Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Regional (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/)
-   -   Comair Unions Pushing for DL to reconsider (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/regional/40438-comair-unions-pushing-dl-reconsider.html)

Colnago 05-26-2009 08:05 PM


Originally Posted by bored (Post 617498)
The sense of entitlement is disgusting, but not new to us.

Ditto, 'disgusting' is definitely the choice word.

RichieAshburn 05-26-2009 08:06 PM


Originally Posted by cyrcadian (Post 617496)
Huh?

Writing letters and requesting a second look at a new policy is unprofessional?

OK fine, I am unprofessional.

Next time we are in contract negotiations I won't ask for better pay and better work rules and changes that might ultimately improve the industry. It might be unprofessional.

Your pilot group negotiating better pay from YOUR company is not the same as you guys demanding a privilege from MY company.

And yes, it is a privilege. Not a benefit, not a right, not part of the compensation package. My company can change your travel privileges any time they see fit(as they can with mainline also).

IFLY22 05-26-2009 08:09 PM

you delta guys are embarrassing.

cyrcadian 05-26-2009 08:11 PM


Originally Posted by RichieAshburn (Post 617502)
Your pilot group negotiating better pay from YOUR company is not the same as you guys demanding a privilege from MY company.

Oh lest you forget, as much as you loathe the thought, we are the same company.

Just ask any passenger on a Comair flight, they think they are on Delta.

Colnago 05-26-2009 08:13 PM


Originally Posted by IFLY22 (Post 617505)
you delta guys are embarrassing.

I wouldn't let the one child represent the whole family. I doubt they're all like that.

cyrcadian 05-26-2009 08:16 PM


Originally Posted by Colnago (Post 617508)
I wouldn't let the one child represent the whole family. I doubt they're all like that.

No they are not.

Colnago 05-26-2009 08:20 PM


Originally Posted by cyrcadian (Post 617509)
No they are not.

I know, I've met some really humble guys out there willing to help when you most need them.

The truth is one arrogant pilot is one too many.

Boomer 05-26-2009 08:26 PM


Originally Posted by DAL4EVER (Post 617365)
When I travel on an RJ, I have to travel S3C. On numerous occasions I have been bumped in ATL at the last minute because a connection employee traveling on a pass with less seniority shows up.

That is because Delta sold ASA. Prior to that, you would board by DOH on ASA. Now the new-hire ASA guy boards before you. Apparently ASA wasn't the only one to get scrood.

RichieAshburn 05-26-2009 08:28 PM


Originally Posted by Colnago (Post 617514)
I know, I've met some really humble guys out there willing to help when you most need them.

The truth is one arrogant pilot is one too many.

That's funny, I've been a commuter for 14 years. Many times I have given up my reserved jumpseat and took the F/A jumpseat so a regional guy could get to/from work. You label me as a child because I don't support your demand of a change to your privilege? You label me not humble when I've done ANYTHING possible to get commuters on my flight, including standing by the gate agent so we would not leave a regional guy behind.

Just because I voice my opinion and disagreement over your loss of a privilege does not mean I don't try to get EVERY non rev on the aircraft. You have your opinion on this subject, I have mine. Mine seems to be in line with DAL management and most DAL pilots.

cyrcadian 05-26-2009 08:39 PM


Originally Posted by RichieAshburn (Post 617518)
Mine seems to be in line with DAL management and most DAL pilots.

Just to toss out some ideas. . .

Complications related to implementation aside, would you (speaking on behalf of "most DAL pilots") support a change to the pass benefits that would enable a commuting pilot or flight attendant of a regional subsidiary to use S3 status?

gmcd05 05-26-2009 08:42 PM

How does being a wholly owned subsidiary mean you should get reduced benefits?? In the end, being the employee of a subsidiary of delta should be the same as being an employee of delta. Of course the mainline guys are ok with this, all excuses aside, it doesn't matter if it's right or not, just that it's in their benefit. Maybe if you stepped up for once and demanded the same benefits and salaries for those at the wholly owned companies, there would be less of an incentive to outsource flying in general... The arrogance of some mainline guys on this board is astounding...

You may have a legitimate argument with contract carriers, but they should still have priority on their own metal...

RichieAshburn 05-26-2009 08:52 PM


Originally Posted by cyrcadian (Post 617519)
Just to toss out some ideas. . .

Complications related to implementation aside, would you (speaking on behalf of "most DAL pilots") support a change to the pass benefits that would enable a commuting pilot or flight attendant of a regional subsidiary to use S3 status?

I don't speak for DAL pilots, never said I did. However, I do speak TO DAL pilots on a daily basis and know how we (as a group) feel on numerous subjects. Read DAL pilots responses on this thread, all of us have similar opinions.

Now, to answer your question, on a mainline flight...no. On another DCI carrier...I would not have a problem.

Colnago 05-26-2009 09:13 PM


Originally Posted by RichieAshburn (Post 617518)
You label me as a child because I don't support your demand of a change to your privilege?

I did not label you as a child. It was used figuratively. I can't say I'm sorry you take everything literally. You're not really a child nor is Delta your real family. It was a comparison. You wouldn't want one of your children to give others a bad image of your whole family. Make sense?


Mine seems to be in line with DAL management and most DAL pilots.
I'm fairly certain you have not asked this particular question nor have you heard it directly from the other 12000 pilots at the company so it's kind of an exaggeration to say you know what the majority of the DAL pilots desire. You can only assume. Regardless, it doesn't matter what you really feel. DAL mgmt called the shots and they don't really care what one pilot really thinks. It is what it is.

H46Bubba 05-26-2009 09:14 PM


Originally Posted by RichieAshburn (Post 617530)
I don't speak for DAL pilots, never said I did. However, I do speak TO DAL pilots on a daily basis and know how we (as a group) feel on numerous subjects. Read DAL pilots responses on this thread, all of us have similar opinions.

Now, to answer your question, on a mainline flight...no. On another DCI carrier...I would not have a problem.

Would you and other Delta pilots support say Wholly Owned active employees traveling as S3B on mainline flights? I think that is still a fair option.

Boomer 05-26-2009 09:29 PM


Originally Posted by NWA320pilot (Post 617390)
This is not a flame but the reality of all this is you are not a DAL employee....my paycheck came from the company that I actually worked for.

According to page 11 of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (of which Delta and Northwest are subsidiaries) 2008 SEC Filing:

"As of December 31, 2008, we (Delta Air Lines, Inc.) had a total of 84,306 full-time equivalent employees. Approximately 42% of these employees were represented by unions, including the following domestic employee groups.

Delta Pilots (including pre-merger NWA pilots) 11,040
Delta Flight Superintendants (Dispatchers) 180
NWA Dispatchers 150
NWA Fleet Service, Passenger Service, Office/Clerical 11,030
NWA Simulator Technicians 40
NWA Stock Clerks 270
NWA Flight Attendants 6,290
NWA Mechanics and Related Employees 900
NWA Plant Protection Employees 10
NWA Tech Operations Trainers, Planners, Analysts 170
NWA Meteorologists 20
Comair Pilots 1,190
Comair Maintenance Employees 500
Comair Flight Attendants 790
Compass Pilots 320
Mesaba Pilots 1,090
Mesaba Flight Attendants 650
Mesaba Mechanics and Related Employees 310
Mesaba Dispatchers 25 "


So is Delta falsifying SEC reports by saying Comair Pilots are employees when in fact they are not?

DAL4EVER 05-27-2009 01:58 AM


Originally Posted by gmcd05 (Post 617522)
How does being a wholly owned subsidiary mean you should get reduced benefits?? In the end, being the employee of a subsidiary of delta should be the same as being an employee of delta. Of course the mainline guys are ok with this, all excuses aside, it doesn't matter if it's right or not, just that it's in their benefit. Maybe if you stepped up for once and demanded the same benefits and salaries for those at the wholly owned companies, there would be less of an incentive to outsource flying in general... The arrogance of some mainline guys on this board is astounding...

You may have a legitimate argument with contract carriers, but they should still have priority on their own metal...

The arrogance you refer to, is it the same arrogance that had the CMR MEC's stated position that any furloughee must resign his original seniority number to come work for CMR during the 2001-2007 timeframe? Talk about brother helping a fellow brother in need. And why is it up to us to argue for your wages and benefits? I do think you should be brought up, supported CMR guys on strike in 2001, but in the end only the respective employee group can fight their fight. CMR guys certainly didn't rally behind the DAL guys the past eight years.

Pineapple Guy 05-27-2009 02:13 AM


Originally Posted by RichieAshburn (Post 617502)
Your pilot group negotiating better pay from YOUR company is not the same as you guys demanding a privilege from MY company.

And yes, it is a privilege. Not a benefit, not a right, not part of the compensation package. My company can change your travel privileges any time they see fit(as they can with mainline also).

It may be a privilege for you, but for a DAL pilot, travel benefits are a contractual right. From the Delta PWA Section 24:

L. Free and Reduced Rate Transportation
1. Free and reduced rate transportation privileges granted by Company policy to noncontract personnel now or in the future, will be extended to pilots.
2. There will be no substantial reduction in on-line transportation privileges as a whole, for pilots during the term of this PWA.

I guess Comair pilots should have had a similar clause in THEIR contract. :(

PG

cyrcadian 05-27-2009 05:37 AM


Originally Posted by RichieAshburn (Post 617530)
Now, to answer your question, on a mainline flight...no. On another DCI carrier...I would not have a problem.

Really?

This is you honest opinion?

Why? I mean really tell me why.

You claim you are such a hero for taking the FA jumpseat to help out a commuting regional guy, yet you decide this is a helping hand you are not willing to give. I don't get it. How do S3's, for commuting only, hurt you?

INAV8OR 05-27-2009 05:52 AM

This thread proves to me a few things that I always thought:
1. Most pilots would eat their young if it meant a better life for themselves.
2. If someone isn't pisin and moaning about something, they are not a pilot.
3. Our ALPA, is not a union, it is an association. Meaning that if you are a member of ALPA, you are just associated with it. A union is unified not divided. If our groups worked together and everyone was not out for themselves, this job would have a good future in america. I wonder if their is a Medical Doctors Central forum where they all bit88 about each others bosses?

INAV8OR 05-27-2009 06:03 AM


Originally Posted by DAL4EVER (Post 617577)
The arrogance you refer to, is it the same arrogance that had the CMR MEC's stated position that any furloughee must resign his original seniority number to come work for CMR during the 2001-2007 timeframe? Talk about brother helping a fellow brother in need. And why is it up to us to argue for your wages and benefits? I do think you should be brought up, supported CMR guys on strike in 2001, but in the end only the respective employee group can fight their fight. CMR guys certainly didn't rally behind the DAL guys the past eight years.

I was at CMR at that time, and now a NERD (NeverEverRealDelta). And not to steal the thread, it was CMR mgmt that was in charge of the hiring, not our MEC. Also, some believed that the Real Delta pilots wanted to come in as Captains and displace the bottom of our list. Also, somewhere, not sure, in the ALPA bylaws, you can't have 2 ALPA cards at 2 different ALPA carriers. One more thing, I remember being on strike in 01, the Delta guys were kind enough to walk with us. However, the signs they carried talked about their upcoming contract that helped send them in to BR along with us. Then when they got the contract they, delta pilots, were encougaging us to settle for a worse contract then we got. So, it is not about treating the regional carriers like a triple A club. I for one am glad we didn't hire the delta guys at that time, because all it would have done is caused a bunch of training for our company to write in the books. Rant over for me...BTW when I get a chance to fly with a real delta guy, nothing will be mentioned of Comair.

BlueMoon 05-27-2009 06:32 AM


Originally Posted by INAV8OR (Post 617644)
I was at CMR at that time, and now a NERD (NeverEverRealDelta). And not to steal the thread, it was CMR mgmt that was in charge of the hiring, not our MEC.

I wasn't there at the time, I believe the MEC had a statement to the effect that they supported the companies policy of seniority resignation. Now the rumor is that the MEC didn't want to spend bargaining capital on changing a policy unless they recieved soemthing from the DAL MEC (like more planes)

I for one am glad we didn't hire the delta guys at that time, because all it would have done is caused a bunch of training for our company to write in the books. Rant over for me...BTW when I get a chance to fly with a real delta guy, nothing will be mentioned of Comair.

I think the MEC should of passed a resolution like the ones they pass for soemthing as small as "pass benefits" that said the encouraged the hiring of DAL furloughs without seniority resignation. At least that would have been something. Then again I wasn't around when this happened and don;t know what went down and given the people in power at the time(same people in power for the first 2yrs I was here) I wouldn't be surpised if more than 3/4 of the pilot group didn't either

Given the present state of our company, I can't see how hiring DAL furloughs would have hurt us, who knows maybe it owuld have helped us as the DAL pilots would be more willing to listen to our plight.

Dal guys I have had on the jumpseat of flights that I have worked have been great and a good change of pace to the some of the *****ing that goes down. Nothing like listening to the guy next to you complain about the new pass privelages for 3 straight days and how Delta is screwing him and how he is technically a Delta pilot.

Selcall 05-27-2009 07:04 AM

If its a Delta flight number then if it your metal, then I think it should go DOH between the two of us. If I am more senior to you then I shold have priority. Remember the flying your company is doing is contracted for MY Company....plain and simple. Rage on.....:)

acl65pilot 05-27-2009 07:08 AM

I do not have an issue if you get DOH but every for DCI pilot should get their then, and all of the military guys should get credit for their YOS. (In effect a pipe dream)
All they are doing is making it harder and harder to stay at a regional. They are trying to push you up or out. It is one more way to get the DCI costs down.

andy171773 05-27-2009 10:46 AM


Originally Posted by DAL4EVER (Post 617577)
The arrogance you refer to, is it the same arrogance that had the CMR MEC's stated position that any furloughee must resign his original seniority number to come work for CMR during the 2001-2007 timeframe? Talk about brother helping a fellow brother in need. And why is it up to us to argue for your wages and benefits? I do think you should be brought up, supported CMR guys on strike in 2001, but in the end only the respective employee group can fight their fight. CMR guys certainly didn't rally behind the DAL guys the past eight years.

The rest of Europe couldn't lend aid to England in the early 40's when the Battle of Britain was raging, because they were getting the crap kicked out of them too.

Comair has taken MORE than its fair share of beatings at the hands of Delta's bankruptcy, and it's gotten WORSE since.

Can you say the same about mainline Delta? Last I saw, Comair's upgrade times are meeting and in some cases EXCEEDING Delta's...How could Comair possibly help out Delta, when they're sinking themselves?


Reference

Delta
Most junior captain hired: Jul 2000 (MD88/New York)

Comair
Most Junior CVG 70/90 capt: Nov 1999
Most Junior CVG 50 capt: July 1999
Most Junior JFK 50 capt: Dec 2000

And in all honesty, it wouldn't surprise me if Comair's upgrade times are even LONGER now.

This angst against Comair for something the "MEC may or may not have done" in 2003 is ridiculous. It was a crap situation for everyone, and the MEC Chair was a piece of garbage, but he's gone now. Why do the hard feeling still remain?

United we stand, divided we fall, last i checked neither RJs nor 777s have parachutes......

This industry is in a flat spin, and this petty bickering over "travel privileges" is absurd. How would ya'll feel if NWA bought you, and let their retirees and parents board before you? Would you say, well..it's their metal..guess i'll call commuter and not get paid for a day or two of my trip, my mortgage payment can wait, and my kids don't need to eat.

I'm not disagreeing with mainline having priority on mainline airplanes, DOH between regionals and mainline guys on DL metal is silly. All we're saying is S3 on our own planes (equal with mainline guys..fine), and at least S3b on mainline, there's no reason Ma and Pa Delta should bump Joe Schmoe FO and Jane Doe FA from CVG - JFK because momma and daddy D are going to Hawaii to celebrate a geriatric luau. Must we remind ya'll that your parents never worked for Delta...so why should THEY have priority over a COMMUTING PILOT.

Teams aside, we all should be fighting the same battle..and it shouldn't be this.

BlueMoon 05-27-2009 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by andy171773 (Post 617757)
Why do the hard feeling still remain?

Because people won't let it die. How many times in ops have you heard some one ranting about Delta. Their are people out there that are ****ed at Delta pilots for some reason about the pass privelages, even though they have nothing to do with it what so ever. Some people have entitlement issues.

It will continue until people grow up and start acting like adults and quit pointing the finger at the other side an blaming all of their problems on them.

It is the 2-3% (either side) that keep the hard feelings fresh.

Avroman 05-27-2009 12:23 PM


Originally Posted by RichieAshburn (Post 617447)
Less priority than the actual employee, I have no problems. However dependents, parents...NO WAY. Reason being, MY COMPANY owns and sells the seats. My company pays for the fuel. My company controls what aircraft are on that route. My company owns that flying. DAL pilots should get priority over anyone but that particular regionals employee.

Well sort of... Your company (including your union) gave that flying away by choice..... yes the brand is there but nothing else. It's like Coke whining about poor product being made by a franchise bottler. They chose to sell off part of their process so it's not really entirely theirs anymore. Same with airlines.

80ktsClamp 05-27-2009 12:57 PM


Originally Posted by INAV8OR (Post 617644)
Also, somewhere, not sure, in the ALPA bylaws, you can't have 2 ALPA cards at 2 different ALPA carriers. One more thing, I remember being on strike in 01, the Delta guys were kind enough to walk with us.


A little history correction is due here. If this is the case, then why did a number of Delta Furloughees end up at ASA (and the same for NWA furloughees end up at Pinnacle... plus many other regionals) without having to resign their seniority?


The entitlement attitudes of Comair and other DCI carriers forever astounds me. You want mainline privaleges? Get a job at mainline. You are outsourced labor at carriers built as stepping stones, despite what you may assert. Selcall echoes my sentiments exactly in regards to my feelings on what the bennies should be.

byebyeairlines 05-27-2009 02:06 PM


Originally Posted by Selcall (Post 617662)
If its a Delta flight number then if it your metal, then I think it should go DOH between the two of us. If I am more senior to you then I shold have priority. Remember the flying your company is doing is contracted for MY Company....plain and simple. Rage on.....:)

It is going to make me happy when that no furlough clause goes away and your selling me paint at Home Depot. How dare you rip on people that were laid off in this industry.

NWA320pilot 05-27-2009 02:29 PM


Originally Posted by byebyeairlines (Post 617889)
It is going to make me happy when that no furlough clause goes away and your selling me paint at Home Depot. How dare you rip on people that were laid off in this industry.

And you would call this what?

BlaineFaban 05-27-2009 02:31 PM


Originally Posted by byebyeairlines (Post 617889)
It is going to make me happy when that no furlough clause goes away and your selling me paint at Home Depot. How dare you rip on people that were laid off in this industry.

Ha Ha. Defending the helpless Comair guys. It's time to just close Comair down for good. The dud was right, every regional job is a direct result of Christmas from mainline. The non-rev seats should be no different. Most Delta guys think that Comair people should also come behind Delta on Comair metal as well.

RJcursed4life 05-27-2009 04:55 PM

[quote=INAV8OR;617639]This thread proves to me a few things that I always thought:
1. Most pilots would eat their young if it meant a better life for themselves.
2. If someone isn't pisin and moaning about something, they are not a pilot.
3. Our ALPA, is not a union, it is an association. Meaning that if you are a member of ALPA, you are just associated with it. A union is unified not divided. If our groups worked together and everyone was not out for themselves, this job would have a good future in america.

Boy, do you have that right. Life would be better for everyone if all flying was under mainline. It's time for some scope to get reeled in and the union to act like one.

Stringer 05-27-2009 05:45 PM


Originally Posted by BlaineFaban (Post 617901)
Ha Ha. Defending the helpless Comair guys. It's time to just close Comair down for good. The dud was right, every regional job is a direct result of Christmas from mainline. The non-rev seats should be no different. Most Delta guys think that Comair people should also come behind Delta on Comair metal as well.

I'm furloughed Comair. It sure gives me a warm and fuzzy feeling about this industry when I read posts such as this from my ALPA 'brothers'.

I'm not asking for pitty but some tact would be nice.

Av8rking 05-27-2009 07:19 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 617848)
The entitlement attitudes of Comair and other DCI carriers forever astounds me. You want mainline privaleges? Get a job at mainline. You are outsourced labor at carriers built as stepping stones, despite what you may assert. Selcall echoes my sentiments exactly in regards to my feelings on what the bennies should be.

I wasn't at Comair at the time, but why did Delta pay almost $2 BILLION for Comair? I think it was because Delta was afraid of what the company was capable of. I just don't understand why Delta, (our ALPA brothers) dont care where we are coming from with this benefit change. We DON'T want priority on your flights. We just want to be ahead of retirees and family members when we are trying to get to our job as commuters. (Bye the way, out of all the employee groups effected by this new change, we are the only group to take concessions!)

80ktsClamp 05-27-2009 07:26 PM


Originally Posted by Av8rking (Post 618081)
I wasn't at Comair at the time, but why did Delta pay almost $2 BILLION for Comair? I think it was because Delta was afraid of what the company was capable of. I just don't understand why Delta, (our ALPA brothers) dont care where we are coming from with this benefit change. We DON'T want priority on your flights. We just want to be ahead of retirees and family members when we are trying to get to our job as commuters. (Bye the way, out of all the employee groups effected by this new change, we are the only group to take concessions!)


Tell that little rant to all of our guys that got stranded there when DFW closed, to all the Republic (the old Republic) guys when ATL was closed...and many others.

This career is a strange and twisting road. Live with it, make the best of it, or get out.

Av8rking 05-27-2009 07:37 PM


Originally Posted by Selcall (Post 618082)
1. I am not your union brother nor will I ever be. If you are not flying an airplane with a prop on it that seats 34 people or less then your very job is a detriment to my professional survival in this industry. The 50 seat, 76 seat, 86 seat, 70 seat, etc...regional jet is an infestation within this industry that I cannot stand. While I spent many a dark night flying those things in a previous life I decided to jump into the abyss and now sit on the other side of the fence. While you may protest that we have similar issues with management and so forth I find the wrench of entitlement (that I see from many on this board) vile and without merrit. It's like being a AAA baseball player guys. Sure you might have a lot of prospects looking at you and sure the men from the big show might buy you a beer every now and then but until you get sent up you will never be my "Brother" in this industry. Your very existence, while many argue is essential to the Airline industry, is a complete contradiction to my own betterment in this profession.

WOW!!! Another reason I enjoy paying my union dues!:eek:

pilotsarestupid 05-27-2009 07:40 PM

First of all, I get booted from these boards for less offensive comments than this selcall jerk and his is still up... ridiculous.

To you selcall...
your comments are exactly whats wrong with this industry. first, you had to start somewhere. second, don't think you are all high and mighty just because you fly for a major. i respect the work you put in to get there, but dont bash us that are just trying to squeak out a living to get there. last time im fairly certain they arent going to fly an md88 from memphis to ft. smith arkansas that is why we have regional carriers, obviously you missed that somewhere along your "journey." I have flown on many carriers in their jumpseat coming back from vacation or going to work who were a lot more respectful of us than you have been on this board. I dont agree with what our union has done but im furloughed and dont really have a say in that. Dont lump us in with everything else that has happened. you have obviously shown your ignorance or should i say arrogance with your comments on here. it would be better for us if you went and jump off a building you "old codger"

theaviator 05-27-2009 10:04 PM

*Deleted* I had nothing nice to say.

wheresmyplane 05-28-2009 01:18 AM

You know, it took this thread a little less than 3 pages to digress to name calling and accusations. With all this "unity" we have as pilots, I can't really fault those that only look out for themselves in this industry. I mean really, can't we all just get along???????? Lets hold hands and sing Kumbaya.

Selcall 05-28-2009 03:04 AM

I am going to try to address a couple of things about this forum. Please understand that it's nothing personal but needs to be said. I cannot speak for all of us at mainline nor would I ever want to but here is a prevailing sentiment you will find with a lot of us "Mainline Pilots".

1. I am not your union brother nor will I ever be. If you are not flying an airplane with a prop on it that seats 34 people or less then your very job is a detriment to my professional survival in this industry. The 50 seat, 76 seat, 86 seat, 70 seat, etc...regional jet is an infestation within this industry that I cannot stand. While I spent many a dark night flying those things in a previous life I decided to jump into the abyss and now sit on the other side of the fence. While you may protest that we have similar issues with management and so forth I find the wrench of entitlement (that I see from many on this board) vile and without merrit. It's like being a AAA baseball player guys. Sure you might have a lot of prospects looking at you and sure the men from the big show might buy you a beer every now and then but until you get sent up you will never be my "Brother" in this industry. Your very existence, while many argue is essential to the Airline industry, is a complete contradiction to my own betterment in this profession.

I personally and many I talk to could care less about how it sucks your family cannot get back from SFO to ATL via SLC because of all our "Mainline" employees happen to be out there also and keep bumping you from flights. Guess what, the same thing happens to all of us "mainline" guys with our families and even on our commutes to work. We deal with it, make alternate plans or even buy a ticket if we know we have to be there. We plan ahead as much as possible, show our due dilligence in trying to get to work, and then move on. Try doing it yourself.

2. I and many of my fellow pilots have been more than happy in the past to give up the jumpseat, take an FA seat if available to assist many a regional pilot to work. Even though he screwed up, never left himself a backup because the girlfriend was in town last night, yada yada yada I am always obligatory and help out wherever I can. I will continue to do so because it's the right thing to do.

Stringer: Tact and patience is something many of us do not have on this board any more for the constant complaining about how "Big Brother Management" is making life so hard on your fellow pilots at the regionals.

I am not trying to be triffling but please if this job is that bad then please go to Home Depot and find gainful employment, leave the nasty business of flying to us old codgers, and learn how to help me when I come to Home Depot and ask about a good groundcover perrenial for a full sun area.

I and many I talk to are tired of the constant whining about the loss of privileges and the audacious sense of entitlement we hear from the newest or youngest generation of pilots hand picked to spend $64,000.00 to learn how to fly a regional jet in a simulator.

I do not want the closet you call a crew room either as some on this board have suggested.

TristarJS30 05-28-2009 04:34 AM


Originally Posted by Selcall (Post 618196)
1. I am not your union brother nor will I ever be. If you are not flying an airplane with a prop on it that seats 34 people or less then your very job is a detriment to my professional survival in this industry. The 50 seat, 76 seat, 86 seat, 70 seat, etc...regional jet is an infestation within this industry that I cannot stand. While I spent many a dark night flying those things in a previous life I decided to jump into the abyss and now sit on the other side of the fence.

For someone who benefited from flying the 'infestation' of 50-76 seat jets to get enough hours to get a job at mainline, you have an awful amount of negative things to say about your own roots.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands