why is SKYW interested in XJT at all?
#21
Banned
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 698
I love the term "whipsaw." Is that a real term used in business?
Hey all, SkyWest pilots, being non-union, have little to do with our total cost structure. We do, though, have a lot to offer in regard to our top notch product we give our major contractors. It's just business. We can do it for less, so contracts get sent our way.
Also, I'd actually like to compare W-2s at the end of the year and see how well other regional pilots compare to SkyWest pilots. I'd bet not as well if you were to compare apples to apples, JMHO.
Hey all, SkyWest pilots, being non-union, have little to do with our total cost structure. We do, though, have a lot to offer in regard to our top notch product we give our major contractors. It's just business. We can do it for less, so contracts get sent our way.
Also, I'd actually like to compare W-2s at the end of the year and see how well other regional pilots compare to SkyWest pilots. I'd bet not as well if you were to compare apples to apples, JMHO.
#22
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
I love the term "whipsaw." Is that a real term used in business?
Hey all, SkyWest pilots, being non-union, have little to do with our total cost structure. We do, though, have a lot to offer in regard to our top notch product we give our major contractors. It's just business. We can do it for less, so contracts get sent our way.
Also, I'd actually like to compare W-2s at the end of the year and see how well other regional pilots compare to SkyWest pilots. I'd bet not as well if you were to compare apples to apples, JMHO.
Hey all, SkyWest pilots, being non-union, have little to do with our total cost structure. We do, though, have a lot to offer in regard to our top notch product we give our major contractors. It's just business. We can do it for less, so contracts get sent our way.
Also, I'd actually like to compare W-2s at the end of the year and see how well other regional pilots compare to SkyWest pilots. I'd bet not as well if you were to compare apples to apples, JMHO.
As for W2s, its not that hard to find out. Its called Form 41. XJT's pilot cost per block hour for the last four reported quarters is only slightly higher than Skw's. Of course this includes more than just W2 income. It includes benefits as well so I guess it really doesn't answer your question. Also, you must consider that XJT only operates 50 and 37 seaters and thus doesn't have the higher pay rates Skw has for its larger aircraft. Its all in the DOT website.
#23
Whipsaw is union term, bring multiple labor groups against eachother under the same holding company is "whipsawing." Its used extensively in "Flying the Line" the definitive history of YOUR profession. If its not in your vocabulary, it opens to question your knowledge of aviation history.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Maddog FO
Posts: 651
XJT has a fabulous product! If you don't believe, come jumpseat on us. However, contracts are not sent our way. Oh, we are also held back from having CPA's bigger than 10 aircraft thanks to CAL. CAL doesn't want us to fly for them, or anyone else for that matter! How afwul..
#26
ANSWERING "doug_or"
they would be bound by the pilot's scope clausul paying 1.80 per share or 3.50 like the SKYW offer. The stocks is what they offered 3.50 for and buying most of them would be buying the company. The only way of buying XJET at the moment is buying a mayor % of the stocks.
I do not understand what you mean by saying
Quote "SKW doesn't want to just buy the stock because they would be bound by the XJT pilot's scope clause" End Quote
How would they buy XJT and avoid the pilo't scope clause? I don't believe that is possible so that option does not exist.......and.....what else would you buy than the stock of the company? The stocks or shares are or represent the entire company (each share a small part) and you cannot "just" buy the stocks or not like if they would just be a part of something and there would be some other part to buy not represented by stocks.....If you buy all the stocks you own 100% of XJT if you buy 51% you control XJT and would be the biggest stock owner. That is about 28M shares/stocks.
they would be bound by the pilot's scope clausul paying 1.80 per share or 3.50 like the SKYW offer. The stocks is what they offered 3.50 for and buying most of them would be buying the company. The only way of buying XJET at the moment is buying a mayor % of the stocks.
I do not understand what you mean by saying
Quote "SKW doesn't want to just buy the stock because they would be bound by the XJT pilot's scope clause" End Quote
How would they buy XJT and avoid the pilo't scope clause? I don't believe that is possible so that option does not exist.......and.....what else would you buy than the stock of the company? The stocks or shares are or represent the entire company (each share a small part) and you cannot "just" buy the stocks or not like if they would just be a part of something and there would be some other part to buy not represented by stocks.....If you buy all the stocks you own 100% of XJT if you buy 51% you control XJT and would be the biggest stock owner. That is about 28M shares/stocks.
Last edited by HermannGraf; 05-23-2008 at 02:43 PM.
#27
More than money
I think you are right here..........seems like the CAL move is more than money. There is a strategic move here and if I remmember right CAL was very pleased with SKYW Houston operation while it lasted. Colgan and others underbid SKYW Houston operation for CAL and SKYW had to move out of there but CAL was not pleased with the performance that the ones that took over showed...........
#28
Banned
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 698
ANSWERING "doug_or"
they would be bound by the pilot's scope clausul paying 1.80 per share or 3.50 like the SKYW offer. The stocks is what they offered 3.50 for and buying most of them would be buying the company. The only way of buying XJET at the moment is buying a mayor % of the stocks.
I do not understand what you mean by saying "SKW doesn't want to just buy the stock because they would be bound by the XJT pilot's scope clause"
How would they buy XJT and avoid the pilo't scope clause? I don't believe that is possible so that option does not exist.......and.....what else would you buy than the stock of the company? The stocks or shares are or represent the entire company (each share a small part) and you cannot "just" buy the stocks or not like if they would just be a part of something and there would be some other part to buy not represented by stocks.....If you buy all the stocks you own 100% of XJT if you buy 51% you control XJT and would be the biggest stock owner. That is about 28M shares/stocks.
they would be bound by the pilot's scope clausul paying 1.80 per share or 3.50 like the SKYW offer. The stocks is what they offered 3.50 for and buying most of them would be buying the company. The only way of buying XJET at the moment is buying a mayor % of the stocks.
I do not understand what you mean by saying "SKW doesn't want to just buy the stock because they would be bound by the XJT pilot's scope clause"
How would they buy XJT and avoid the pilo't scope clause? I don't believe that is possible so that option does not exist.......and.....what else would you buy than the stock of the company? The stocks or shares are or represent the entire company (each share a small part) and you cannot "just" buy the stocks or not like if they would just be a part of something and there would be some other part to buy not represented by stocks.....If you buy all the stocks you own 100% of XJT if you buy 51% you control XJT and would be the biggest stock owner. That is about 28M shares/stocks.
Buying stock does not get around our scope.
#29
Whipsaw is union term, bring multiple labor groups against eachother under the same holding company is "whipsawing." Its used extensively in "Flying the Line" the definitive history of YOUR profession. If its not in your vocabulary, it opens to question your knowledge of aviation history.
Union or not, we're all in this struggle together. Unions are historically bad for business, which equals historically bad for employees. The only good part of union membership is work rule protection. I'm not completely convinced SkyWest doesn't need a union, but I think one here would do more harm than good at this stage of the game.
As for "Flying the Line," one book doesn't have all the answers. I've read it, along with many others and don't see the significance of its use of "whipsawing." I'd rather call it competitiveness--something we all should strive for.
#30
yes but...........
It would be much easier to just buy XJT since they already have all the pilots, bases, training programs/facilities for their flying. Also it would give SKYW a HUGE amount of control over the entire regional airline market as a whole. Im sure SKYW is positioning for the future if/when scope is relaxed and CAL RFPs for 70+ seaters are up for bid.
XJT has more money in the bank than what the market value is and maybe the combination of being able to buy XJT "for free" (as the money they have in the bank would go to the new owner) and at the same time gain the assets that would interest SKYW is what made SKYW show interest. Not to forget that SKYW is one of few that has the financial ability to make any offer to anyone out there these days..........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post