logically inconsistent to view someone who is ok with furloughs so long as they get their guarantee as anything other than scum. Or vice versa.

Personally, I'm happy to accept a temporary (i.e. reviewed-each-month) reduced monthly guarantee if it helps keep someone around longer.
Whatever the MMG goes down to becomes the ceiling once bankruptcy starts. At that point, it might take years/half a decade/more to get back what was lost. Assuming one didn't sit on the couch the entire time, a one-to-two-year furlough with a return to full MMG might actually end up costing less than long-term reduced wages.

In order to protect that long-term MMG for everyone, you'd have to take the furloughs over the initial hit to MMG.

If I could 100% guarantee that a hit to MMG would be temporary and absolutely result with no furloughs, then I'd be in. I don't trust the company to not furlough later anyway, though, and I don't trust a bankruptcy court to not make MMG concessions semi-permanent.
ninerdriver is offline  
Old 04-21-2020, 05:44 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 1,280
Default

The airlines have nobody to blame but themselves for the full pay until the last day stance. At every downturn they have taken advantage of the labor force pulling this "we are all in this together" and "everybody needs to sacrifice" routine. But when things pick back up historically pay and QOL restoration lags behind by years. Meanwhile the Airline and their stockholders are making bank with record profits. We have to learn from our mistakes in the past.
LoneStar32 is offline  
Old 04-21-2020, 08:11 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 344
Default

It seems.to me that the company would prefer to have a higher MMG once times turn around since they are now getting more productivity out of each pilot. If you are using 4000 pilots at 75 hours a month instead of 6000 pilots at 50.hours a month you are still producing the same amount of Revenue passenger miles without needing 2000 more line checks, 2000 more sim checks, and 2000 health insurance policies.
additionally once a pilot hits the max social security income their hourly costs drop by the companies 6.2% FICA tax. There are more fixed costs each of us have that is more cost effective spread over more hours. At my company even just getting close to MMG instead of 12 to 25 hours over that is a pipe dream for jr guys.
herewego is offline  
Old 04-21-2020, 08:50 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigZ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,054
Default

Originally Posted by captive apple View Post
Company comes to you and says, "we have to cut pilot costs by 1/3 from monthly guarantee. We have three options, which do you pick?".

Note: The larger the furlough numbers = larger down grades. ie guarantee but at FO rates.
I find it hilarious that at the time of this posting 67% voted for full pay to the last day - makes perfect sense - 100-33=67 duuuh
BigZ is offline  
Old 04-22-2020, 01:18 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 74
Default

My new hire class got cancelled. I'd rather find another job than see you guys take pay cuts.
nate5ks is offline  
Old 04-22-2020, 04:31 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio View Post
This right here. Envoy gave concessions up the wa-zoo and it just recently got some watered down version of some of them back. Once you give something up it ain’t coming back, not without a fight.

It drives me crazy that the pilot groups are always the ones bailing out the company. Why does that always have to be the first knob they turn? My guess would be that traditionally it has always worked.
Pilot salaries (labor in general) are by far and away the largest controllable expense at most airlines. ESPECIALLY at a regional which IS a staffing company. Right or wrong this is where they have to go first. They NEED the bodies so concessions are better than furloughs from the company point of view. Ultimately as a pilot your QOL is tied up with your seniority. When there is a down turn THAT is what you are saving - not necessarily the company but in essence your goals are aligned in a down turn. So the company is going to over reach on concessions. Pilots will under reach. It’ll be a negotiation. Both have something to save and something to lose.
pangolin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3raser
Cargo
21
12-22-2012 10:01 AM
DirectLawOnly
United
45
12-05-2012 05:39 AM
Coto Pilot
United
123
12-04-2012 06:47 PM
Sonny Crockett
United
12
11-15-2012 05:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices