Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Eagle/TSA Jets Failing Inspections >

Eagle/TSA Jets Failing Inspections

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Eagle/TSA Jets Failing Inspections

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2009 | 07:45 PM
  #31  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

The poster you guys are arguing over isn't flying a Falcon 20. He's working on his instrument in a Diamond Katana. Also known as a DA-20.
Old 05-06-2009 | 08:07 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,847
Likes: 10
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip
The poster you guys are arguing over isn't flying a Falcon 20. He's working on his instrument in a Diamond Katana. Also known as a DA-20.
Whoops. Just saw that one post and opened my mouth too wide LoL thanks for clearing that up
Old 05-06-2009 | 08:12 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

Back to the origional post.....Those jets are leaving Eagle MX in better shape than they were going in. In the AF, we had our bad eggs in MX just like in the civilian world. Take it from someone who's done both fix and fly; you can't fix everything.
Old 05-06-2009 | 08:13 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HectorD
If its true, then the people that manage TSA and work for them are a bunch of idiots. If I where flying for them and knew they made me fly a plane that was unairworthy I would send in my resignation right then and there. Did people not learn anything from the Alaska Airlines MD-80 crash?


No you wouldn't.

Last edited by ERJF15; 05-06-2009 at 08:58 PM.
Old 05-06-2009 | 09:02 PM
  #35  
CaptainCarl's Avatar
I'm a man of my word.
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,883
Likes: 0
From: Devil's Advocate
Default

Originally Posted by HectorD
If its true, then the people that manage TSA and work for them are a bunch of idiots. If I where flying for them and knew they made me fly a plane that was unairworthy I would send in my resignation right then and there. Did people not learn anything from the Alaska Airlines MD-80 crash?
COUGH*Nubbin*COUGH
Old 05-06-2009 | 10:21 PM
  #36  
TPROP4ever's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
From: none ya...
Default

Ive got a song stuck in my head, it is kinda like a stuck record. I think the words are "Same ole story, same ole song and dance"
Old 05-06-2009 | 11:35 PM
  #37  
flaps 9's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: 737 F/O
Default

Originally Posted by cgtpilot
I.E. almost brand new.

Not quite!!! Those planes were among the first 50 or so EMB-145's off the line.
Old 05-07-2009 | 07:22 AM
  #38  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: GV
Default

Originally Posted by flaps 9
Not quite!!! Those planes were among the first 50 or so EMB-145's off the line.
If I remember correctly, I think 806 started it's life as a 135, then a 140, then finally a 145. Not sure if that's the correct tail number, but I know one of the planes there was a test bed for Embraer.
Old 05-07-2009 | 07:58 AM
  #39  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Default

I don't think you can go between a 135 and 145 without a major structure change. A 140 is a 135 and size wise is in between the two. Jet 600 was eagles first (now 600BP). Before it was delivered, it had a Brazilian registration.
Old 05-07-2009 | 11:09 AM
  #40  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default

Latest update on the Eagle/TSA planes

from another board
According to some MX guys in ABI that I visited with, they were so concerned about what was being discovered on some of the repo aircraft that they called the FAA to come take a look for themselves.

Once instance he told me was where the fuel low level warning kept going off on one of the aircraft, so TSA MX simply cut the appropriate wire so the warning would no longer go off.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PearlPilot
Technical
26
03-18-2009 07:53 AM
vagabond
Corporate
23
01-03-2009 06:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices