Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Skywest tries to buy Expressjet....Rejected >

Skywest tries to buy Expressjet....Rejected

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Skywest tries to buy Expressjet....Rejected

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2008 | 11:02 AM
  #41  
Bond's Avatar
Gets Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: On Top
Default

Anyone interested please see the thread that SAAB just posted, as it turns out skywest has CAL's blessing on this. Here we go. Good thing our pay and benefits (non-travel) stay intact.
Reply
Old 04-25-2008 | 11:22 AM
  #42  
Dash8Pilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Dreamniner
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
Man, some of you guys just can't see the forest from the trees! They have the final say, and have to approve any potential buy out/merger etc.

Unless, skywest is willing to operate the Coex side at a potential loss, the rates we're giving CAL cannot get any cheaper, not to metion the fact that CAL already expressed interest in reducing it's regional jet feed...oh and did I forget scope?
I can see it just fine. Continental only cares that the flights get done, with reasonable performance. I understand they have the final say, my point was that they don't have a compelling reason to stop SKW from purchasing XJT.

Further, SKW will easily be able to fly cheaper than XJT for Continental. The current deal between XJT and CAL pays XJT around 10% margins. If SKW is willing to accept 7% that would have save CAL somewhere in the ballpark of $9,000,000 per quarter.

Edit: Just saw the other thread on SKW already having approval from Continental for the deal. I guess it points to SKW being willing to accept lower margins than XJT.
Reply
Old 04-25-2008 | 11:53 AM
  #43  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 801
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
Who says xjt would be operating those flights?
Mainline CAL scope would not allow SKW (with 90 seaters) to do CAL flying, IIRC. Makes sense to keep it with XJET.

Us Air scope allows 900's, so SKW will probably be busy with ex-mesa flying.
Reply
Old 04-25-2008 | 11:55 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Mainline CAL scope would not allow SKW (with 90 seaters) to do CAL flying, IIRC. Makes sense to keep it with XJET.
Yep, but there would NOTHING stopping them from reallocating 50 seat aircraft. In other words, put their CRJ's on COEX routes, pull EMB's from COEX and put them in UAX/DelCon routes.

And don't forget, there are probably WAY more things in play here that we don't know about. Like a relaxation of scope for one. Not saying it's gonna happen, but still. We're just the pilots, we don't have access to all that's going on behind the scenes.
Reply
Old 04-25-2008 | 12:30 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
From: ERJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by Bond
What are you going to use? A CRJ200 from IAH to YYZ
We all know that ain't gonna work
Reply
Old 04-25-2008 | 12:53 PM
  #46  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by tpersuit
Nice try Skywest management. Might need to up it to around $10-$15 to make it work. We have at least $500 million in assets. Don't think the shareholders are that stupid to sell all that for $200 million. Glad our management stuck to its guns again. All this shows me is that ExpressJet is a very good company.

Stock just jumped 30%. Man I love our management. I guess I should thank Skywest management because their offer shows how undervalued our stock is right now and it shot up. Should get interesting.
You do realize that whenever a buyout is attempted the stock price always takes a jump, many reasons contribute to this. One of the most important ones is that the per share buyout price is usually more than its current market value which is an attempt to sway their current investors. This causes outside investors try to jump on the wagon hoping to make a quick profit. Thus driving the stock price up causing the buying party to submit a second offer which contibutes to the investors earning even more money. XJT’s jump in stock price has very little to do in XJT’s value and quite a bit to do with investors attempts at making a quick buck. I promise you that if & when SKW backs out you’ll see XJT’s stock price begin to settle as investors start selling because the buyout no longer brings the promise of larger profits. None the less those who jumped on the wagon will be very happy with their handsome profits from the stock jump alone.

BTW, Midwest experienced the same jump and remember that in the end, after several counters, they ended up being sold.

Also, the $3.50 per share was a low ball offer seeing you never bid high on the first attempt. This holds true in life in general.

As for XJT’s flying, I guarantee you that if SKW purchases XJT, you guys will retain the flying and SKW will use the 75 EMB options to gain another code share. Not to worry, SKW will do their very best retain all of XJT's employees, just look at West Air & ASA as examples.

Best of luck and I'd rather you guys stay independent but the second best option would be for SKW to buy you.

Last edited by JetJock16; 04-25-2008 at 01:09 PM.
Reply
Old 04-25-2008 | 01:01 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 FO
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
As for XJT’s flying, I guarantee you that if SKW purchases XJT, you guys will retain the flying and SKW will use the 75 EMB options to gain another code share. Not to worry, SKW will do their very best retain all of XJT employees.

Let's hope so.
Reply
Old 04-25-2008 | 01:28 PM
  #48  
KiloAlpha's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 0
From: AA A320
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Mainline CAL scope would not allow SKW (with 90 seaters) to do CAL flying, IIRC.
Do you think CAL will try to leverage scope relaxation negations with the treat of a merger?

E.G. "We need larger RJ's or we'll be forced to merge."
Reply
Old 04-25-2008 | 01:30 PM
  #49  
KiloAlpha's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,624
Likes: 0
From: AA A320
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
SKW will use the 75 EMB options to gain another code share.
Not likely unless you are talking about 190s, what airline wants more 50 seaters?
Reply
Old 04-25-2008 | 01:50 PM
  #50  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
Not likely unless you are talking about 190s, what airline wants more 50 seaters?

Of course I don't mean 50 seaters, can those options be converted into 170/75/90/95's? If so then that's what they'll be looking to do. SKW doesn't want more 50 seaters and if they do they can get them really cheap on the open market.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
Deez340
Regional
160
05-06-2008 09:41 PM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
9
05-27-2006 06:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices