Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Cape Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2009 | 10:42 AM
  #21  
johnnysnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: BEECH 1900 PIC
Default

Beat me to it.
Reply
Old 02-26-2009 | 10:46 AM
  #22  
NightIP's Avatar
Tuk er jerbs!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: B747 Left
Default

Originally Posted by johnnysnow
Beat me to it.
I saw your response before you edited it and I thought you explained it better than me anyway.

Last edited by NightIP; 02-26-2009 at 10:50 AM. Reason: grammatik
Reply
Old 02-26-2009 | 11:52 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

The way I saw it was that an SIC could be used in lieu of an autopilot. So I logged SIC on legs with passengers on board. On pt 91 repo legs that I was PF, I logged PIC.

Regardless of how to log the time, it was one of the best learning experiences I've had so far in my four years of flying. Once I reach ATP mins, that accrued experience is what's going to count the most.
Reply
Old 02-26-2009 | 01:42 PM
  #24  
RU4692's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Professional Monkey Trainer
Default

I saw an advertisement on Climbto350 for pilot positions in the BWI area? Is there any truth to this, or is this just CLT350 recycling their posts.
Reply
Old 02-26-2009 | 05:22 PM
  #25  
NightIP's Avatar
Tuk er jerbs!
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: B747 Left
Default

Originally Posted by RU4692
I saw an advertisement on Climbto350 for pilot positions in the BWI area? Is there any truth to this, or is this just CLT350 recycling their posts.
So far all of the BWI flying is crewed with pilots already on property. There isn't currently a BWI crew base; the pilots are based in Lancaster, PA (LNS), and Hagerstown, MD (HGR). I don't think any of us could rule out a BWI base completely (anything could happen), but right now the lines are built out of the outstations.
Reply
Old 02-26-2009 | 05:36 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Captain part 135
Default

Here you see a difference between 9K and other airlines. Most airlines have pilots on furlough. Cape Air fills their aircraft with paid crewmembers that 98% of the time are not required.
Reply
Old 02-27-2009 | 05:50 PM
  #27  
robthree's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: 777, sofa
Default

Originally Posted by NinerKilo
The way I saw it was that an SIC could be used in lieu of an autopilot.

Its just the opposite. An SIC is a required crewmember. An autopilot may be used in lieu of the required crewmember.
Reply
Old 02-28-2009 | 11:36 AM
  #28  
trafly's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NightIP
Yes, Cape Air is a commuter operation as defined by Part 119, operating under Part 135. Part 135.243 should clear it up:

Sec. 135.243 - Pilot in command qualifications.

(a) No certificate holder may use a person, nor may any person serve, as pilot in command in passenger-carrying operations --

(1) Of a turbojet airplane, of an airplane having a passenger-seat configuration, excluding each crewmember seat, of 10 seats or more, or of a multiengine airplane in a commuter operation as defined in part 119 of this chapter, unless that person holds an airline transport pilot certificate with appropriate category and class ratings and, if required, an appropriate type rating for that airplane.




I actually did read the FARs before I posted my question, but I NEVER trust myself when it comes to the FARs! Maybe it's all that repressed part 135 trauma...
Reply
Old 02-28-2009 | 12:30 PM
  #29  
FlyJSH's Avatar
Day puke
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 0
From: Out.
Default

Originally Posted by robthree
Its just the opposite. An SIC is a required crewmember. An autopilot may be used in lieu of the required crewmember.
Quite correct. And use of an autopilot in lieu of an SIC must be approved by the administrator and listed in the OpSpecs.
Reply
Old 02-28-2009 | 11:14 PM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by robthree
Its just the opposite. An SIC is a required crewmember. An autopilot may be used in lieu of the required crewmember.

Ya got me Rob. I guess all those days of getting bumped off of full flights w/ an operating autopilot were a real blow to my ego. On the other hand, those days when I could tell ground ops that they couldn't bump me off the flight due to an MEL'd autopilot were the best

MOCHA
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
freightdog
Regional
64
12-03-2009 02:17 PM
cencal83406
Regional
17
02-03-2009 07:19 PM
Ozpilot414
Regional
1
01-05-2009 12:37 PM
mregan
Regional
10
09-29-2008 12:25 PM
zephyr
Part 135
68
09-21-2008 12:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices