![]() |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 257692)
Oh, because its so much better than a 50 seater. NEWS FLASH!!! A 700/900 is still an RJ. You can put a bow on a terd, but its still a terd.
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257820)
As far as PAX go, it is much better.
|
Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
(Post 257725)
But pretty darn accurate!:D
I know you guys are in love with the 700/900s and probably feel like you got a couple brass ones swinging between your legs but that doesn't change the fact that THEY ARE STILL RJS!!! |
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 257824)
no its not, the seats are so uncomfortable, and the windows are down by their knees
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257827)
And yes I voted for ALPA
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257826)
It has nothing to do "our" love of the 700/900. They just make more sense to fly.
|
Originally Posted by otter
(Post 257820)
As far as PAX go, it is much better.
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 257824)
no its not, the seats are so uncomfortable, and the windows are down by their knees
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 258098)
No, they don't because the loads don't call for it. It makes sense to keep those RJ's on routes that have higher loads. Thats why they don't put the 700/900 on the same routes as the 120. Think about it.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 258098)
No, they don't because the loads don't call for it. It makes sense to keep those RJ's on routes that have higher loads. Thats why they don't put the 700/900 on the same routes as the 120. Think about it.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands