![]() |
Originally Posted by dojetdriver
(Post 387793)
Point I was making is this; As we've seen in a post 9/11/high oil price world, EVERYTHING is subject to renegotiation.
Why bother renegotiating at all when you can go CH11 and just rewrite the whole contract - rules, payscale, fleet size, etc... ... |
Isn't this RFP based upon United cncl MESA's contract? Or Mesa going under?
Also, with the recent news of oil hitting $135 wouldn't UAL think about just not replacing this flying if MESA were to go CHP11. |
I suspect some lift they could pare out... but the fact of the matter is domestic lift is still needed to feed the international routes. On a recent UAX flight from ATL to IAD we had a full boat ( 70 ) ... with 65 international connections.......
interesting times. |
Originally Posted by JetJock16
(Post 388221)
Sources? Last time I looked at a breakdown of airlines operating cost per seat per mile, RAH was not 21% lower than SKW. The fact is that SKW has one of THE lowest debt to asset ratios in the industry and it's far lower than RAH's. Not to mention lower managerial cost, greater buying power, etc.
Look, this isn’t a ****ing match about whose airline is better so don't start that BS. It's about your above #'s which are a little ............... errrrrrrrrrr a lot ............ over the top so just show your sources and if they pan out then great but don't expect anyone on here to just take your word for it? :rolleyes: You can find the price per ASM in their quarterly reports. Skywest operating cost at $.097 http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/...____LAW517.htm RAH at $.076 http://seekingalpha.com/article/7473...t?source=yahoo *Note that I stated these were the points at which they break even. These are their operating costs. However the importance of these numbers is that the company can pass these savings on to the customer. Obviously these numbers fluctuate over time and the goal of the company is to make money so their rates are higher. However if someone thinks the 170/175 is a bad aircraft that the others don't want simply based on a few different pounds in the fuel burn, which it seems to be what everyone here has been saying, then they need to think again. The cost per departure difference could be more than enough to offset the cost of the extra fuel. I don't know what all makes the operating cost at RAH so much cheaper but I'm sure the aircraft have something to do with it. The EMBs don't have near the MX requirements of the CRJs which is an additional cost the company has to swallow. |
Put all the charts you want up there, all the numbers you want. There is a lot more involved in cost than gas, seat miles, pay rates, etc. You guys need to get a life, if someone is awarded the flying, United will let everyone know. You armchair quarterbacks sitting here working the numbers and trying to show how smart you are look like a bunch of idiots.
Pulling numbers from an annual report? Give me a break. You guys look like Lee Corso talking about this years Ohio State team and comparing them with last years starting roster/schedule. Make sense? I heard the lav of a E-170 carries 2 gallons more $hit than the lav of a CRJ-700, don't forget to take that into consideration when your planning your fuel burn analaysys. |
Originally Posted by captchris
(Post 388562)
Put all the charts you want up there, all the numbers you want. There is a lot more involved in cost than gas, seat miles, pay rates, etc. You guys need to get a life, if someone is awarded the flying, United will let everyone know. You armchair quarterbacks sitting here working the numbers and trying to show how smart you are look like a bunch of idiots.
Pulling numbers from an annual report? Give me a break. You guys look like Lee Corso talking about this years Ohio State team and comparing them with last years starting roster/schedule. Make sense? I heard the lav of a E-170 carries 2 gallons more $hit than the lav of a CRJ-700, don't forget to take that into consideration when your planning your fuel burn analaysys. |
Originally Posted by IADBLRJ41
(Post 388429)
Isn't this RFP based upon United cncl MESA's contract? Or Mesa going under?
Originally Posted by captchris
(Post 388562)
I heard the lav of a E-170 carries 2 gallons more $hit than the lav of a CRJ-700, don't forget to take that into consideration when your planning your fuel burn analaysys. |
Just resurrecting this thread to see if anyone knows when a decision is expected to be made about this rfp....
|
From what I've been able to sqeeze out of a friend at UA, the RFP is on hold due to the fuel prices.
|
One of our Domicile Mgrs....says its on hold until Delta settles with mesa in court...than drops them. According to him....when Delta drops them entirely...UA will follow suit....at which point the RFP will be decided.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:22 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands