Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

skywest not hiring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2008 | 04:28 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fatmike69
Tough to call....but I would say it probably won't just be limited to Skywest. I think all carriers of the 50 seat RJ are probably going to start feeling the pinch on cutbacks. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think Comair is getting cutbacks on their 200's, as well as Skywest. With age 65, the large pool at Southwest, etc, I would say that hiring at the major levels will affect attrition at the regionals. Combine that with less growth and aircraft cuts at the regional level, I think it will be felt industry wide. However, that said, I think that RAH is in a much better strategic position than most just due to their fleet makeup (E170's, E190's...). While Skywest, ASA, Comair have much more 200's than any other plane, RAH is pretty evenly distributed between the smaller RJ's and the larger ones. Just my opinion though.
Agree with this except I think the E-jet, when the stuff hits the fan, will not be viewed as such a great plane due to higher fuel burn...what do I know though.
Reply
Old 02-17-2008 | 04:30 PM
  #12  
Koolaidman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SKYW CRJ FO
Default

I heard RAH has 190's and is looking for someone to fly them for. Is that true?
Reply
Old 02-17-2008 | 04:41 PM
  #13  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,131
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by flyboyzz1
Agree with this except I think the E-jet, when the stuff hits the fan, will not be viewed as such a great plane due to higher fuel burn...what do I know though.
I think the E-jets will still be popular due to pax comfort, but the CRJ will hold it's own due to fuel efficiency. If it wasn't for the oil spike, the CRJ would be toast.
Reply
Old 02-17-2008 | 07:05 PM
  #14  
paxhauler85's Avatar
*********
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Koolaidman
I heard RAH has 190's and is looking for someone to fly them for. Is that true?
As I understand it, some of their 170 options can be converted to 190's if they so choose.

Someone from RAH would know more than me, but I think they could come as early as the end of this year/beginning of next.
Reply
Old 02-17-2008 | 07:25 PM
  #15  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/sh...ght=boyd+group

As far as staffing goes we are getting better but I'm still thinking we're far from where they'd like to be. So long as I keep seeing two CA's flying the same aircraft we aren't there yet. We very rarely have reservist available by any means.
Reply
Old 02-17-2008 | 07:26 PM
  #16  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by paxhauler85
As I understand it, some of their 170 options can be converted to 190's if they so choose.

Someone from RAH would know more than me, but I think they could come as early as the end of this year/beginning of next.
I've heard RAH secured all the options they could so that they could sell them later. I don't know if that's even possible but it was mentioned. Insight anyone?
Reply
Old 02-17-2008 | 08:07 PM
  #17  
Bond's Avatar
Gets Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: On Top
Default

In my humble opinion the cards are laid out for an industry slow down in hiring....

Age 65
Oil Prices
Mergers and consolidations
Fleet retirements and replacements

Here at XJT we've been hiring into a pool for a while with classes not resuming 'til April (subject to change ofcourse), and the same thing with upgrades...all based on attrition at this point.

Last edited by Bond; 02-17-2008 at 08:13 PM.
Reply
Old 02-17-2008 | 08:53 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flyboyzz1
the E170/90 burn way more fuel the the CRJ700/900 too bad everyone has a woody for em
And the RJ's burn way more fuel (and I mean WAY MORE) than the comparable turboprops yet the majors haven't given serious thought to go back to them. CAL is the only one, with the majority of the majors issuing RFP's for large RJ's.

If fuel burn was their primary concern we'd see a lot more RFP's for TP's on the table IMO like the Colgan Q400 one instead of the numerous -900 RFP's.

The 170's really spanked the CRJ. While my company operates only CRJ's, thankfully they don't have the size of fleet like the "major" regionals do. Personally I see the 170's doing most of the domestic RJ flying in the future.
Reply
Old 02-17-2008 | 10:21 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: left seat regional
Default

Originally Posted by fosters
And the RJ's burn way more fuel (and I mean WAY MORE) than the comparable turboprops yet the majors haven't given serious thought to go back to them. CAL is the only one, with the majority of the majors issuing RFP's for large RJ's.
If fuel burn was their primary concern we'd see a lot more RFP's for TP's on the table IMO like the Colgan Q400 one instead of the numerous -900 RFP's.
Why should it be when management can keep ofsetting those costs by not adjusting contracts with inflation and COLA and/or pay concessions??
Reply
Old 02-17-2008 | 10:45 PM
  #20  
Sbaker1595's Avatar
Gets Paid Vacation
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: King Air 200, PA-31P-350 Mojave, Bellanca 17-30A Super Viking
Default

just wait, the CRJ1000 is going to be the new cattle car of the regional airline market......
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
DON*T HATE ERAU
Regional
24
01-04-2008 09:16 PM
epilot
Regional
36
04-19-2006 09:44 PM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices