Selection process of regionals...
#31
I've heard that AWAC and Xjet does away the sim checks for their selection process... Are there any other regionals that does that? How do those regionals actually "test" out the flying abilities of an applicant? I mean do many of the lower hour pilots get washed out from the training classes afterwards or what?
*Per company policy, the interviewer is allowed to prompt the applicant to breathe only one time.
(I crack myself up... we lost another 79 pilots in Oct and 25 or so by Nov 5. My seniority went up 13 points between Nov 5 and Nov 11. Yiiikesss)
#37
#38
yeh, sim eval is nothing to be afraid of. If you haven't flown one in a while, normally they're pretty cheap to rent out for an hour, and instructors are happy to collect a couple of bucks to sit around and run the stupid thing, failing instruments, and engines is always fun.
Only thing i could see someone worrying about is that they don't fly like airplanes, but...you can get over that if you just fly the thing is good as possible, keeping a good scan, there should be no problem, i used to love flying the old frasca 142...gets you a heck of a good instrument scan when you can't feel anything, it wants to turn in every direction, and every approach is shot right down to minimums and has to end with a missed (no visual)...and an autopilot. what's that?
Another note, when i was going through my recurrent at TSA, i noticed a new slew of computers sitting in the old "interview" room, all having a joystick connected to them....besides surfing the internet, these things all have MS flight simulator installed....and the ERJ model loaded....anyone know if they're ACTUALLY doing evaluations based on MSFS? If so....that's a new ultimate low in cheapness, tackiness, and lack of professionalism.
Only thing i could see someone worrying about is that they don't fly like airplanes, but...you can get over that if you just fly the thing is good as possible, keeping a good scan, there should be no problem, i used to love flying the old frasca 142...gets you a heck of a good instrument scan when you can't feel anything, it wants to turn in every direction, and every approach is shot right down to minimums and has to end with a missed (no visual)...and an autopilot. what's that?
Another note, when i was going through my recurrent at TSA, i noticed a new slew of computers sitting in the old "interview" room, all having a joystick connected to them....besides surfing the internet, these things all have MS flight simulator installed....and the ERJ model loaded....anyone know if they're ACTUALLY doing evaluations based on MSFS? If so....that's a new ultimate low in cheapness, tackiness, and lack of professionalism.
#39
No Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Another note, when i was going through my recurrent at TSA, i noticed a new slew of computers sitting in the old "interview" room, all having a joystick connected to them....besides surfing the internet, these things all have MS flight simulator installed....and the ERJ model loaded....anyone know if they're ACTUALLY doing evaluations based on MSFS? If so....that's a new ultimate low in cheapness, tackiness, and lack of professionalism.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
i dont see the need in taking a sim portion of an interview full motion. The sims rarely fly just like the airplane. The candidate has probably never flown this airplane or anything like it prior to this interview unless he has shelled out some cash. This gives the advantage to well to do individuals or people who need the extra help. I wish it was a level playing field based on who you are, what you have flown, and not who you know or how much you paid for your sim prep.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
UnlimitedAkro
Regional
1
07-11-2007 03:51 PM



