Will having my ATP help or hurt me?
#71
#72
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2023
Position: 135 SIC
Posts: 193
skywest now does also as of this week. There’s another thread about it https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/skywest/147213-skywest-first-officer-advancement-agreement.html
#73
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2019
Posts: 424
I haven’t really been following this thread. But I understand there’s been a question about PIC time. I think this is what some people are getting at. This comes from the FEDEX careers page. I remember Delta and southwest use to have a very similar statement:
Q11: How does FedEx define Pilot in Command (PIC)?
A11: For minimum qualification purposes, PIC is defined as Captain/Aircraft Commander of record, not simply the sole manipulator of the controls. FedEx considers only pilot time in fixed wing aircraft toward minimum qualifications, and does not include simulator, helicopter, flight engineer, bombardier, navigator, RIO, EWO, WSO, NFO, or Special Crew.
https://careers.fedex.com/pilot-faq
I think this is what some individuals are trying to explain.
Q11: How does FedEx define Pilot in Command (PIC)?
A11: For minimum qualification purposes, PIC is defined as Captain/Aircraft Commander of record, not simply the sole manipulator of the controls. FedEx considers only pilot time in fixed wing aircraft toward minimum qualifications, and does not include simulator, helicopter, flight engineer, bombardier, navigator, RIO, EWO, WSO, NFO, or Special Crew.
https://careers.fedex.com/pilot-faq
I think this is what some individuals are trying to explain.
#74
#75
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 188
And now Skywest if you want to be moved to the front of the line. But that really misses the point. If you show up with an ATP or you get your ATP with your type checkride, why would one make it look like you would leave sooner?
#76
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 188
Funny thing is right after this post, you ask another question of "Random anonymous and unaccountable people". Why bother asking?
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 188
Here is the bottom line in a nutshell. If you need that "logged PIC" time to count towards ATP mins, many airlines will not even interview you because they have a thousand applications where they dont have ANY questions. They dont have enough time to call/interview people with questionable times. If you DONT need those hours to count towards ATP mins, then log it as SIC time, it doesnt hurt you. I flew right seat in a single pilot jet, did not have opspec to log it. I DID log the time because I wanted to show, A. Why I have an SIC rating and B. I have some jet time so I understand the FLight Level environment. To be clear, this time was NOT required for my ATP as I already had the ATP mins met. Nobody had a problem with it being "logged"
#78
Reserve Without End
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 146
His whole world is collapsing around him. He’s realizing he’s not actually pilot in command and he went and ticked off every airline out there with a faulty application. I’m willing to cut him slack as he finds his footing again.
#79
But for all part 121 jobs they are looking for it is exactly as you said, the person who was assigned PIC on the release.
#80
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2022
Posts: 253
No, you should not count sole manipulator time on part 91 or part 135 legs as PIC time on part 121 airline applications. You should count it as SIC time.
If you are worried about having enough PIC time for an ATP, review the requirements here:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/61.
159
Note that clicking on the hyperlinked pilot in command takes you to the FAR Part 1 definition of PIC:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id= 85212e95e8f157e5a26ba0cd5671237d&term_occur=999&te rm_src=Title:14:Chapter:I:Subchapter:Part:61:Sub part:G:61.159
So your sole manipulator time counts towards ATP requirements but airlines want to see only that FAR Part 1.1 definition of PIC time.
If you are worried about having enough PIC time for an ATP, review the requirements here:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/61.
159
Note that clicking on the hyperlinked pilot in command takes you to the FAR Part 1 definition of PIC:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/definitions/index.php?width=840&height=800&iframe=true&def_id= 85212e95e8f157e5a26ba0cd5671237d&term_occur=999&te rm_src=Title:14:Chapter:I:Subchapter:Part:61:Sub part:G:61.159
So your sole manipulator time counts towards ATP requirements but airlines want to see only that FAR Part 1.1 definition of PIC time.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post