Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

The honest future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2008 | 10:58 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
From: Satan's Camaro
Default

Originally Posted by groovinaviator
I never said Pinnacle... are they bottom of the barrel? Interesting.I have quite a few friends from college at TSA and although I don't agree with where they went to work I am by no means better than them. Some have a reason they need to be there, but let's face it most of us (not all) entry level pilots are young and single and could go wherever we wanted. Anyway, My point is that the less money someone is willing to work for the less money we will all make. My company formerly had bases in the midwest, but now we do not and I get paid much less money than I would have because a second rate company that doesn't pay their pilots crap undercut us. I suppose those pay cuts which we had to take to stay afloat helped inch us along in the race to the bottom... Glad we are not winning that race.

How does going to a company like MESA, TSA, and apparently Pinnacle (among others I'm sure) help anyone but yourself. I suppose that in the end everyone is only looking out for #1 anyway.

Same old story... That is part of (dis)honest future.
This has been argued so many times before. There is nothing new from either side to be said.

Didn't mean to sound arrogant... I by no means think i am better than anyone else. I however do think I did my part (through research) to get a job that wasn't screwing over other entry level pilots... although it could be argued I am screwing the guys at the majors... the argument could go on forever.


And no... I don't plan on being at AWAC forever, but i do no if there is another down turn in hiring I will have made the right decision. By the way... don't get caught up on upgrade times. They can (and do) change overnight.
Many would argue that you, by not going through the military, took a job that was screwing over way more pilots than the 2000 pilots that have gone to these bottom of the barrel airlines have.

Get off your high horse and realize that most of the guys at majors laugh at most of the bickering that goes on at the regional level. It's a REGIONAL. ALL of your work rules suck, regardless of whether you have a duty rig or not. Somebody took a job, and that's brining down the industry? Give me a break. Entry level aviation jobs have been crappy for almost the entire tenure of the industry, it's just that there aren't 100 different little carriers that fly around Metroliners and J31s anymore, there are 25 that fly slightly larger aircraft. If I may, I'd like to offer you a tip: the fact that there's so much in fighting at the regional level is half of the problem in aviation right now. Who cares that you as an FO are getting $30k as opposed to $20k? You're still accepting a job that works you almost as hard as a real job for what essentially works out to be around $10-$15 an hour (if you spread it out over the hours that you actually work. I can't remember who said it, but the majors are the goal here, people. The quote was "if he gets to the majors before you, he wins, you lose. Period."
Reply
Old 03-24-2008 | 10:59 AM
  #22  
Pokerpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: EMB145 FO
Default

Originally Posted by groovinaviator
I could even see them hiring foreigners when the wage gets too low for even the bottom of the barrel guys (MESA and TSA types) to accept.

I hope for the best though. I love my job (when the door is closed).
Too bad most foreign Airlines are doing alot better, so it will be hard to get people to come over to fly here. That been said Mesa, Trans States, PSA, Pinnacle, Great Lakes, CommutAir, Colgan, America Eagle, Comair, ASA and Lynx will all go out of business. Leaving SkyWest, ExpressJet and AWAC for that matter, to be the WORLD GREATEST and you guys will change the economy and reform the aviation industry. Ha ha ha Good Luck
Reply
Old 03-24-2008 | 11:10 AM
  #23  
groovinaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: CL65 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pokerpilot
...Leaving SkyWest, ExpressJet and AWAC for that matter, to be the WORLD GREATEST and you guys will change the economy and reform the aviation industry. Ha ha ha Good Luck
Haha... for some reason I don't have much faith in that.
Reply
Old 03-24-2008 | 12:00 PM
  #24  
kansas's Avatar
Swearing at the FMA
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 902
Likes: 0
From: MD-88 FO
Default

Originally Posted by groovinaviator
This is nothing new. If this were truly a customer service industry and not a "please the shareholder" industry it would be better for labor, management and most importantly the customer.

Read the book "Hard Landing"

http://www.amazon.com/Hard-Landing-C.../dp/0812928350
I agree with you to an extent, but what business isn't about "please the shareholder?" Even if you work for Southwest and have a central mission of pleasing employees/custormers, the mission is to make money.

"Hard Landing" should be required reading for all in this industry.
Reply
Old 03-24-2008 | 12:59 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by boilerpilot
Many would argue that you, by not going through the military, took a job that was screwing over way more pilots than the 2000 pilots that have gone to these bottom of the barrel airlines have.

Get off your high horse and realize that most of the guys at majors laugh at most of the bickering that goes on at the regional level. It's a REGIONAL. ALL of your work rules suck, regardless of whether you have a duty rig or not. Somebody took a job, and that's brining down the industry? Give me a break. Entry level aviation jobs have been crappy for almost the entire tenure of the industry, it's just that there aren't 100 different little carriers that fly around Metroliners and J31s anymore, there are 25 that fly slightly larger aircraft. If I may, I'd like to offer you a tip: the fact that there's so much in fighting at the regional level is half of the problem in aviation right now. Who cares that you as an FO are getting $30k as opposed to $20k? You're still accepting a job that works you almost as hard as a real job for what essentially works out to be around $10-$15 an hour (if you spread it out over the hours that you actually work. I can't remember who said it, but the majors are the goal here, people. The quote was "if he gets to the majors before you, he wins, you lose. Period."
Best post I've read in a LONG time.
Reply
Old 03-24-2008 | 02:23 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Default

the 64K question - when ticket prices go up because costs rise, will the aircraft get larger with less frequency or smaller with the same or lower freq.
It still costs less to send 45 people on an RJ than on an MD80 or the like.
Reply
Old 03-24-2008 | 02:33 PM
  #27  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by mwa1
the 64K question - when ticket prices go up because costs rise, will the aircraft get larger with less frequency or smaller with the same or lower freq.
It still costs less to send 45 people on an RJ than on an MD80 or the like.
I think the trend will be to fly the fuel efficient newer 100 to 110 seat jets at fewer frequencies, if the oil price keeps going up, which I think it will.
This means 50 seat RJs will be gradually phased out. Even 76 seat RJs including CRJ9s and E175s will be phased out eventually to be replaced with 110 or larger mainline jets. Unless the scope clause disappears(very unlikely) these jets will be flown by majors.
Reply
Old 03-24-2008 | 02:48 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Default

I think you are right about the "distant" future but there are not enough of these to put into the system now. the baby bus (318) would work well and I think it is the only one that could be produced with current production line openings
Reply
Old 03-24-2008 | 02:50 PM
  #29  
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: G550 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by mwa1
I think you are right about the "distant" future but there are not enough of these to put into the system now. the baby bus (318) would work well and I think it is the only one that could be produced with current production line openings
You left out the E195s and Bombardier C-Series.
Reply
Old 03-24-2008 | 03:00 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Default

what I meant was that the 195 orders have that line filled and of course the C- series still awaits a launch customer. in other words it will be a few years till it all goes down.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sharksrock
Hangar Talk
8
01-27-2008 10:49 AM
grant123
Major
12
09-04-2007 09:23 AM
maximaman
Regional
31
09-03-2007 05:38 AM
grasshopper
Major
12
09-02-2007 05:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices