Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PHX flying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2008 | 12:37 PM
  #11  
G2TT's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Looking Forward
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
Hmmmmmmm.......ya? That's makes no sense.
Colgan, TSA, CHQ, Republic, PSA, PDT, AWAC, MESA...did I forget anyone? I don't think they need any more regional carriers, I think they would try and fill Mesa's hole with carriers they already have.

There is no shortage of groups to whipsaw, especially with two separate wholly owed carriers.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 12:41 PM
  #12  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by G2TT
Colgan, TSA, CHQ, Republic, PSA, PDT, AWAC, MESA...did I forget anyone? I don't think they need any more regional carriers, I think they would try and fill Mesa's hole with carriers they already have.

There is no shortage of groups to whipsaw, especially with two separate wholly owed carriers.
The number of carriers is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 12:42 PM
  #13  
groovinaviator's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: CL65 Captain
Default

Whoever takes the lead in the race to the bottom after MAG folds would get the flying. TSA... Pinnacle... Colgan...? Who wants it guys... how cheap will you work for that "quick" upgrade?

it would be nice if something like that went to AWAC... a change from the East Coast scenery would be nice.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 12:48 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,847
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by groovinaviator
Whoever takes the lead in the race to the bottom after MAG folds would get the flying. TSA... Pinnacle... Colgan...? Who wants it guys... how cheap will you work for that "quick" upgrade?

it would be nice if something like that went to AWAC... a change from the East Coast scenery would be nice.
I tired of the East coast 121 flying in about 6 weeks...
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 12:51 PM
  #15  
BoredwLife's Avatar
First Rule of Fight Club
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
From: My seat smells like cat pee
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
Hey, who knows, best of luck to you guys.

I'm head back to the Bro where I will be bidding and hopefully holding the best 121 flying in the NATION! That's PDX and SEA. IMO and I've been based in FAT, DEN, SLC, TUS and ATL; PDX flying is the best, bar none!

I love flying up here and living up here. Would only leave for a gig on a island. Or the ability to commte to an island. It does rain A LOT though.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 12:57 PM
  #16  
G2TT's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Looking Forward
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
The number of carriers is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.
Hey, I'm just voicing my opinion. It's really more of what I would want to happen than what I think will happen. If I want to dream of PDT and AWAC getting more airways flying instead of Skywest, well I don't think I'm alone. The number of carriers is not irrelevant to me, if they add another new carrier to replace Mesa, that just means the companies already working for airways didn't get the flying, and that I disagree with (which really doesn't matter, because they aren't going to ask either of us what we think about it).
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 01:04 PM
  #17  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by G2TT
Hey, I'm just voicing my opinion. It's really more of what I would want to happen than what I think will happen. If I want to dream of PDT and AWAC getting more airways flying instead of Skywest, well I don't think I'm alone. The number of carriers is not irrelevant to me, if they add another new carrier to replace Mesa, that just means the companies already working for airways didn't get the flying, and that I disagree with (which really doesn't matter, because they aren't going to ask either of us what we think about it).
True, we just fly an airplane, we have no influence.

BTW, I'm OK with anyone getting the flying as long as Orenstein gets the boot and is hopefully permanently banned from operating another carrier.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 01:12 PM
  #18  
G2TT's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Looking Forward
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
I'm OK with anyone getting the flying as long as Orenstein gets the boot and is hopefully permanently banned from operating another carrier.
Now we're talking
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 02:24 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,847
Likes: 10
Default

Yes...the very best outcome of this debacle would be that JO never be free to destroy an Airline again.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 04:00 PM
  #20  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,131
Likes: 797
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
True, we just fly an airplane, we have no influence.

BTW, I'm OK with anyone getting the flying as long as Orenstein gets the boot and is hopefully permanently banned from operating another carrier.
I think he is pretty much persona-non-grata in the mainstream airline industry...you won't see him at a big-name carrier. But I wouldn't rule out some start-up...he was buddies with Branson at one point.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JayDee
Hangar Talk
3
01-14-2008 12:24 PM
Planespotta
Hangar Talk
27
01-04-2008 09:35 AM
AAflyer
Major
45
12-29-2007 08:39 AM
vagabond
Technical
2
12-24-2007 07:56 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices