Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
A380 - For Those Who Aspire to Fly One >

A380 - For Those Who Aspire to Fly One

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

A380 - For Those Who Aspire to Fly One

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2009, 01:17 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by TheDashRocks View Post
Three jumpseats?!!!!
Don't think of them as 'jumpseats', think of them as 'cruise pilot' seats. The 380 is designed for long-haul ops only. On most 380 flights (and 74, 340, etc) their is a need for seating for up to 4 pilots per leg.

To me, I only see 1 possible seat open on most flights, and if you want to sit in that for 12+ hours, then have @ it. I'd rather have a seat in coach with the inflight entertainment system.
Sniper is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 01:47 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by MD11 View Post
I probably have a better chance at flying the 380 rather than what I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO FLY... How about a Corsair, a Nieuport 28 or maybe the Fokker Tri-plane,,,, real rotary's of course!
Well, you'll need a time machine for the Fokker Triplane. No example exists in the entire world today.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 02:05 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by TheDashRocks View Post
JOAir plans to use Airbus A380 aircraft configured to seat 1500 passengers in scheduled service
isn't that above the max certified pax for the plane... I thought it was something like 850 or 900...

maybe they are planning to use the A480 tripple decker...
Touk is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 03:57 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Out of Regional Jet flying
Posts: 296
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76 View Post
Well, you'll need a time machine for the Fokker Triplane. No example exists in the entire world today.
Yes you are correct, no more exist. Hitler had two originals,, but they were destroyed due to Allied bombing.
MD11 is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 05:15 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joel payne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: B767A[ret.]
Posts: 593
Default

No sheepskin seats- "Forget about it !!"
joel payne is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 06:48 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,803
Default

Amen, Joel! Sheepskin belongs in the Flightdeck...
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 08:28 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB View Post
Amen, Joel! Sheepskin belongs in the Flightdeck...
bet the sheep disagree..lmao
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 09:51 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by joethepilot View Post
I believe the logic is that really the HUD is only needed for near 0/0 landings... Normal procedure at most airlines call for Captains to fly/land extremely low visibility approaches any way (see CATII at your regional)... hence if it was needed chances are the CA would be flying it any way. The technology is expensive so its not worth putting two in.
Where did you get this? There are rules governing Cat II and Cat III approaches and landings addressed in each airlines ops specs. Normally a Cat II or III approach is flown via the autopilot with an autoland (if applicable). At a lot of airlines the SIC actually is the PF and the PIC monitors the approach until DH at which point he/she assumes the landing and rollout. Cat II and III approaches are very specific in who does what when, callouts, and reasons to execute a GA.
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 04:56 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joachim's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 747
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB View Post
Amen, Joel! Sheepskin belongs in the Flightdeck...
That, and old Mercedes Diesels
Joachim is offline  
Old 03-17-2009, 07:03 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,803
Default

Originally Posted by TPROP4ever View Post
bet the sheep disagree..lmao
Well it's a good thing then that we're on the top of the food-chain!

Originally Posted by Joachim View Post
That, and old Mercedes Diesels
Oh man don't get me started...I need to get myself out of the freakin' RJ bad!
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
Ottopilot
Major
35
03-08-2009 06:37 PM
Mason32
Hangar Talk
8
02-07-2009 07:30 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
51
12-12-2008 11:47 AM
BHopper88
Regional
18
08-06-2008 07:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices