Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Skywest tries to buy Expressjet....Rejected >

Skywest tries to buy Expressjet....Rejected

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Skywest tries to buy Expressjet....Rejected

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2008 | 05:14 PM
  #51  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,144
Likes: 801
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
Do you think CAL will try to leverage scope relaxation negations with the treat of a merger?

E.G. "We need larger RJ's or we'll be forced to merge."
Maybe, but CAL cannot possibly guarantee it's pilots that there will not be a merger if they allow larger RJ's...those two issues are in different leagues. Neither can CAL promise that their pilots groups will get preferential consideration at integration time...the OTHER company amd pilot group, and that new federal law would take issue with that.

Besides, mergers do not have to be mutually agreed upon...ie hostile takeover.
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 12:32 AM
  #52  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
I don't know about that, you can expect branded to be dumped asap followed by the delta pro-rate with jets deal, as both are the reason xjt is bleeding so much cash. They would probably get rid of about 40 airplanes when all is said and done and you know what that means.
XJT operates 31 aircraft in Branded, 14 in the DAL pro-rate, and 10 aircraft in the DAL CPA.

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
Who says xjt would be operating those flights?
The XJT's scope clause.
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 05:01 AM
  #53  
blastoff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
Not likely unless you are talking about 190s, what airline wants more 50 seaters?
Embraer has already told XJT that they would prefer not re-starting the 145, and would rather XJT convert those options to the E-Jet line.
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 06:10 AM
  #54  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by blastoff
Embraer has already told XJT that they would prefer not re-starting the 145, and would rather XJT convert those options to the E-Jet line.

However, they're still obligated to whether they like it or not. But that's what I heard when I was still around as well.
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 06:52 AM
  #55  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
The XJT's scope clause.
JA has said the deal WILL NOT happen while that clause is in place.
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 06:55 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Default

do you have a source?
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 07:00 AM
  #57  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dba74
do you have a source?
From the letter he said this

This proposal is also conditioned upon ExpressJet obtaining a clarification and/or amendment, satisfactory to us, to the collective bargaining agreement (the “CBA”) between ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. and the pilots in the service of ExpressJet Airlines, as represented by the Air Line Pilots Association, International (“ALPA”), dated December 1, 2004. First, we need clarification that nothing in the CBA (including, but not limited to, Section 1.D.3) would obligate us to merge the operations of ExpressJet Airlines with those of any or all of our currently-owned airline subsidiaries, or any airline subsidiaries we may acquire in the future, or otherwise apply to us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates (other than ExpressJet and its subsidiaries). Secondly, we need the agreement of ALPA that the certain undated letter among ExpressJet, XJT Holdings, Inc., ALPA and the ExpressJet MEC, appended as pages 223 through 226 of the CBA, shall be revoked and deemed null and void, prior to the conclusion of the acquisition.
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 07:27 AM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 12
From: Maddog FO
Default

That is what XJT is worried about. We don't want Skywest to use OUR XR options that are convertible to E-Jets and purchase them for the Skywest pilot to fly. I'm not worried about our pay and work rules being tampered with. I'm worried that any and all new flying will always go to the Skywest certificate. Any ASA guys want to chime in? How did it work you ya'll were bought?
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 07:30 AM
  #59  
Slaphappy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Roper92
That is what XJT is worried about. We don't want Skywest to use OUR XR options that are convertible to E-Jets and purchase them for the Skywest pilot to fly. I'm not worried about our pay and work rules being tampered with. I'm worried that any and all new flying will always go to the Skywest certificate. Any ASA guys want to chime in? How did it work you ya'll were bought?
They won't be your XR orders once you are owned by Skywest, this was the same case with ASA.

That is correct, its been the case that skywest airlines is the only one that is positioned for growth due to our competative costs. I am also sure it will be the case for all future flying. However asa has grown by at least 10 airlplanes in the past 3 years.

But at this point xjt pilots should just be more worried about keeping their jobs and not wanting to grow their airline.
Reply
Old 04-28-2008 | 07:30 AM
  #60  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Originally Posted by Roper92
That is what XJT is worried about. We don't want Skywest to use OUR XR options that are convertible to E-Jets and purchase them for the Skywest pilot to fly. I'm not worried about our pay and work rules being tampered with. I'm worried that any and all new flying will always go to the Skywest certificate. Any ASA guys want to chime in? How did it work you ya'll were bought?
this is what would happen.........if anyone would get new flying, it would be the non-union Skywest guys. Think about if we at XJT bought someone and their was new flying to be had, you can bet we would want the new flying, not the people we bought
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
Deez340
Regional
160
05-06-2008 09:41 PM
Tech Maven
Money Talk
9
05-27-2006 06:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices