Originally Posted by BlueMoon
(Post 458088)
You must have been kinda fast over the threshold then...You could weld the reversers shut on the CRJ (all models)....and they don't get that hot. Certainly not on an 8500' long runway, which SAT has.
|
I put a 172 down on that bad boy!
|
Originally Posted by RickJames
(Post 458100)
Technically, reversers shouldn't matter. Demonstrated (certified) landing distance is based on no reverse thrust.
|
Geez...you must have had plenty room on that approach. 8500ft... Thats plenty room... Land.... rotate- lift off.. flare and land again...in a 172.
|
Originally Posted by WeaselBoy
(Post 458117)
Since we are going with blind speculation...
My guess is that after touchdown a pack of chupacabras ran out onto the runway. The FO, knowing how rare and special these creatures are, decided the ecologically sound thing was to sacrifice the plane and passengers safety to protect them. |
Regional jet? From LAX to SAT?? <insert sarcasm here>
|
If on a short runway like the one that is left open at SAT...with normal braking on the CRJ-200 the pnuematic reversers barely have time to open by the time you hit 80 knots anyways. They have to be the slowest opening reversers on any plane out there.
edit: last time I was there (a month or so ago?) it was a pretty short runway that was still open... 8500 certainly isn't very short. Blame a mechanical issue or a roving group of mexican immigrants in that case. |
holy thread revival
|
Since nobody else has said it, I will.
Just glad everybody walked away. |
Originally Posted by Purpleanga
(Post 622480)
holy thread revival
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:41 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands