Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

skywest not hiring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2008, 12:28 AM
  #21  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

I'm waiting for Soutwest to call RAH to do flying into Mexico for them on the 170's because it would allow them to expand and yet stay away from the "little plane" mentality they are campaigning against.



**Duck sits waiting for something to nibble on the line then take the bait**
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 03:29 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,803
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
I'm waiting for Soutwest to call RAH to do flying into Mexico for them on the 170's because it would allow them to expand and yet stay away from the "little plane" mentality they are campaigning against.
Now that would be disappointing for us poor SkyWest folk, no?
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:43 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

"**Duck sits waiting for something to nibble on the line then take the bait**"

Mod note:

It would be wise to not make posts of a baiting nature at APC. This site is about free flowing debate of a professional nature. Not "baiting" someone into a flamebait type thead for entertainment value. The mods sometimes have a hard time deciding what to call flamebait. When you make a statement like the quote above, it makes it pretty easy to figure out....
de727ups is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:48 AM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Exclamation

Originally Posted by fatmike69 View Post
Yes, all classes have been cancelled for the near future. Not sure how long it will be, I heard until August. Probably has to do with Delta cutting back alot of flying. In today's day and age of fuel prices, I just don't think the 50 seat RJ is economical to run anymore. I would venture to guess that airplanes like the E170 and 190, maybe even the CRJ900 are going to be the future of regional aircraft.....
I hope not, I hope they would be the future of smaller mainline aircraft.............
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:53 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Polar Bear Food
Posts: 202
Default

Originally Posted by SAABaroowski View Post
I hope not, I hope they would be the future of smaller mainline aircraft.............
Touche. With appropriate pay rates as well.
Danzig is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 09:02 AM
  #26  
Gets Off
 
Bond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: On Top
Posts: 742
Default

Originally Posted by Sbaker1595 View Post
just wait, the CRJ1000 is going to be the new cattle car of the regional airline market......
I respecfully have to disagree with you. Little thing call scope is going to keep those birds out the regional market as it should.

You do realize that the 1000 is a 100 seater and even if you throw a few first class seats you still end up with over 80 seats total...to my knowledge the only airline with scope over 70 seats right now is US airways as grandfathered through America West....
Bond is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 09:08 AM
  #27  
Gets Off
 
Bond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: On Top
Posts: 742
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
I'm waiting for Soutwest to call RAH to do flying into Mexico for them on the 170's because it would allow them to expand and yet stay away from the "little plane" mentality they are campaigning against.

It's not that simple, as you're aware SWA is not a flag carrier, which is the whole reason for getting someone else to do their international flying; well a regional isn't either. We all operate into Mexico under the umbrella of the flag carriers we service.

My money is on ATA doing that flying with 73's as they're established already with SWA. Otherwise it would be a very big investment for any regional to go through that much red tape for a code-share.

Last edited by Bond; 02-18-2008 at 03:03 PM.
Bond is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 09:11 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

Originally Posted by Bond View Post
You do realize that the 1000 is a 100 seater and even if you throw a few first class seats you still end up with over 80 seats total...to my knowledge the only airline with scope over 70 seats right now is US airways as grandfathered through America West....
DAL is 76 seats and MAG is running their CR9's at 86 seats US.

I do hope that scope doesn't loosen anymore than it has now but remember that most everyone had scope restricting reginals to 50 seats half a decade ago and now that has changes. We can't see the future, all we can do is hope that it's in our favor.
JetJock16 is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 09:47 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by Koolaidman View Post
I met Chip Childs when he was flying around our system rallying the troops before the ALPA vote. I asked what was new with SkyWest, any word on the Midwest side, etc. He mentioned that they were trying to get United to do 900's. He didn't say in what seating configuration though.

So I agree with the earlier posts that the 700's and 900's will probably be the aircraft of the future for regionals. At SkyWest we still have 18 700's and 4 900's coming later this year. So I think hiring will pick back up sooner or later.

I can only think of us getting the Midwest 50 seaters and RAH getting the 50 seaters for Continental in the last few years. The 200 is probably going to phased out in the next 5 - 10 years.
I don't think 50 seaters will be going anywhere. They may limit their routes, but they will not disappear. There will still be a need for service to small towns. Yes, turboprops could replace the 50 seat RJ in that capacity, however, it will most likely not happen due to the public. There are still many people who have the "dangerous propeller plane" syndrome. When Airways replaced turboprop routes with jets, the load factor drastically increased. Though we might can never understand it, for some reason the public, for the most part, think jets are safer.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:26 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SharkAir's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76 View Post
Though we might can never understand it, for some reason the public, for the most part, think jets are safer.
Fewer moving parts.
SharkAir is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
DON*T HATE ERAU
Regional
24
01-04-2008 09:16 PM
epilot
Regional
36
04-19-2006 09:44 PM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices