Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Tprops in a Jet world

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2008 | 02:02 PM
  #11  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi
Yes. The general public is stupid.
Stupid is right. Give people the option when they book. Have $20 fuel surcharge when they book if the want to fly the 145, that would be funny to see.
Reply
Old 03-19-2008 | 02:16 PM
  #12  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

I for one am headed back to the Prop as CA and I'm excited. It's nice to see the future starting to include these, what some where calling, relics. There efficiency at the regional level is often underrated due to the public’s perception but with the next gens including higher cruising speed and more passenger comfort, I truly believe that they hold an important role in domestic's air travels future. With higher fuel prices mainlines starting to shift more flying into international markets while pulling out of (errrrr neglecting) domestic because of Joe Publics unwillingness to pay higher fuel surcharges, this is the reason why 30-74 PAX T-Props will see a resurgence. If Joe Public wants a $100 ticket then they’ll have to fly on T-props (Emb-120, Saab 340, Q2/3/4's) for their short to short/intermediate hops, larger RJ's (CR7/9, E-170/75) for intermediate, small narrowbodies (E-190/5, C-series, 717, 737, A319/20) for intermediate/long haul, larger narrowbodies (737-800, A321, 757) for long haul/transcontinental domestic with the occasional small widebody (767) for transcontinental.

Regardless, fuel surcharges have to increase..............period.

Last edited by JetJock16; 03-19-2008 at 02:28 PM.
Reply
Old 03-19-2008 | 02:20 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi
Yes. The general public is stupid.
I agree one hundred percent
Reply
Old 03-19-2008 | 02:26 PM
  #14  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi
Yes. The general public is stupid.
Be that as it may, they are the reason you have a paycheck.
Reply
Old 03-19-2008 | 02:31 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Waiting for class to start...
Default

Dash 8 300??? that has 50 seats right? Maybe they are dumping all the money is something better than the q400??!?!?!?
Reply
Old 03-19-2008 | 02:35 PM
  #16  
flynwmn's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Default

You can put I believe 57-60 but doesnt make sense 7-10 more people if fully loaded doesnt work since the whole FA requirement thing.
Reply
Old 03-19-2008 | 02:37 PM
  #17  
MaxRampW8's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: CRJ - FO
Default

Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi
Yes. The general public is stupid.
Didn't an FA say something like that on David Letterman? "The customer is the enemy." That was classic.
Reply
Old 03-19-2008 | 02:37 PM
  #18  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by saabguy493
Dash 8 300??? that has 50 seats right? Maybe they are dumping all the money is something better than the q400??!?!?!?
Expect to see Colgan get started in the Dash 200/300 business.
Reply
Old 03-19-2008 | 03:02 PM
  #19  
Moose Surgeon's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: SAAB 340
Default

Hey stupid question, What is the difference between the dash 100/200. Thanks
Reply
Old 03-19-2008 | 03:08 PM
  #20  
usmc-sgt's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 42
Default

Originally Posted by saabguy493
Dash 8 300??? that has 50 seats right? Maybe they are dumping all the money is something better than the q400??!?!?!?
You havent heard about plans on the drawing board for the Q400X? 90 passengers, they plan on just stretching the fuselage a bit, strengthening the gear and not derating the current engines on the Q400s.

Series 200: Series 100 airframe with more powerful Pratt & Whitney Canada PW123 engines (rated at 2,150 shp or 1,604 kW) for improved performance also capable of carrying 37 to 39 passengers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
jonnyjetprop
Major
16
08-23-2007 05:18 AM
Sir James
Major
5
03-04-2006 03:31 PM
Sasquatch
Cargo
1
12-27-2005 01:20 AM
RockBottom
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 02:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices