Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Rocket Launcher found in Jersey City, right underneath EWR's Flight Path!!!!!!!!!!!! >

Rocket Launcher found in Jersey City, right underneath EWR's Flight Path!!!!!!!!!!!!

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Rocket Launcher found in Jersey City, right underneath EWR's Flight Path!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2007 | 10:05 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Default

I sure hope the FBI is collaborating with the experts over at the TSA.
Reply
Old 07-20-2007 | 10:18 AM
  #12  
Spartan07's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: C152
Default

Originally Posted by POPA
I sure hope the FBI is collaborating with the experts over at the TSA.
Because most of these surface to air missles are heat seeking TSA will probably come to the conclusion that aircraft can no longer produce heat, then they will spend some $$$ and find out what causes heat on the airplane. A couple weeks and much research later they will come to the conclusion that fuel in fact produces heat.

Therefore, No commercially operated flight in the United States will be allowed to carry fuel.
Reply
Old 07-20-2007 | 10:37 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 361
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
In our 32 memory items we don't seem to have one for missile strike. Guess we'll just make another one. 33 it is! Yay RAH.

#33 BOAKYAG
Reply
Old 07-20-2007 | 10:39 AM
  #14  
Dashdog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Spartan07
Because most of these surface to air missles are heat seeking TSA will probably come to the conclusion that aircraft can no longer produce heat, then they will spend some $$$ and find out what causes heat on the airplane. A couple weeks and much research later they will come to the conclusion that fuel in fact produces heat.

Therefore, No commercially operated flight in the United States will be allowed to carry fuel.

They can carry all the fuel they want as long as it's all divided into 3oz clear containers. Or maybe they'll demand that aircraft run on breastmilk.
Reply
Old 07-20-2007 | 12:03 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 1
From: FO
Default

Maybe some tried to fire it but it malfunctioned somehow. Unfortunately, it seems like it is only a matter of time before something like this happens.
Reply
Old 07-20-2007 | 12:08 PM
  #16  
azvandriver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: BE99 Single Pilot
Default

An AT-4 has a picture of a soldier on it. It was probably just an expended AT-4 launcher that every body that who has served in an infantry unit has in his attic.
Reply
Old 07-20-2007 | 12:30 PM
  #17  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 801
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

The good news about manpads is that they are not designed to shoot down airplanes...they are designed as a last-ditch defense for soldiers who are being attacked by tactical aircraft. They are intended to do at least enough damage to make the aircaft go away and stop bothering you.

The heat-seek feature works well, because most tactical airplanes have their heat sources (engines) together near the center of mass where all the tactical goodies are...in addition to getting both engines, you have a shot at avionics, control, and tactical systems as well.

Modern airliners tend to keep their engines away from the the other important stuff. It is no coincidence that the A-10, the best close air support plane ever made, has engines on pylons too.

The high level terrorists (al queda) are VERY conscious of public relations...they do not want to look like incompetent idiots on CNN. For this reason they rarely attempt "hail mary" type operations...too much risk of humiliating failure. They would not be inclined to attempt to use the wrong tool (a manpad) to shoot down a 757...they know darn well that it flys just fine on one engine and the end result would be a lot of press coverage about heroic airline pilots.
Reply
Old 07-20-2007 | 12:33 PM
  #18  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
In our 32 memory items we don't seem to have one for missile strike. Guess we'll just make another one. 33 it is! Yay RAH.
32 memory items? Damn! Who do you work for?
Reply
Old 07-20-2007 | 12:34 PM
  #19  
Spartan07's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: C152
Default

Originally Posted by azvandriver
An AT-4 has a picture of a soldier on it. It was probably just an expended AT-4 launcher that every body that who has served in an infantry unit has in his attic.
I don't have an AT-4 in my attic from my time in the grunts... I do however, have a empty TOW missle encasement...
Reply
Old 07-20-2007 | 12:34 PM
  #20  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 801
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by ERJ135
I would think that they would be more interested in hitting a 75/76 or 777 versus an ERJ. Its bigger easier to hit and a higher loss of life.

Actually an RJ would be a MUCH better target than a large airliner...it is similar in size and configuration to what the manpad is designed to hit, and has all the important parts located together.


A heavier airliner would probably just perform an single engine no-flap LDG, as has been demonstrated.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices