Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Tprops in a Jet world

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2008 | 10:21 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Waiting for class to start...
Default

Originally Posted by Moose Surgeon
Hey stupid question, What is the difference between the dash 100/200. Thanks
POWER!!! The 200 has more of it! Oh yeah, and the prop tips are usually painted a different color.
Reply
Old 03-20-2008 | 06:24 AM
  #52  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

I remember one time I was asked questions about the EMB-120 when I was jumpseating home from FAT to PHX (Mesa LOL!). Somehow the question came up about speed and I said the only TPROP that I've been out run by was the Q400 (great bird) and I believe it true’s out around 40 kts faster than the Bro with higher climb rates. I said that the SAAB's, Q1/2/3's and Beeches keep us down on the last day when we fly get home power and we mind going so. Usually, on go home day, we try to stay down below 18K, get them in site, let ATC know that we can maintain visual, set MAX Torque for cruise and wave as we go by. To my knowledge only the DoProp (Do328 prop), Saab 2000 and the Q400 are faster than the Bro.

Somewhere in the middle of the conversation the both pilots chuckled and the CA said:

"That’s like trying to figure out who the fastest retarded kid at the Special Olympics."

Although I admit it was funny and it somewhat makes sense, it just goes to show you what some think of us prop lovers.

Last edited by JetJock16; 03-20-2008 at 06:30 AM.
Reply
Old 03-20-2008 | 06:43 AM
  #53  
Killer51883's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: E-170
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver
Would you mind adding some info to this comment. What did you find more "fun" about an ATR vs. a -145? I have almost zero time in anything with a prop. To me they are both airliners, so I'm just wondering what could make one more of a "real plane" or more "fun" than the other. Not flame bait, I'm genuinely curious.
Thanks.
just like what these guys have said a turbo prop can do things alot easier than a jet in some situations. Now the atr cant get out of its own way above 10000 feet in a climb where a jet can still manage a good 1500 feet a minute plus. However the prop can slow on a dime. the huge props up there are like drag chutes. You can easily go from a clean max speed configuration to a dirty on ref configuration in a matter of seconds.
Reply
Old 03-20-2008 | 06:44 AM
  #54  
saab2000's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
Default

The SAAB2000 is a terrific airplane too. But out of production and a very complex machine, probably unsuited to the abuse it would get here. When I flew them in Switzerland they were pretty maintainance intensive.

The other day I heard a Colgan Q400 on the frequency out east. The controller was asking their speed and then said that it was causing a bit of concern because it was too fast for the lower, normal turboprop altitudes but too slow for the normal jet altitudes. Doesn't really fit in well to the current scheme of how they ran it. That would be a lesser problem in less congested airspace of course.

Fact is though, that out east where I do about 98% of my flying the turborpops would be nicer. We are slowed to 250 so often it makes me sick. Of course, the fuel flow drops way back when at 250 knots at FL290, but it seems to kind of defeat the purpose of flying a jet.

Anyway, seems like most pilots like props, but passengers don't. I always get a kick out of the folks who would rather fly in a 40+ year old NWA DC-9 than a brand spanking new Q400!

Also, the SAAB2000 was WAY better to fly in the gusty, turbulent conditions that are common in the northeast US. Far better speed control coming down the ILS in a 25 knot gusty wind.
Reply
Old 03-20-2008 | 07:39 AM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 254
Likes: 2
Default

The most fun I've had is taking off behind an Air Shuttle Dash 8 and passing them in the climb. Departure usually dishes out some kind of speed restriction in the climb, or tells us to do "best rate" to 230. Unfortunately for them, they don't realize "best rate" for the burrito bomber is 700-1000 fpm for the long haul.
Reply
Old 03-20-2008 | 07:42 AM
  #56  
usmc-sgt's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 42
Default

We have that problem alot as far as speed. Sometimes they will see we are a dash and put us at 16,000 feet or so where we will do almost 370 knots true which is over 100 knots faster than most of the props we run with.

I dont really think it is a problem when we fly in the levels around 200-250 because most jets doing similiar stage lengths seem to be hanging out around the high 2's and low 3's so our speed is just fine out there. Some controllers think we are a slow jet and others dont know what to think, it is taking some getting used to for everyone. We can climb in a hurry though like others have said at IAS of 230-250 we can hold around 1500 FPM up to 250 with full pax and fuel.
Reply
Old 03-20-2008 | 07:43 AM
  #57  
Timmay's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 586
Likes: 19
From: FOD
Default

Burrito bomber...hahaha. I've heard of taco turbine, but burrito bomber's a new one to me.
Reply
Old 03-20-2008 | 09:00 AM
  #58  
btwissel's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: Q400 survivor
Default

Originally Posted by higgi8f6
I figure I will spend the later years in my career flying glass so I might as well create a great foundation on steam gauges.
tel that to the newhires @ NWA that are on the -9, or the american guys on the -80s
Reply
Old 03-20-2008 | 09:25 AM
  #59  
BoredwLife's Avatar
First Rule of Fight Club
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
From: My seat smells like cat pee
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt
We have that problem alot as far as speed. Sometimes they will see we are a dash and put us at 16,000 feet or so where we will do almost 370 knots true which is over 100 knots faster than most of the props we run with.

I dont really think it is a problem when we fly in the levels around 200-250 because most jets doing similiar stage lengths seem to be hanging out around the high 2's and low 3's so our speed is just fine out there. Some controllers think we are a slow jet and others dont know what to think, it is taking some getting used to for everyone. We can climb in a hurry though like others have said at IAS of 230-250 we can hold around 1500 FPM up to 250 with full pax and fuel.

It took LAX a long time to figure out how these things "fly" also. But once they realized that you can do 246kts to about 7 mile final and still configure and land they start to like you. At least on this coast most places have learned the aircrafts abilities and seem to adapt.
Reply
Old 03-20-2008 | 10:48 AM
  #60  
Flies With The Hat On
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,339
Likes: 0
From: Right of the Left Seat
Default

The best thing about props is when you're parking and the rampers are standing four feet from the side of the prop arc proving how bad @#% they are.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
turk
Flight Schools and Training
29
01-13-2012 05:58 AM
jonnyjetprop
Major
16
08-23-2007 05:18 AM
Sir James
Major
5
03-04-2006 03:31 PM
Sasquatch
Cargo
1
12-27-2005 01:20 AM
RockBottom
Cargo
0
07-09-2005 02:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices