LW Carbon vs Briggs and Riley
#11
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
If it's space you want, give the LW Aurora a look. I haven't compared the insides to the traditional LW bags but sitting side by side with someone else's traditional LW, my Aurora looks like it carries significantly more. And it definitely carries more than my Briggs.
#13
Screen Toucher
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 221
Likes: 8
From: F/O
If it's space you want, give the LW Aurora a look. I haven't compared the insides to the traditional LW bags but sitting side by side with someone else's traditional LW, my Aurora looks like it carries significantly more. And it definitely carries more than my Briggs.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,607
Likes: 12
Edit: I just looked at Crew Outfitter’s website and they also show it out of stock.
Last edited by highfarfast; 04-17-2021 at 01:19 PM.
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,174
Likes: 157
I have to admit, I hate LW bags. They are not worth the premium you pay for them. Everything from the worthless snap straps inside to rails. Just not happy with them and much preferred my Travel Pro roller.
That said, I think I will be checking out the Strongbag next go around. I have their cooler and it is amazing.
That said, I think I will be checking out the Strongbag next go around. I have their cooler and it is amazing.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Ditto on the Aurora, I'm not a die hard LW guy or anything but I've had zero issues with the plastic frame. I've been using Auroras for last 5 years and for the cost I can afford to replace twice as often even if I did have an issue. Also its like 10 less pounds to drag around the airport.
#20
Sort of like how during a break an FA called my aviator glasses “so cliche.” I politely informed her that aviator glasses are excellent for....aviating.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




